AI Policy Shifts Under the Trump Administration

AI Trends for 2026 – The Federal Government’s Use and Regulation of AI

Throughout 2025, the Trump administration has tried to shape the direction of national AI policy through a series of executive orders and agency directives. In July 2025, President Trump issued the AI Action Plan along with three executive orders:

  • Preventing Woke AI in the Federal Government
  • Accelerating Federal Permitting of Data Center Infrastructure
  • Promoting the Export of the American AI Technology Stack

These actions aim to reduce (and potentially even eliminate) perceived obstacles to AI development, which the administration believes will cause the U.S. to fall behind its competitors. For companies that develop or deploy AI, these initiatives signal a federal push toward faster infrastructure approvals and a more government-aligned approach to AI exports.

Uniform AI Policy Framework

In early December 2025, President Trump signed Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence, an executive order seeking to preempt state-level AI laws and regulations with a yet-to-be-developed uniform AI policy framework. The order also calls for this uniform AI policy framework to be drafted in the form of a legislative recommendation.

Additionally, the order establishes a new AI Litigation Task Force within the Department of Justice and proposes to deny broadband grant funding to states deemed to have non-compliant laws. Companies operating across multiple states should begin assessing which compliance obligations are tied to state rules and prepare for potential realignment once a federal standard emerges.

The new Task Force also suggests a heightened enforcement environment, so those companies should review marketing materials, technical claims, and procurement certifications now to ensure defensibility.

Preventing “Woke AI” in Federal Procurement

As part of the effort to prevent federal agencies from procuring “woke AI,” the Office of Management and Budget issued a memorandum to ensure that AI technology purchased by the federal government produces truthful outputs that do not “manipulate responses in favor of ideological dogmas.”

Large language models (LLMs) are to “prioritize historical accuracy, scientific inquiry, and objectivity, and shall acknowledge uncertainty where reliable information is incomplete or contradictory.” The December 11, 2025 memorandum directs federal agencies to update their internal policies and procedures by March 11, 2026 to ensure they only purchase unbiased AI and LLM software and modify existing contracts where appropriate.

These directives impose significant new documentation and transparency requirements on developers, resellers, deployers, operators, and integrators of AI systems. Vendors will need to provide detailed LLM training process summaries and identified risks and mitigations to enable federal agencies to evaluate compliance.

Prospective contractors should assemble a “federal-ready AI documentation package” now to reduce procurement friction and strengthen competitiveness. Contractors should also review their existing federal agreements to identify potentially material amendments and plan for renegotiation timelines.

These executive orders and the Action Plan represent a significant shift in the federal government’s approach to AI, potentially laying the groundwork for a more cohesive national strategy in the near future.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...