AI Governance: Prioritizing Human Rights in an Automated World

AI Governance and Human Rights

As rapid advances in AI continue to evolve, global leaders are increasingly confronted with pressing questions regarding power, accountability, and the protection of fundamental freedoms in an automated world.

Key Discussions at the Internet Governance Forum 2025

During the Internet Governance Forum 2025 held in Lillestrøm, Norway, a pivotal session highlighted the launch of the Freedom Online Coalition’s (FOC) updated Joint Statement on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights. This statement, which is supported by 21 countries and counting, delineates a vision for human-centric AI governance grounded in international human rights law.

Participants from various sectors—including governments, civil society, and the tech industry—gathered to stress the urgent necessity for a multistakeholder approach to address the real and present risks that AI poses to rights such as privacy, freedom of expression, and democratic participation.

Interconnectedness of Human Rights and Security

Ambassador Ernst Noorman of the Netherlands emphasized that human rights and security must be viewed as interconnected. He cautioned that unregulated AI use could destabilize societies instead of providing protection, referencing the Netherlands’ own experiences with biased welfare algorithms.

Moreover, panellists including Germany’s Cyber Ambassador Maria Adebahr highlighted the alarming trend of AI being weaponized for transnational repression. Adebahr reiterated Germany’s commitment by doubling funding for the FOC.

The Role of Citizens and the Private Sector

Ghana’s cybersecurity chief, Divine Salese Agbeti, pointed out that the misuse of AI is not restricted to governments; citizens have also exploited this technology for manipulation and deception.

From the private sector, Microsoft’s Dr. Erika Moret presented the company’s comprehensive approach to embedding human rights in AI. This includes ethical design, impact assessments, and a refusal to engage in high-risk applications such as facial recognition in authoritarian contexts. Moret underscored the company’s adherence to UN guiding principles and the necessity for transparency, fairness, and inclusivity.

Global Frameworks and Calls to Action

The session also brought attention to essential global frameworks like the EU AI Act and the Council of Europe’s Framework Convention, advocating for their widespread adoption as critical tools in managing AI’s global impact. The discussion culminated in a shared call to action, urging governments to leverage regulatory tools and procurement power to uphold human rights standards in AI. Concurrently, the private sector and civil society are encouraged to advocate for accountability and inclusion.

The FOC’s statement remains open for new endorsements, serving as a foundational text in the ongoing endeavor to align the future of AI with the fundamental rights of all people.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...

AI in Australian Government: Balancing Innovation and Security Risks

The Australian government is considering using AI to draft sensitive cabinet submissions as part of a broader strategy to implement AI across the public service. While some public servants report...