AI Guidance Removal: Implications for Employers

Federal Laws Still Apply Despite AI Guidance Disappearance

In a sudden policy shift, several key artificial intelligence (AI) guidance documents from the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the US Department of Labor (DOL) have been removed from their agencies’ websites. This disappearance is particularly concerning as these documents were vital in helping employers navigate the complexities of using AI tools within the employment life cycle without violating existing employment laws.

The removal of these documents coincided with the new administration’s decision to roll back prior executive orders aimed at promoting responsible AI development and deployment. As a result, employers must now grapple with the implications of this shift.

Trump’s AI Executive Actions

On inauguration day, President Trump rescinded President Biden’s 2023 Executive Order No. 14110 on AI, which had mandated federal agencies to address safety, privacy, and discrimination concerns related to AI usage. Following this, Trump issued Executive Order No. 14179, which established a policy to “sustain and enhance America’s global AI dominance,” requiring regulators to submit action plans to achieve this goal.

These actions prompted both the EEOC and DOL to remove previously established guidance, raising concerns about the future of AI regulation in the workplace.

EEOC Guidance Removal

Under Commissioner Andrea Lucas, the EEOC has eliminated several critical documents from its website:

  • The May 2023 technical assistance document on AI compliance under Title VII, which advised employers to assess AI tools for potential adverse impacts on protected groups.
  • The May 2022 technical assistance document regarding potential violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) through AI usage.
  • The December 2024 fact sheet on wearable technology in the workplace, which highlighted potential ADA violations due to monitoring technologies.

Despite these removals, the agency’s Strategic Enforcement Plan for Fiscal Years 2024 – 2028 remains in effect, prioritizing the regulation of AI and technology usage in the workplace.

DOL Guidance Removal

Similarly, the DOL has removed significant guidance documents:

  • An April 2024 Field Assistance Bulletin detailing how AI use could violate various federal employment laws.
  • An October 2024 roadmap for best practices emphasizing AI principles aimed at worker well-being.

Moreover, the DOL’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance has also withdrawn its guidance on AI and equal employment opportunity for federal contractors, which was crucial for compliance monitoring.

Next Steps for Employers

Despite the absence of AI guidance, employers are reminded that:

  1. Federal, state, and local anti-discrimination laws still apply to AI usage. Employers must adhere to laws like Title VII, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), and the ADA, which prohibit discrimination based on protected classes.
  2. Monitoring state and local legislation is essential. As federal regulations become less stringent, states and local jurisdictions are stepping in to fill the regulatory gaps, with many proposing bills that impose strict auditing and transparency requirements.
  3. Continuing AI compliance programs is crucial. Employers should enhance their compliance measures, maintain oversight over AI tools, and ensure that employees receive training on the appropriate use of AI technologies.

As the landscape for AI regulation evolves, vigilance and proactive measures will be key for employers to navigate the complexities of AI in the workplace while adhering to legal standards.

More Insights

US Rejects UN’s Call for Global AI Governance Framework

U.S. officials rejected the establishment of a global AI governance framework at the United Nations General Assembly, despite broad support from many nations, including China. Michael Kratsios of the...

Agentic AI: Managing the Risks of Autonomous Systems

As companies increasingly adopt agentic AI systems for autonomous decision-making, they face the emerging challenge of agentic AI sprawl, which can lead to security vulnerabilities and operational...

AI as a New Opinion Gatekeeper: Addressing Hidden Biases

As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into sectors like healthcare and finance, a new study highlights the potential for subtle biases in AI systems to distort public...

AI Accountability: A New Era of Regulation and Compliance

The burgeoning world of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is at a critical juncture as regulatory actions signal a new era of accountability and ethical deployment. Recent events highlight the shift...

Choosing Effective AI Governance Tools for Safer Adoption

As generative AI continues to evolve, so do the associated risks, making AI governance tools essential for managing these challenges. This initiative, in collaboration with Tokio Marine Group, aims to...

UN Initiatives for Trustworthy AI Governance

The United Nations is working to influence global policy on artificial intelligence by establishing an expert panel to develop standards for "safe, secure and trustworthy" AI. This initiative aims to...

Data-Driven Governance: Shaping AI Regulation in Singapore

The conversation between Thomas Roehm from SAS and Frankie Phua from United Overseas Bank at the SAS Innovate On Tour in Singapore explores how data-driven regulation can effectively govern rapidly...

Preparing SMEs for EU AI Compliance Challenges

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) must navigate the complexities of the EU AI Act, which categorizes many AI applications as "high-risk" and imposes strict compliance requirements. To adapt...

Draft Guidance on Reporting Serious Incidents Under the EU AI Act

On September 26, 2025, the European Commission published draft guidance on serious incident reporting requirements for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act. Organizations developing or deploying...