AI Super PACs Clash Over Midterm Influence

The AI Super PAC Fight That Might Shape the Midterms

An artificial intelligence industry PAC plans to pour over $100 million into this year’s midterm elections in hopes of getting more industry-friendly lawmakers into office, but the path to an AI-friendly Congress might not be an easy one.

Targeting Political Candidates

Its first target is Alex Bores, a Democrat running to replace retiring Rep. Jerry Nadler in New York. Bores, a former Palantir engineer, successfully pushed the RAISE Act, one of the first state-level AI safety laws. If elected to the House, he aims to implement more safety regulations for AI development, chatbots, and data centers.

These views have earned him opposition from Leading the Future, a super PAC network that intends to influence AI policy in Washington. The PAC released an ad targeting Bores over his pro-AI regulation stances late last year.

Spending and Influence

Bores acknowledges that the spending planned by Leading the Future is outsized but unsurprising. He stated, “These are people who want unbridled control over the American workforce or American education system, over our utility bills, over our climate… while $100 million is an insane amount for anyone to be spending, in some sense it’s just a venture capital investment for them, because their returns could be trillions.”

Leading the Future is backed by major donors to President Donald Trump, including Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale, venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, and OpenAI co-founder Greg Brockman. The super PAC aims to replicate the successful influence of the crypto industry in shaping a friendlier Congress.

Countering Public Skepticism

Despite its financial power and influential backers, Leading the Future faces public skepticism towards AI and wealthy pro-regulation donors. Another super PAC, Public First, plans to support candidates who advocate for AI regulation from both parties, pledging $50 million to this cause.

Public First aims to help candidates feel confident in engaging with AI policy discussions, as expressed by spokesperson Carson: “It’s like, ‘You don’t need to fear that the Death Star is gonna show up at your doorstep and destroy you if you even engage the AI policy question.’”

Lessons from the Crypto Industry

Leading the Future is co-led by Josh Vlasto, a former adviser to the crypto-affiliated super PAC Fairshake. In 2024, the crypto industry spent over $130 million in elections, which helped unseat former Senator Sherrod Brown and support pro-crypto candidates.

The AI industry hopes to gain similar ground within Congress. It has secured major concessions from Trump, including executive actions aimed at curbing state-level AI laws and allowing NVIDIA to sell advanced AI chips to China, both significant wins for the industry.

The Road Ahead

However, the AI industry did not secure any significant victories in Congress last year, failing to pass a moratorium on state regulations for AI development. A spokesperson for Leading the Future stated, “We plan to back leaders who will set aside politics to establish a clear, consistent national framework that will help us remain a leader in AI innovation and win the race against China.”

Bores argues that AI regulation does not necessarily impede innovation. He emphasizes the need to address real concerns surrounding AI while ensuring that American voices are heard in shaping this rapidly evolving technology.

The Growing Importance of AI Policy

Bores anticipates that AI policy will become increasingly significant to voters, especially if the technology leads to job losses or other negative impacts. He remarked, “I expected [AI] to get even more salient… it’s affecting every part of people’s lives.”

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...