Concerns Rise as DOT Turns to AI for Drafting Safety Regulations

DOT to Use Artificial Intelligence to Draft Safety Regulations, and That Worries People

Soon, the safety regulations that keep airplanes in the sky, car passengers safe, and prevent gas pipelines from exploding might be written by Google Gemini. This worries some people in the Transportation Department, especially given the focus on quantity rather than quality, with the Department aiming for “good enough.”

The Role of Artificial Intelligence

So-called artificial intelligence has touched every aspect of our lives. Everything is AI-something these days, even though there is nothing truly intelligent about it. The term “artificial intelligence” almost always refers to large language models (LLMs), which are anything but intelligent. Instead, they excel at predicting what word (or pixel) can best be used next to another by analyzing countless similar contexts and what humans would have chosen.

Concerns Over AI Hallucinations

AI hallucinations are common, even though the phrases written by a chatbot seem to make perfect sense at first. That poor LLM has absolutely no idea about the meaning of the words it’s generating, let alone being intelligent. Despite this, LLMs are increasingly used by people who are too lazy to conduct their own research. The downside is that these individuals often have no way of knowing whether the chatbot is correct.

Worries Within the Transportation Department

This should explain why some people inside the Transportation Department are worried that the DOT now wants to use AI chatbots to draft safety regulations in their line of duty. Staffers are concerned that any failure to catch AI errors could result in flawed regulations that, at best, could lead to litigation and lawsuits. At worst, they could lead to injuries and deaths in the transportation system.

Demonstrations of AI Capabilities

During a demonstration of Gemini’s rule-drafting abilities, the LLM produced a document that lacked key text, which a staffer had to fill in. However, DOT’s top lawyer, Gregory Zerzan, doesn’t seem bothered at all. In a December meeting, Zerzan explained that he wanted Gemini because it could draft rules in under 30 minutes, rather than weeks or even months for human advisors.

We don’t need the perfect rule on XYZ,” Zerzan told DOT staffers at the meeting. “We don’t even need a very good rule on XYZ. We want good enough.”

The Serious Implications

However, these rules touch every facet of transportation safety, and “good enough” just won’t cut it. In this case, any error could have serious consequences. It seems “wildly irresponsible”, as one staffer confessed to ProPublica. Among the rules drafted with Gemini’s help is a still-unpublished Federal Aviation Administration rule, according to a DOT staffer briefed on the matter.

Government Push for AI Adoption

Apparently, Donald Trump has requested that federal agencies adopt AI at a fast pace. However, drafting laws and regulations has not been specifically mentioned. Nevertheless, Zerzan wants DOT to be “the point of the spear” in this effort and “the first agency that is fully enabled to use AI to draft rules.”

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...