Balancing AI Management: IT vs. HR Responsibilities

Who Manages AI Agents: IT or HR?

As AI-powered agents become increasingly integrated into business operations, organizations are faced with a pressing challenge: determining who should manage these AI-driven systems—IT or HR?

AI is no longer confined to back-end automation; it actively participates in customer service, recruitment, data analysis, and even strategic decision-making. With AI increasingly influencing both operational efficiency and workplace culture, companies must decide which department is better suited to oversee its performance, ethical considerations, and continuous optimization.

THE CASE FOR IT: THE ARCHITECTS OF AI

Historically, IT has been the backbone of technological implementation and maintenance, ensuring that systems remain secure, efficient, and compliant. Given that AI agents are fundamentally software-driven entities, IT naturally assumes responsibility for their infrastructure, security, and regulatory adherence.

IT teams play a critical role in:

  • Maintaining AI Reliability And Accuracy: AI models should be monitored and fine-tuned to prevent performance degradation over time. IT ensures seamless integration with existing business systems and databases.
  • Managing Security Risks: AI interacts with vast amounts of sensitive data, from customer records to financial analytics. IT safeguards against cybersecurity threats, unauthorized access, and AI-generated misinformation.
  • Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: AI governance must align with evolving laws like GDPR, the EU AI Act, and corporate AI ethics policies. IT tracks and enforces compliance protocols to mitigate legal risks.

However, while IT ensures AI functions properly, it doesn’t always address the human impact of AI in the workplace. This is where HR comes in.

THE CASE FOR HR: THE ARCHITECTS OF PEOPLE AND CULTURE

HR has traditionally been responsible for managing employees, but what happens when AI agents begin acting as digital coworkers and influencing hiring decisions, workload distribution, and even employee evaluations? As AI increasingly interacts with the workforce, HR should step in to oversee its role in shaping workplace dynamics.

HR’s responsibilities in AI governance include:

  • Preventing AI Bias In Hiring And Performance Evaluation: AI-powered hiring tools have been found to exhibit gender and racial biases if not carefully managed. HR must ensure fairness and ethical AI-driven decision-making.
  • Facilitating Human-AI Collaboration: Employees need to adapt to working alongside AI tools. HR can lead training programs to ensure AI enhances, rather than replaces, human skills.
  • Assessing AI’s Impact On Company Culture: If AI is dictating employee productivity metrics or handling customer interactions, then HR should ensure that it aligns with company values and enhances, rather than diminishes, workplace morale.

A SHARED RESPONSIBILITY: THE AI OVERSIGHT CONVERGENCE

The reality is that AI management is not an either-or question. Rather, it’s a shared responsibility between IT and HR. Just as HR collaborates with IT when rolling out employee management software, AI oversight requires a cross-functional approach.

Forward-thinking organizations are forming AI governance committees, which bring together IT, HR, legal, and operations leaders to set ethical AI policies and guidelines, regularly audit AI decisions for bias and unintended consequences, and define best practices for human-AI collaboration.

For instance, Microsoft has established an AI Ethics and Effects in Engineering and Research (AETHER) Committee, which includes experts across multiple disciplines to ensure AI aligns with ethical principles while meeting technical performance standards.

WHAT’S NEXT? THE RISE OF AI MANAGEMENT ROLES

As AI agents become a permanent part of the workforce, new leadership roles are likely to emerge to bridge the gap between IT’s technical oversight and HR’s focus on workplace impact.

Companies may introduce positions such as:

  • Chief AI Ethics Officer: Responsible for ensuring AI-driven decisions align with ethical standards and corporate values.
  • AI Workforce Manager: Oversees how AI interacts with human employees to ensure fairness and productivity.
  • AI Governance Director: Develops policies that balance AI’s benefits with potential risks.

By proactively defining AI management responsibilities today, businesses can shape AI as a force for innovation, efficiency, and ethical business practices.

THE BIGGER QUESTION: STRUCTURING AI OVERSIGHT FOR THE FUTURE

The question isn’t just “Should IT or HR manage AI agents?” but “How should companies structure AI oversight to maximize its benefits while mitigating risks?” The businesses that establish clear AI governance strategies now are most likely to be the ones leading the future of work.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...