AI Governance Under Scrutiny Ahead of India’s 2026 Summit

Ahead of India’s AI Impact Summit 2026: Concerns Over AI Governance

New Delhi: A report released ahead of the India AI Impact Summit 2026, scheduled to be held in New Delhi, has raised concerns about the country’s approach to AI governance.

Title and Overview

Titled India AI Impact Summit 2026: AI Governance at the Edge of Democratic Backsliding, the report, published by the Center for the Study of Organized Hate (CSOH) and the Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF), notes a gap between India’s stated commitment to inclusive and democratic AI and the reported use of AI systems in ways that affect minority and marginalized communities.

AI and Political Narratives

Highlighting the role of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in using such material, the report notes several instances where the BJP utilized AI-generated videos and images to spread communal narratives and target opposition leaders. A striking example cited is an AI-generated video uploaded by BJP’s Assam unit depicting the Chief Minister of Assam, Himanta Biswa Sarma, shooting at two visibly Muslim men, titled “No Mercy.” This video included a morphed image of opposition leader Gaurav Gogoi, which has since been deleted following widespread criticism.

Surveillance and Law Enforcement

Beyond online content, the report states that law enforcement agencies in several states are using facial recognition systems, predictive policing software, and other AI-based surveillance tools. These deployments reportedly lack independent oversight, judicial approval, and necessary transparency.

Targeting Vulnerable Communities

The report further discusses a collaboration between Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis and the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay to develop an AI system aimed at identifying alleged Bangladeshi immigrants and Rohingya refugees through analysis of speech patterns and language use. Experts warn that such technology could specifically target Bengali-speaking Muslim communities and low-income migrant workers from Assam and West Bengal. The document also mentions accounts of Bengali-speaking Muslim citizens being deported to Bangladesh without due process on suspicion of being undocumented migrants.

Critique of AI Governance Guidelines

The document reviews India’s AI Governance Guidelines issued in November 2025, noting that the framework relies on voluntary compliance rather than binding rules, prioritizing innovation over precaution. While the guidelines reference protecting vulnerable groups, the report indicates that they do not address specific risks faced by religious minorities, Dalit, Bahujan, Adivasi communities, and sexual and gender minorities. It concludes that affected communities are expected to challenge harmful AI systems without mandatory transparency requirements, which would enable such challenges.

Call to Action for the Summit

The AI Impact Summit 2026 is officially centered on “Democratizing AI” and “Bridging the AI Divide” through the themes of “People, Planet, and Progress.” The report urges leaders attending the summit to adopt enforceable regulations across the AI lifecycle, ban the use of AI for mass surveillance and predictive policing, require independent oversight of public-sector AI systems, and include affected communities in governance discussions. Furthermore, it calls for moving beyond voluntary commitments by technology companies toward stronger regulatory measures.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...