AI Guidance Removal: Implications for Employers

Federal Laws Still Apply Despite AI Guidance Disappearance

In a sudden policy shift, several key artificial intelligence (AI) guidance documents from the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the US Department of Labor (DOL) have been removed from their agencies’ websites. This disappearance is particularly concerning as these documents were vital in helping employers navigate the complexities of using AI tools within the employment life cycle without violating existing employment laws.

The removal of these documents coincided with the new administration’s decision to roll back prior executive orders aimed at promoting responsible AI development and deployment. As a result, employers must now grapple with the implications of this shift.

Trump’s AI Executive Actions

On inauguration day, President Trump rescinded President Biden’s 2023 Executive Order No. 14110 on AI, which had mandated federal agencies to address safety, privacy, and discrimination concerns related to AI usage. Following this, Trump issued Executive Order No. 14179, which established a policy to “sustain and enhance America’s global AI dominance,” requiring regulators to submit action plans to achieve this goal.

These actions prompted both the EEOC and DOL to remove previously established guidance, raising concerns about the future of AI regulation in the workplace.

EEOC Guidance Removal

Under Commissioner Andrea Lucas, the EEOC has eliminated several critical documents from its website:

  • The May 2023 technical assistance document on AI compliance under Title VII, which advised employers to assess AI tools for potential adverse impacts on protected groups.
  • The May 2022 technical assistance document regarding potential violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) through AI usage.
  • The December 2024 fact sheet on wearable technology in the workplace, which highlighted potential ADA violations due to monitoring technologies.

Despite these removals, the agency’s Strategic Enforcement Plan for Fiscal Years 2024 – 2028 remains in effect, prioritizing the regulation of AI and technology usage in the workplace.

DOL Guidance Removal

Similarly, the DOL has removed significant guidance documents:

  • An April 2024 Field Assistance Bulletin detailing how AI use could violate various federal employment laws.
  • An October 2024 roadmap for best practices emphasizing AI principles aimed at worker well-being.

Moreover, the DOL’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance has also withdrawn its guidance on AI and equal employment opportunity for federal contractors, which was crucial for compliance monitoring.

Next Steps for Employers

Despite the absence of AI guidance, employers are reminded that:

  1. Federal, state, and local anti-discrimination laws still apply to AI usage. Employers must adhere to laws like Title VII, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), and the ADA, which prohibit discrimination based on protected classes.
  2. Monitoring state and local legislation is essential. As federal regulations become less stringent, states and local jurisdictions are stepping in to fill the regulatory gaps, with many proposing bills that impose strict auditing and transparency requirements.
  3. Continuing AI compliance programs is crucial. Employers should enhance their compliance measures, maintain oversight over AI tools, and ensure that employees receive training on the appropriate use of AI technologies.

As the landscape for AI regulation evolves, vigilance and proactive measures will be key for employers to navigate the complexities of AI in the workplace while adhering to legal standards.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...