A group of MEPs has expressed serious concerns to the European Commission about proposed changes to the AI code of practice, which would make risk assessments for fundamental rights and democracy voluntary for AI system providers. They argue that this shift undermines the core principles of the AI Act, potentially allowing discriminatory content and political interference in elections.
Recent developments in Virginia and Texas indicate a shift towards more pro-innovation AI policies, as both states have rejected heavy-handed regulatory measures that could hinder technological advancement. Virginia’s Governor Youngkin vetoed a significant AI regulatory bill, while Texas is revising its approach to avoid similar pitfalls.
As the integration of quantum computing and AI accelerates, establishing global regulation is crucial to prevent misuse and ensure these technologies benefit humanity. The potential for both positive and negative outcomes underscores the urgency of creating a responsible framework for quantum AI.
The European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) is a significant legislation aimed at regulating AI systems within the EU to ensure safety, transparency, and accountability. With the Act becoming law on August 2, 2024, companies must prepare for a series of compliance deadlines over the next few years.
Governments around the world are struggling to balance the need for regulation with the rapid expansion of AI technology. While the European Union aims to establish a legal framework for AI, the U.S. adopts a more laissez-faire approach to foster innovation.
On March 4, 2025, the Irish government approved a recommendation to implement a distributed regulatory model for enforcing the EU Artificial Intelligence Act. This marks a significant step in establishing a framework for AI governance in Ireland, designating eight public bodies as national competent authorities responsible for oversight in their respective sectors.
This blog post explores the potential overlaps and contradictions between the EU’s AI Act and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). It highlights the importance of understanding how both regulations interact, particularly regarding the processing of personal data by AI systems.
This blog post explores the rise of experimental regulations and regulatory sandboxes within the context of the EU’s AI Act, emphasizing their potential to foster innovation while safeguarding fundamental rights. It analyzes whether these new legislative approaches can effectively address the challenges posed by rapidly evolving artificial intelligence technologies.
Meta Platforms Inc., Adobe Inc., and over 70 other publicly-traded US companies are expressing concerns regarding the potential risks posed by the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act in their annual reports. The regulation may lead to significant compliance costs and compel changes to their product offerings due to strict enforcement measures.
Japan’s recent interim report on AI regulation signals a shift towards a more cautious approach, favoring existing sector-specific laws over new comprehensive regulations. This reflects a broader trend among developed economies to ease regulatory frameworks amidst concerns about stifling innovation.
Take the first steps in your transformation towards international AI compliance.
Our expert sales team is here to answer your questions, just leave your email and we’ll get in touch.
