Tech Giants Critique Europe’s AI Regulations

At the Techarena conference in Stockholm on February 20, 2025, executives from leading US tech companies, Meta and Google, openly criticized Europe’s AI Act and GDPR, arguing that these regulations are hindering innovation and competitiveness in the region.

Delays and Compliance Issues

Chris Yiu, Meta’s public policy chief, highlighted the negative impact of European regulations on product launches. He stated, “There is now broad consensus that European regulation around technology has its issues. And the result is products get delayed or watered down. European consumers lose.” This sentiment was echoed with an example of Meta’s AI-powered Ray-Ban glasses, which experienced significant delays in their European launch due to regulatory challenges.

Yiu explained how the glasses, designed to translate speech in real-time and assist the visually impaired, faced months of legal complications to comply with the EU’s regulatory framework before being launched in select countries in November 2023.

Challenges with GDPR

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) also posed hurdles. Meta reported difficulties in legally utilizing user data from Instagram and Facebook to train AI models without violating privacy laws. This illustrates the complex landscape tech companies must navigate to operate in Europe.

Outdated Regulations

Dorothy Chou, head of public policy at Google DeepMind, criticized the AI Act for being outdated, noting that it was drafted in April 2021, well before the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022. “You can’t regulate AI with outdated rules. The tech moves too fast,” she asserted, suggesting that the current framework fails to keep pace with technological advancements.

Chou contrasted this with the US Inflation Reduction Act, which promotes investment and innovation rather than imposing stringent restrictions. She emphasized that policy can be structured to foster a conducive environment for AI development while ensuring responsible practices.

Industry Reactions

Kent Walker, Google’s president of global affairs, criticized the EU’s new AI Code of Practice, describing it as “a step in the wrong direction.” Joel Kaplan, Meta’s global affairs chief, went further, declaring that Meta would not sign the Code in its current form due to excessive compliance requirements.

Moreover, US Vice President JD Vance echoed these concerns at the international AI Action Summit in Paris, arguing that Europe should focus on embracing AI’s growth potential rather than overly regulating it.

Concerns from Startups and Investors

The discontent with Europe’s regulatory framework extends beyond big tech, as investors and startup founders express frustration over the compliance burdens that stifle the growth of European AI startups. A proposed solution, dubbed the “28th regime,” aims to introduce EU-wide rules, simplifying compliance across member states.

Industry leaders, including Stripe CEO Patrick Collison and Wise co-founder Taavet Hinrikus, support the initiative to create a unified legal structure that favors AI startups, allowing them to focus on innovation rather than navigating complex regulations.

European AI Market Performance

Despite regulatory challenges, European tech firms have shown resilience, outperforming expectations in recent earnings reports. The technology sub-sector in the MSCI Europe Index recorded a remarkable 5.5% earnings growth in Q4, driven by rising demand for AI solutions. This growth contrasts with traditional sectors like pharma and banking, which have historically dominated earnings.

However, analysts caution that external factors, such as US tariffs and economic slowdowns in China and Europe, could impede continued progress. Chipmakers, particularly Infineon and STMicro, may face significant setbacks due to tariff pressures.

Looking Ahead: NVIDIA and Other AI Stocks

As tech stocks remain in focus, NVIDIA stands out with its upcoming Q4 earnings report anticipated on February 26, 2025. While NVIDIA’s stock has seen fluctuations, analysts maintain a bullish outlook, citing long-term growth catalysts in AI products and expansions in robotics and quantum computing.

Similarly, Marvell Technology is gaining attention ahead of its fiscal Q4 earnings report in March, with analysts optimistic about its AI revenue targets. Dell and Workday are also expected to discuss AI-related developments in their upcoming earnings calls, showcasing the ongoing relevance of AI in enterprise applications.

Overall, while Europe’s AI regulations continue to stir controversy, the market’s performance and the push for more streamlined policies indicate a critical juncture for the future of AI in the region.

More Insights

Understanding the EU AI Act: Key Highlights and Implications

The EU's Artificial Intelligence Act categorizes AI systems based on their risk levels, prohibiting high-risk systems and imposing strict regulations on those deemed high-risk. The legislation aims to...

Tech Giants Clash with EU Over AI Transparency: Creatives Demand Fair Compensation

The European Union's AI Act, the world's first law regulating artificial intelligence, requires AI companies to notify rightsholders when their works are used for training algorithms. As tech giants...

The Dangers of AI-Washing in Nutrition

AI-washing is a deceptive marketing tactic where companies exaggerate the role of AI in promoting their products or services, potentially misleading consumers. As AI becomes more integrated into the...

Understanding the Implications of the AI Act for Businesses

The AI Act, published by the EU, establishes the world's first comprehensive legal framework governing artificial intelligence, requiring businesses to identify and categorize their AI systems for...

Establishing AI Guardrails for Compliance and Trust

As the EU's AI Act comes into full force in 2026, businesses globally will face challenges due to the lack of standardisation in AI regulation, creating compliance uncertainty. Implementing AI...

Arkansas Protects Citizens with New AI Likeness Law

Arkansas has enacted HB1071, a law aimed at protecting individuals from unauthorized AI-generated likenesses for commercial use, requiring explicit consent for such replication. This legislation...

Tech Giants Resist Key Changes to EU AI Regulations

The EU AI Act is regarded as the most comprehensive set of regulations for artificial intelligence, yet it lacks specific implementation details. Currently, tech giants are pushing back against the...

Connecticut’s Crucial AI Regulation Debate

The ongoing public hearing in Hartford focuses on the need for regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in Connecticut, emphasizing the potential risks of unchecked technology. Supporters...

Promoting Inclusive AI Through Evidence-Based Action

The essay discusses the need for inclusive AI practices and the importance of reviewing evidence from diverse public voices to ensure that marginalized groups are represented in AI decision-making. It...