Shadow AI Governance Lags as AI Adoption Soars
This is a paid press release. Contact the press release distributor directly with any inquiries.
Introduction
A recent global survey conducted by Cato Networks has unveiled alarming gaps in AI oversight among organizations. The study, which included over 600 IT leaders from North America, EMEA, and APJ, revealed that a staggering 69 percent of respondents lack a formal tracking system to monitor AI adoption.
Key Findings
The survey highlights a troubling disconnect between AI usage and governance. Notably, 61 percent of participants reported finding unauthorized AI tools within their environments. However, only 26 percent of organizations have implemented solutions to monitor AI usage. Nearly 49 percent either do not track AI usage at all or respond to it reactively.
Implications of AI Adoption
According to Etay Maor, chief security strategist at Cato Networks, “In many enterprises, AI adoption is happening from the bottom up.” Employees tend to gravitate towards AI tools that they find comfortable, believing they provide a productivity edge. Yet, without proper visibility and governance, enterprises inadvertently expand their attack surface.
AI Security Preparedness Falls Short
The research further exposes significant flaws in the way enterprises approach AI adoption. A remarkable 71 percent of respondents indicated that their primary motivation for adopting AI is to enhance productivity and efficiency. However, 69 percent admitted they lack a monitoring system for AI usage.
Most enterprises remain unaware of the AI tools their employees are utilizing, the data being shared, and the potential compliance risks that may arise. Alarmingly, only 13 percent of respondents consider their organization’s management of shadow AI risks to be ‘highly effective’. Furthermore, less than 10 percent believe they have a ‘highly effective’ defense against AI-generated cyber threats such as deepfakes and prompt injection attacks.
The Dangers of Shadow AI
Shadow AI operates similarly to shadow IT, where unauthorized technology is adopted to address immediate challenges. However, the associated risks concerning data processing, model training, and the absence of clear AI decision-making present substantial security concerns. IT leaders are acutely aware of the implications; 53 percent express high or extreme concern regarding AI security risks.
Conclusion
Maor emphasizes the urgency of the situation: “It is not a question of whether there is shadow AI usage within an enterprise, but whether you have the ability to detect it, govern it, and secure it before an issue arises.” The findings from this research indicate a pressing need for enterprises to take swift action to gain visibility and control over their AI usage.
As AI adoption continues to soar, the importance of robust governance frameworks cannot be overstated. Organizations must prioritize monitoring capabilities to mitigate the risks associated with shadow AI, ensuring they remain secure in an increasingly AI-driven landscape.
