AI Legislation and Governance in the Philippines 2026

2026 Laws Monitoring AI Use in the Philippines

The past year has seen significant legal and regulatory developments in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) in the Philippines as the government, alongside its partners and stakeholders, acknowledges the need for a comprehensive approach to governance, innovation, and competitiveness.

E-Governance Act

The Philippines recently enacted the E-Governance Act, which recognizes the necessity of leveraging information and communications technology in delivering public services to drive national development. One of the Act’s primary objectives is to foster an informed and data-driven decision-making process for policymakers through the use of data analytics.

Among the e-government programs to be developed under this law is the Human Capital Management Information System (HCMIS). This system aims to automate HR-related functions in government, utilizing analytics to provide insights for strategic HR functions such as performance management, forecasting, and succession planning. The government is keen on harnessing the benefits of automation, with AI opening doors for increased investment and partnerships with the private sector.

National AI Strategy Roadmap 2.0

In line with previous discussions on AI, one of the seven strategic imperatives under the country’s National AI Strategy Roadmap 2.0 (NAISR 2.0) focuses on transforming education and nurturing future AI talent. Recently, the Department of Education issued its Foundational Guidelines on Artificial Intelligence in Basic Education. This framework aims for the responsible integration of AI in basic education based on the principle of safe innovation.

Framework of the Guidelines

The guideline’s framework is anchored on three interrelated areas:

  1. AI in Education: This emphasizes human oversight, clarifying that AI is a support tool and not a substitute for professional judgment, alongside a requirement for transparency in using AI.
  2. Education on AI: This focuses on developing digital literacy, critical thinking, and ethical awareness among educators and learners, enabling them to interact with AI tools safely.
  3. AI for Education Systems: This covers the application of AI to enhance governance, planning, monitoring, and school operations.

Under the last area, the Department requires potential vendors to agree not to train models on its data, acknowledging the importance of partnerships and multisectoral collaborations.

Risk-Proportionate Regulation

One principle underpinning the guidelines is risk-proportionate regulation. The Department categorizes AI applications by risk level, applying stricter controls to high-risk uses while promoting safe innovations for tools categorized as minimal or limited risk. Risk classifications are determined by the system’s purpose and context rather than the specific user.

Before implementing AI technologies, schools must undergo a Digital Maturity Assessment, and the AI system must be registered with the Department’s AI Registry.

Konektadong Pinoy Act

Another strategic imperative under NAISR 2.0 is establishing a robust, connected environment. In this context, the Philippines enacted the Konektadong Pinoy (Connected Filipino) Act.

This law recognizes the importance of digital inclusivity and aims to narrow the digital divide by pursuing an “open access” policy for all qualified data transmission industry participants (DTIPs). These include VoIP service providers, internet service providers (ISPs), and satellite system providers. Qualified DTIPs can establish or lease their networks without requiring a congressional franchise, thereby facilitating greater access and connectivity.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...