AI’s Impact on Administrative Law: Insights from the Symposium

Introduction to the Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and the Administrative Procedure Act

This post serves as the inaugural contribution to a symposium focusing on the intersection of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). For additional posts in the series, click here.

The Growing Role of AI in Federal Agencies

In recent years, federal agencies have increasingly integrated AI and machine learning systems into their operations, with indications that the role of AI in administrative decision-making is expanding. The White House has urged for the acceleration of federal AI usage, prompting various agencies to adopt AI technologies.

For instance, the Department of Veterans Affairs leveraged AI to streamline contract evaluations, while the Secretary of Defense pledged to incorporate multiple AI systems within Pentagon networks. Notably, several agencies have granted their employees access to AI chatbots to enhance operational efficiency.

AI’s Influence on Policymaking

AI is now making significant inroads into policymaking. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has announced plans to utilize AI for reviewing public comments on proposed regulations. Similarly, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is encouraging AI applications to analyze grid policy. The Small Business Administration used a large language model to identify regulations impacting small businesses. Recently, the VA hinted at using AI in a final rule but did not disclose specific details.

In a more ambitious proposal, the U.S. Department of General Services suggested using AI to rescind half of all federal regulations, while the Department of Transportation is reportedly considering Google Gemini for drafting rules.

Questions Surrounding Government Use of AI

The array of questions regarding government AI usage is nearly limitless, touching on issues of data governance, privacy, bias, conflicts of interest, procurement, civil service, and public trust. This symposium specifically addresses administrative law, focusing on the implications of the APA, which governs the exercise of discretion and judgment by agencies in executing statutory directives from Congress.

One key question arises: What occurs when long-established good government doctrines of administrative law are applied to agency actions that rely on new algorithmic systems? It may be that agencies simply adopt the latest technology to enhance their capabilities while fulfilling administrative law requirements. Alternatively, AI tools could undermine state capacity, reduce political accountability, and lead to arbitrary policy decisions. A combination of both outcomes is also possible.

A Symposium for All Perspectives

This symposium caters to AI skeptics, believers, and everyone in between. A diverse series of essays will be presented, featuring insights from both academics and practitioners. Some contributions will address core doctrinal questions regarding how agency use of AI interacts with administrative law, particularly in light of rapidly advancing technology. Others will consider normative questions about how agency use of AI aligns with the objectives of administrative law and the responsible realization of its benefits.

Additionally, reports will be presented on how regulators in the United States and abroad are adapting to AI and deploying it prudently. The symposium aims to initiate discussions that could help clarify the pressing questions surrounding this evolving field.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...