AI Antitrust Enforcement: The Trump Administration’s Approach

Eyes on AI: Looking Ahead to Potential AI Antitrust Enforcement in the Trump Administration

As headlines about artificial intelligence dominate discussions in various sectors, there is growing concern among clients and practitioners about the implications of AI on antitrust risk. In the realm of private antitrust litigation in the United States, the answer is affirmative, as numerous class action lawsuits challenge the use of AI in pricing strategies.

Antitrust Regulation in the AI Space under the Biden Administration

The Biden Administration set a precedent for antitrust regulation in AI that the Trump Administration is now reshaping. Two significant executive orders from Biden highlighted the dual nature of AI: the potential for responsible use to drive progress and irresponsible use that could exacerbate issues like fraud and discrimination.

The October 2023 Executive Order aimed to ensure the safe development and use of AI, establishing eight guiding principles for federal agencies, including new reporting requirements for AI models and enhanced protections against AI-related IP risks.

Another crucial directive, issued in January 2025, focused on domestic AI infrastructure, urging coordination among federal agencies to prevent adversaries from exploiting AI systems detrimental to national security.

January 2025 FTC Report

The FTC’s Office of Technology published a report analyzing AI partnerships, particularly between major cloud service providers (CSPs) and AI developers. The report emphasized the implications of such partnerships, including possible limitations on access to essential resources and increased costs for AI developers.

Antitrust Regulation of AI in the Trump Administration

Upon taking office, President Trump revoked Biden’s October 2023 Executive Order and introduced his own, focusing on removing barriers to enhance America’s global AI dominance. The January 23 Executive Order emphasized a policy to develop AI systems free from ideological bias.

In July 2025, the Trump Administration unveiled the “Winning the Race: America’s AI Action Plan”, framing AI development as a new “space race” crucial for national security and economic competitiveness. This plan includes a review of all FTC investigations initiated under the previous administration to ensure they do not hinder AI innovation.

Viewpoint Discrimination: An Emerging Area of Interest

One notable focus for antitrust enforcement under Trump is viewpoint discrimination. For example, the DOJ Antitrust Division filed a statement in a case where online publishers alleged deplatforming for sharing non-mainstream viewpoints. This move signals a commitment to preserving diverse perspectives in the marketplace.

The administration’s stance suggests that AI markets will be scrutinized for potential content-based limitations, ensuring that innovation and competition flourish while protecting against monopolistic practices.

Conclusion

As the midterm and presidential elections approach, the role of AI in antitrust enforcement is likely to become a significant battleground. While the Trump Administration has rolled back many Biden-era regulations, it retains the framework to utilize antitrust tools, indicating a dual focus on promoting innovation while monitoring competitive practices in the evolving AI landscape.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...