Balancing AI Management: IT vs. HR Responsibilities

Who Manages AI Agents: IT or HR?

As AI-powered agents become increasingly integrated into business operations, organizations are faced with a pressing challenge: determining who should manage these AI-driven systems—IT or HR?

AI is no longer confined to back-end automation; it actively participates in customer service, recruitment, data analysis, and even strategic decision-making. With AI increasingly influencing both operational efficiency and workplace culture, companies must decide which department is better suited to oversee its performance, ethical considerations, and continuous optimization.

THE CASE FOR IT: THE ARCHITECTS OF AI

Historically, IT has been the backbone of technological implementation and maintenance, ensuring that systems remain secure, efficient, and compliant. Given that AI agents are fundamentally software-driven entities, IT naturally assumes responsibility for their infrastructure, security, and regulatory adherence.

IT teams play a critical role in:

  • Maintaining AI Reliability And Accuracy: AI models should be monitored and fine-tuned to prevent performance degradation over time. IT ensures seamless integration with existing business systems and databases.
  • Managing Security Risks: AI interacts with vast amounts of sensitive data, from customer records to financial analytics. IT safeguards against cybersecurity threats, unauthorized access, and AI-generated misinformation.
  • Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: AI governance must align with evolving laws like GDPR, the EU AI Act, and corporate AI ethics policies. IT tracks and enforces compliance protocols to mitigate legal risks.

However, while IT ensures AI functions properly, it doesn’t always address the human impact of AI in the workplace. This is where HR comes in.

THE CASE FOR HR: THE ARCHITECTS OF PEOPLE AND CULTURE

HR has traditionally been responsible for managing employees, but what happens when AI agents begin acting as digital coworkers and influencing hiring decisions, workload distribution, and even employee evaluations? As AI increasingly interacts with the workforce, HR should step in to oversee its role in shaping workplace dynamics.

HR’s responsibilities in AI governance include:

  • Preventing AI Bias In Hiring And Performance Evaluation: AI-powered hiring tools have been found to exhibit gender and racial biases if not carefully managed. HR must ensure fairness and ethical AI-driven decision-making.
  • Facilitating Human-AI Collaboration: Employees need to adapt to working alongside AI tools. HR can lead training programs to ensure AI enhances, rather than replaces, human skills.
  • Assessing AI’s Impact On Company Culture: If AI is dictating employee productivity metrics or handling customer interactions, then HR should ensure that it aligns with company values and enhances, rather than diminishes, workplace morale.

A SHARED RESPONSIBILITY: THE AI OVERSIGHT CONVERGENCE

The reality is that AI management is not an either-or question. Rather, it’s a shared responsibility between IT and HR. Just as HR collaborates with IT when rolling out employee management software, AI oversight requires a cross-functional approach.

Forward-thinking organizations are forming AI governance committees, which bring together IT, HR, legal, and operations leaders to set ethical AI policies and guidelines, regularly audit AI decisions for bias and unintended consequences, and define best practices for human-AI collaboration.

For instance, Microsoft has established an AI Ethics and Effects in Engineering and Research (AETHER) Committee, which includes experts across multiple disciplines to ensure AI aligns with ethical principles while meeting technical performance standards.

WHAT’S NEXT? THE RISE OF AI MANAGEMENT ROLES

As AI agents become a permanent part of the workforce, new leadership roles are likely to emerge to bridge the gap between IT’s technical oversight and HR’s focus on workplace impact.

Companies may introduce positions such as:

  • Chief AI Ethics Officer: Responsible for ensuring AI-driven decisions align with ethical standards and corporate values.
  • AI Workforce Manager: Oversees how AI interacts with human employees to ensure fairness and productivity.
  • AI Governance Director: Develops policies that balance AI’s benefits with potential risks.

By proactively defining AI management responsibilities today, businesses can shape AI as a force for innovation, efficiency, and ethical business practices.

THE BIGGER QUESTION: STRUCTURING AI OVERSIGHT FOR THE FUTURE

The question isn’t just “Should IT or HR manage AI agents?” but “How should companies structure AI oversight to maximize its benefits while mitigating risks?” The businesses that establish clear AI governance strategies now are most likely to be the ones leading the future of work.

More Insights

Responsible AI in Finance: From Theory to Practice

The global discussion around artificial intelligence in finance has shifted towards responsible usage, emphasizing the importance of trust, compliance, and education. Startups like WNSTN AI are...

Building Trust in AI Through Certification for a Sustainable Future

The article discusses how certification can enhance trust in AI systems, transforming regulation from a constraint into a competitive advantage in the market. With frameworks like the EU's AI Act...

Trust in Explainable AI: Building Transparency and Accountability

Explainable AI (XAI) is crucial for fostering trust and transparency in critical fields like healthcare and finance, as regulations now require clear explanations of AI decisions. By empowering users...

Regulating AI: Balancing Innovation and Safety

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a revolutionary technology that presents both immense potential and significant risks, particularly due to the opacity of its algorithms. Without regulation, AI can...

Responsible AI Workflows for Transforming UX Research

The article discusses how AI can transform UX research by improving efficiency and enabling deeper insights, while emphasizing the importance of human oversight to avoid biases and inaccuracies. It...

Revolutionizing Banking with Agentic AI

Agentic AI is transforming the banking sector by automating complex processes, enhancing customer experiences, and ensuring regulatory compliance. However, it also introduces challenges related to...

AI-Driven Compliance: The Future of Scalable Crypto Infrastructure

The explosive growth of the crypto industry has brought about numerous regulatory challenges, making AI-native compliance systems essential for scalability and operational efficiency. These systems...

ASEAN’s Evolving AI Governance Landscape

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is making progress toward AI governance through an innovation-friendly approach, but growing AI-related risks highlight the need for more binding...

EU AI Act vs. US AI Action Plan: A Risk Perspective

Dr. Cari Miller discusses the differences between the EU AI Act and the US AI Action Plan, highlighting that the EU framework is much more risk-aware and imposes binding obligations on high-risk AI...