AI Regulation in 2025: Navigating a New Landscape of Power and Policy

How AI Regulation Could Evolve in 2025

The landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) regulation is anticipated to undergo significant changes in 2025, driven by shifts in the U.S. political environment and differing approaches from global jurisdictions. This study examines the potential implications of these changes and highlights key developments to watch.

U.S. Political Landscape and AI Regulation

The inauguration of President-elect Donald Trump on January 20, 2025, is expected to have major implications for AI regulation in the United States. With a cabinet that includes influential figures from the tech industry, such as Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, there’s a potential for a more industry-friendly approach to AI policy.

Despite AI not being a prominent issue during Trump’s campaign, it is predicted to become a focal point of the new administration. Musk’s experience as a co-founder of OpenAI and his leadership at xAI indicate that he may advocate for measures to ensure AI development aligns with societal safety.

State of AI Regulation in the U.S.

Currently, the U.S. lacks a comprehensive federal AI legislation, resulting in a fragmented regulatory landscape characterized by various state and local laws. Over 45 states have introduced diverse AI-related bills.

Comparative International Regulation

While the U.S. is moving towards potential regulatory changes, the European Union (EU) has already established a framework with its landmark AI Act. This legislation aims to impose strict regulations on AI systems, causing significant concern among U.S. tech companies.

The EU AI Act

The EU AI Act is the first comprehensive regulatory framework for AI globally. Although it is not fully implemented, it has already sparked tension with large tech firms worried about its stringent requirements. The second draft of the code of practice for general-purpose AI (GPAI) models includes:

  • Exemptions for open-source AI models
  • Mandatory risk assessments for “systemic” GPAI models

As the EU continues to refine its regulations, the tech community is closely monitoring developments, especially concerning provisions that cover high-risk AI applications.

UK’s Approach to AI Regulation

In the UK, the government is considering legislation that could lead to a more principles-based approach to AI regulation, contrasting with the EU’s risk-based framework. Recently, the UK government announced a consultation on regulating the use of copyrighted content in AI training, which could set a precedent for how copyright law interacts with AI development.

Geopolitical Tensions and AI

As the U.S. and China continue to vie for technological supremacy, the regulation of AI could become a contentious issue. Previous administrations have enacted policies to restrict Chinese access to American technologies, which could escalate under Trump’s leadership.

Experts warn that a fracture between the U.S. and China in AI development might lead to an environment where each country develops advanced AI systems independently, raising concerns about safety and ethical standards.

Conclusion

The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence is poised for transformative changes in 2025. With different approaches taken by the U.S., EU, and UK, the future of AI regulation will depend on how these jurisdictions navigate their respective priorities and the geopolitical dynamics at play. Observers should pay close attention to the developments in policy-making, as they will significantly influence the trajectory of AI technology and its societal impact.

More Insights

Harnessing Trusted Data for AI Success in Telecommunications

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming the telecommunications sector by enhancing operations and delivering value through innovations like IoT services and smart cities. However, the...

Morocco’s Leadership in Global AI Governance

Morocco has taken an early lead in advancing global AI governance, as stated by Ambassador Omar Hilale during a recent round table discussion. The Kingdom aims to facilitate common views and encourage...

Regulating AI: The Ongoing Battle for Control

The article discusses the ongoing debate over AI regulation, emphasizing the recent passage of legislation that could impact state-level control over AI. It highlights the tension between innovation...

AI Readiness Framework for the Pharmaceutical Industry

This article presents an AI readiness assessment framework tailored for the pharmaceutical industry, emphasizing the importance of aligning AI initiatives with regulatory standards and ethical...

Enhancing AI Safety through Responsible Alignment

The post discusses the development of phi-3-mini in alignment with Microsoft's responsible AI principles, focusing on safety measures such as post-training safety alignment and red-teaming. It...

Mastering Sovereign AI Clouds in Intelligent Manufacturing

Sovereign AI clouds provide essential control and compliance for manufacturers, ensuring that their proprietary data remains secure and localized. As the demand for AI-driven solutions grows, managed...

Empowering Ethical AI in Scotland

The Scottish AI Alliance has released its 2024/2025 Impact Report, showcasing significant progress in promoting ethical and inclusive artificial intelligence across Scotland. The report highlights...

EU AI Act: Embrace Compliance and Prepare for Change

The recent announcement from the EU Commission confirming that there will be no delay to the EU AI Act has sparked significant reactions, with many claiming both failure and victory. Companies are...

Exploring Trustworthiness in Large Language Models Under the EU AI Act

This systematic mapping study evaluates the trustworthiness of large language models (LLMs) in the context of the EU AI Act, highlighting their capabilities and the challenges they face. The research...