China’s Scrutiny of Meta’s Acquisition of AI Startup Manus

China Investigates Meta’s Acquisition of Manus

The recent acquisition of the AI startup Manus by Meta has become entangled in geopolitical complexities, with China’s Ministry of Commerce announcing a review of the deal. This review is focused on compliance with regulations regarding technology exports, data movement, and foreign investment.

Overview of the Meta-Manus Deal

The transaction was expected to be straightforward: Meta planned to acquire Manus, maintain its services, and integrate the AI agents into its applications. However, China’s involvement complicates matters, as the Ministry asserts that Manus’ Singapore base does not exempt it from Chinese scrutiny.

Valuation and Importance of Manus

While Meta has not publicly disclosed the specific terms of the deal, it has been widely reported to be valued between $2 billion and $3 billion. This significant investment is for a company that promises to deliver AI agents capable of performing tasks beyond mere conversation. Manus’ technology is designed to handle complex goals such as:

  • Summarizing documents
  • Screening resumes
  • Planning trips
  • Analyzing stocks

These agents are engineered to create virtual workspaces, execute tasks, and deliver completed outputs, aligning with Meta’s ambition to dominate the AI assistant market within messaging and business tools.

Manus’ Performance

Since its launch, Manus has shown promising growth, reporting over $100 million in annual recurring revenue shortly after its inception and claiming a $125 million revenue run rate, including usage-based earnings. However, Meta’s integration of Manus into its ecosystem often leads to changes in service delivery and policy.

Geopolitical Implications

Despite being based in Singapore, Manus was founded in China and maintains ties to the country, including a partnership with Alibaba. This places it under increased scrutiny by the Chinese government, which views advanced AI capabilities as strategic assets. The Ministry’s review raises critical questions about:

  • What constitutes an export?
  • What is considered a sensitive transfer?
  • Who possesses the authority to approve these transactions?

Beijing’s examination of the deal reflects its stringent approach to technology policy, particularly concerning AI, which is treated as an element of industrial strategy.

Meta’s Position

In response to these concerns, Meta asserts that there will be no ongoing Chinese ownership interest in Manus post-acquisition. Furthermore, Manus plans to cease operations in China altogether. However, the question remains whether these actions will satisfy regulatory requirements from both the U.S. and China.

Meta’s AI Strategy

Meta has been actively investing in AI technologies, raising its capital expenditure outlook for 2025 to between $64 billion and $72 billion, emphasizing its commitment to AI infrastructure and competitiveness. The acquisition of Manus aligns with Meta’s strategy to centralize its AI efforts and reduce internal bottlenecks, enhancing its ability to deploy AI solutions across various applications.

The Future of AI Agents

AI agents represent a convergence of software, data, and labor. As such, they are increasingly viewed by regulators as technologies requiring oversight rather than mere software features. While Meta seeks to implement these agents swiftly, the Chinese government is poised to determine whether such deployments infringe upon regulatory boundaries, regardless of where the company is headquartered.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...