AI Governance Stalemate: US and China Decline Military Summit Declaration

US and China Skip AI Governance Declaration at Military Summit

As global concerns over the deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) in military contexts continue to rise, a significant summit held in A Coruna, Spain, on February 5, 2026, revealed a divided stance among participating nations. While approximately a third of the 85 countries in attendance agreed to a declaration aimed at governing AI technology in warfare, major military powers China and the United States opted out.

Concerns Over AI in Warfare

The reluctance of some countries to sign joint agreements stemmed from rising tensions between the United States and its European allies, alongside uncertainties regarding future transatlantic relations. Delegates expressed apprehension about the rapid advancement of AI technologies potentially outpacing existing governance frameworks, thereby increasing the risk of accidents, miscalculations, or unintended escalations in military conflicts.

Signatories and Their Commitments

The declaration underscores the growing concern among governments regarding the implications of fast-evolving AI technologies in military settings. According to Dutch Defence Minister Ruben Brekelmans, nations face a “prisoner’s dilemma”, balancing responsible regulations against the need to remain competitive with adversaries. He stated, “Russia and China are moving very fast. That creates urgency to make progress in developing AI. But seeing it going fast also increases the urgency to keep working on its responsible use. The two go hand-in-hand.”

Out of the 85 nations attending the summit, only 35 signed a commitment to adhere to 20 principles concerning AI governance. These principles include:

  • Affirming human responsibility over AI-powered weapons
  • Encouraging clear chains of command and control
  • Sharing information on national oversight arrangements where consistent with national security

The declaration also emphasizes the importance of conducting risk assessments, ensuring robust testing, and providing training and education for personnel operating military AI capabilities.

Previous Summits and Context

In contrast to this year’s summit, two prior gatherings in The Hague and Seoul in 2023 and 2024, respectively, saw around 60 nations, excluding China but including the United States, endorsing a modest “blueprint for action” without legal commitments. Although this year’s document was also non-binding, many delegates felt uneasy about endorsing more defined policies.

Major Signatories

Significant signatories of the declaration included Canada, Germany, France, Britain, The Netherlands, South Korea, and Ukraine. Their commitment reflects a collective recognition of the need for responsible governance as AI technology plays an increasingly pivotal role in military operations.

The developments from this summit highlight the complexities and urgent challenges facing global leaders in the realm of military AI governance.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...