AI Guidance Removal: Implications for Employers

Federal Laws Still Apply Despite AI Guidance Disappearance

In a sudden policy shift, several key artificial intelligence (AI) guidance documents from the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the US Department of Labor (DOL) have been removed from their agencies’ websites. This disappearance is particularly concerning as these documents were vital in helping employers navigate the complexities of using AI tools within the employment life cycle without violating existing employment laws.

The removal of these documents coincided with the new administration’s decision to roll back prior executive orders aimed at promoting responsible AI development and deployment. As a result, employers must now grapple with the implications of this shift.

Trump’s AI Executive Actions

On inauguration day, President Trump rescinded President Biden’s 2023 Executive Order No. 14110 on AI, which had mandated federal agencies to address safety, privacy, and discrimination concerns related to AI usage. Following this, Trump issued Executive Order No. 14179, which established a policy to “sustain and enhance America’s global AI dominance,” requiring regulators to submit action plans to achieve this goal.

These actions prompted both the EEOC and DOL to remove previously established guidance, raising concerns about the future of AI regulation in the workplace.

EEOC Guidance Removal

Under Commissioner Andrea Lucas, the EEOC has eliminated several critical documents from its website:

  • The May 2023 technical assistance document on AI compliance under Title VII, which advised employers to assess AI tools for potential adverse impacts on protected groups.
  • The May 2022 technical assistance document regarding potential violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) through AI usage.
  • The December 2024 fact sheet on wearable technology in the workplace, which highlighted potential ADA violations due to monitoring technologies.

Despite these removals, the agency’s Strategic Enforcement Plan for Fiscal Years 2024 – 2028 remains in effect, prioritizing the regulation of AI and technology usage in the workplace.

DOL Guidance Removal

Similarly, the DOL has removed significant guidance documents:

  • An April 2024 Field Assistance Bulletin detailing how AI use could violate various federal employment laws.
  • An October 2024 roadmap for best practices emphasizing AI principles aimed at worker well-being.

Moreover, the DOL’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance has also withdrawn its guidance on AI and equal employment opportunity for federal contractors, which was crucial for compliance monitoring.

Next Steps for Employers

Despite the absence of AI guidance, employers are reminded that:

  1. Federal, state, and local anti-discrimination laws still apply to AI usage. Employers must adhere to laws like Title VII, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), and the ADA, which prohibit discrimination based on protected classes.
  2. Monitoring state and local legislation is essential. As federal regulations become less stringent, states and local jurisdictions are stepping in to fill the regulatory gaps, with many proposing bills that impose strict auditing and transparency requirements.
  3. Continuing AI compliance programs is crucial. Employers should enhance their compliance measures, maintain oversight over AI tools, and ensure that employees receive training on the appropriate use of AI technologies.

As the landscape for AI regulation evolves, vigilance and proactive measures will be key for employers to navigate the complexities of AI in the workplace while adhering to legal standards.

More Insights

CII Advocates for Strong AI Accountability in Financial Services

The Chartered Insurance Institute (CII) has urged for clear accountability frameworks and a skills strategy for the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in financial services. They emphasize the...

Regulating AI in APAC MedTech: Current Trends and Future Directions

The regulatory landscape for AI-enabled MedTech in the Asia Pacific region is still developing, with existing frameworks primarily governing other technologies. While countries like China, Japan, and...

New York’s AI Legislation: Key Changes Employers Must Know

In early 2025, New York proposed the NY AI Act and the AI Consumer Protection Act to regulate the use of artificial intelligence, particularly addressing algorithmic discrimination in employment...

Managing AI Risks: Effective Frameworks for Safe Implementation

This article discusses the importance of AI risk management frameworks to mitigate potential risks associated with artificial intelligence systems. It highlights various types of risks, including...

Essential Insights on the EU Artificial Intelligence Act for Tech Companies

The European Union has introduced the Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), which aims to manage the risks and opportunities associated with AI technologies across Europe. This landmark regulation...

South Korea’s Landmark AI Basic Act: A New Era of Regulation

South Korea has established itself as a leader in AI regulation in Asia with the introduction of the AI Basic Act, which creates a comprehensive legal framework for artificial intelligence. This...

EU AI Act and DORA: Mastering Compliance in Financial Services

The EU AI Act and DORA are reshaping how financial entities manage AI risk by introducing new layers of compliance that demand transparency, accountability, and quantifiable risk assessments...

AI Governance: Bridging the Transatlantic Divide

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping economies, societies, and global governance, presenting both significant opportunities and risks. This chapter examines the divergent approaches of...

EU’s Ambitious Plan to Boost AI Development

The EU Commission is launching a new strategy to reduce barriers for the deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) across Europe, aiming to enhance the region's competitiveness on a global scale. The...