Big Tech’s Battle with Europe’s Strict AI Regulations

Tech Giants Critique Europe’s AI Regulations

At the Techarena conference in Stockholm on February 20, 2025, executives from leading US tech companies, Meta and Google, openly criticized Europe’s AI Act and GDPR, arguing that these regulations are hindering innovation and competitiveness in the region.

Delays and Compliance Issues

Chris Yiu, Meta’s public policy chief, highlighted the negative impact of European regulations on product launches. He stated, “There is now broad consensus that European regulation around technology has its issues. And the result is products get delayed or watered down. European consumers lose.” This sentiment was echoed with an example of Meta’s AI-powered Ray-Ban glasses, which experienced significant delays in their European launch due to regulatory challenges.

Yiu explained how the glasses, designed to translate speech in real-time and assist the visually impaired, faced months of legal complications to comply with the EU’s regulatory framework before being launched in select countries in November 2023.

Challenges with GDPR

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) also posed hurdles. Meta reported difficulties in legally utilizing user data from Instagram and Facebook to train AI models without violating privacy laws. This illustrates the complex landscape tech companies must navigate to operate in Europe.

Outdated Regulations

Dorothy Chou, head of public policy at Google DeepMind, criticized the AI Act for being outdated, noting that it was drafted in April 2021, well before the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022. “You can’t regulate AI with outdated rules. The tech moves too fast,” she asserted, suggesting that the current framework fails to keep pace with technological advancements.

Chou contrasted this with the US Inflation Reduction Act, which promotes investment and innovation rather than imposing stringent restrictions. She emphasized that policy can be structured to foster a conducive environment for AI development while ensuring responsible practices.

Industry Reactions

Kent Walker, Google’s president of global affairs, criticized the EU’s new AI Code of Practice, describing it as “a step in the wrong direction.” Joel Kaplan, Meta’s global affairs chief, went further, declaring that Meta would not sign the Code in its current form due to excessive compliance requirements.

Moreover, US Vice President JD Vance echoed these concerns at the international AI Action Summit in Paris, arguing that Europe should focus on embracing AI’s growth potential rather than overly regulating it.

Concerns from Startups and Investors

The discontent with Europe’s regulatory framework extends beyond big tech, as investors and startup founders express frustration over the compliance burdens that stifle the growth of European AI startups. A proposed solution, dubbed the “28th regime,” aims to introduce EU-wide rules, simplifying compliance across member states.

Industry leaders, including Stripe CEO Patrick Collison and Wise co-founder Taavet Hinrikus, support the initiative to create a unified legal structure that favors AI startups, allowing them to focus on innovation rather than navigating complex regulations.

European AI Market Performance

Despite regulatory challenges, European tech firms have shown resilience, outperforming expectations in recent earnings reports. The technology sub-sector in the MSCI Europe Index recorded a remarkable 5.5% earnings growth in Q4, driven by rising demand for AI solutions. This growth contrasts with traditional sectors like pharma and banking, which have historically dominated earnings.

However, analysts caution that external factors, such as US tariffs and economic slowdowns in China and Europe, could impede continued progress. Chipmakers, particularly Infineon and STMicro, may face significant setbacks due to tariff pressures.

Looking Ahead: NVIDIA and Other AI Stocks

As tech stocks remain in focus, NVIDIA stands out with its upcoming Q4 earnings report anticipated on February 26, 2025. While NVIDIA’s stock has seen fluctuations, analysts maintain a bullish outlook, citing long-term growth catalysts in AI products and expansions in robotics and quantum computing.

Similarly, Marvell Technology is gaining attention ahead of its fiscal Q4 earnings report in March, with analysts optimistic about its AI revenue targets. Dell and Workday are also expected to discuss AI-related developments in their upcoming earnings calls, showcasing the ongoing relevance of AI in enterprise applications.

Overall, while Europe’s AI regulations continue to stir controversy, the market’s performance and the push for more streamlined policies indicate a critical juncture for the future of AI in the region.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...