EU Seeks Stakeholder Input on Upcoming AI Guidelines

Commission: Call for Input on EU Rules for General-Purpose AI Models

The European Commission is currently seeking feedback from stakeholders as it prepares to draft new guidelines governing general-purpose AI (GPAI) models. This initiative is part of the ongoing development of the AI Act, which aims to establish a regulatory framework for AI technologies within the European Union.

Consultation Process

In a recent announcement, the European Commission opened a consultation process inviting stakeholders to contribute their insights and experiences. This targeted consultation is essential for shaping the upcoming guidelines, which are intended to clarify key concepts related to GPAI models.

The Commission emphasized the importance of stakeholder input, stating that the guidelines will offer detailed explanations on critical questions such as:

  • What constitutes a general-purpose AI model?
  • Who qualifies as a provider in various scenarios?
  • What actions are considered as placing a GPAI model on the market?

Support for Compliance

The guidelines are also set to outline how the AI Office will assist stakeholders in achieving compliance with the new rules. Additionally, they will detail how signing the Code of Practice—pending approval by the AI Office and the AI Board—could potentially alleviate administrative burdens for providers and serve as a benchmark for regulatory compliance.

Feedback Deadline and Stakeholder Engagement

Stakeholders, including providers of GPAI models, downstream AI system providers, civil society representatives, academics, and public authorities, are encouraged to submit their feedback by May 22, 2025. The Commission aims to publish the new guidelines before August 2025, although it is important to note that these guidelines will not be legally binding. Instead, they will serve as a resource for understanding the enforcement of GPAI rules within the wider framework of the AI Act.

Complementary Guidelines and Future Consultations

The forthcoming guidelines will complement the Code of Practice on General-Purpose AI, which is also scheduled for publication this summer. This will precede the formal implementation of the AI Act’s rules on GPAI, highlighting the Commission’s commitment to establishing a comprehensive regulatory environment for AI technologies.

Furthermore, the Commission is preparing to conduct a targeted consultation regarding the classification of AI systems as high-risk, which will further refine the regulatory landscape.

The EU AI Act: A Landmark Regulation

The EU AI Act, which entered into force last August, represents a significant step toward regulating the powerful capabilities of AI technologies. However, it is noteworthy that approximately 85% of all AI systems remain unregulated under this act, as stated by Henna Virkkunen, the executive vice-president for tech sovereignty, security, and democracy.

Virkkunen emphasized the Commission’s intention to ensure that companies understand that they are not subject to the AI Act’s regulations. For the remaining 15% of AI systems that fall under the act, the goal is to simplify compliance processes.

AI Act Service Desk

To facilitate this, the Commission plans to establish the AI Act Service Desk, which will serve as a central resource for businesses seeking guidance on compliance with the AI Act. This hub will provide vital information and support for navigating the new regulatory environment.

In summary, the European Commission’s initiative to gather stakeholder input on GPAI models is a crucial step toward developing a transparent and effective regulatory framework that balances innovation with accountability. Stakeholders are encouraged to actively participate in this consultation process to ensure that their insights shape the future of AI regulation in the EU.

More Insights

Congress’s Silent Strike Against AI Regulation

A provision in Congress's budget bill could preempt all state regulation of AI for the next ten years, effectively removing public recourse against AI-related harm. This measure threatens the progress...

Congress Moves to Limit California’s AI Protections

House Republicans are advancing legislation that would impose a 10-year ban on state regulations regarding artificial intelligence, alarming California leaders who fear it would undermine existing...

AI Missteps and National Identity: Lessons from Malaysia’s Flag Controversies

Recent incidents involving AI-generated misrepresentations of Malaysia’s national flag highlight the urgent need for better digital governance and AI literacy. The failures in recognizing national...

Responsible AI: Insights from the Global Trust Maturity Survey

The rapid growth of generative AI and large language models is driving adoption across various business functions, necessitating the deployment of AI in a safe and responsible manner. A recent...

Driving Responsible AI: The Business Case for Ethical Innovation

Philosophical principles and regulatory frameworks have often dominated discussions on AI ethics, failing to resonate with key decision-makers. This article identifies three primary drivers—top-down...

Streamlining AI Regulations for Competitive Advantage in Europe

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) complicates the necessary use of data and AI, hindering companies from leveraging AI's potential effectively. To enhance European competitiveness, there...

Colorado’s AI Act: Legislative Setback and Compliance Challenges Ahead

The Colorado Legislature recently failed to amend the Artificial Intelligence Act, originally passed in 2024, which imposes strict regulations on high-risk AI systems. Proposed amendments aimed to...

AI in Recruitment: Balancing Innovation and Compliance

AI is revolutionizing recruitment by streamlining processes such as resume screening and candidate engagement, but it also raises concerns about bias and compliance with regulations. While the EU has...

EU Member States Struggle to Fund AI Act Enforcement

EU policy adviser Kai Zenner has warned that many EU member states are facing financial difficulties and a shortage of expertise necessary to enforce the AI Act effectively. As the phased...