AI Adoption in UK Finance: Balancing Innovation and Compliance

UK Finance Workers Embrace AI Amid Compliance Concerns

A recent survey highlights the rapid adoption of AI tools within the UK financial services sector, revealing both excitement and apprehension among workers regarding compliance and oversight.

Survey Findings

Conducted by Smarsh, the survey involved 2,000 employees from the financial services and insurance industries. It uncovered that while over a third of respondents regularly utilize AI tools like ChatGPT and Microsoft 365 Copilot, a significant 55% reported receiving no formal training on these technologies.

The growing reliance on AI without adequate governance raises alarms. Nearly 70% of participants expressed that they would feel more secure using AI if there were transparent tracking and monitoring of outputs. However, 38% were unaware if their companies monitor AI usage, and 21% confirmed that their firms do not.

Employee Perspectives

Tom Padgett, president of enterprise business at Smarsh, noted the rapid pace at which AI adoption has accelerated in financial services. He emphasized that employees are eager to leverage these tools to enhance productivity. However, he cautioned, “With innovation comes responsibility. Firms must establish the right guardrails to prevent data leaks and misconduct.”

The report also pointed out that employees are keen on fostering a safe and compliant AI environment, which they believe could build trust and facilitate long-term growth.

Concerns Over AI Agents

The study also revealed worries regarding the deployment of AI Agents, which are automated tools that manage customer service and investment tasks. Almost half of the respondents indicated that their firms employ AI Agents in customer communications, while 22% reported their use in investment decision-making.

However, a significant one-third of employees questioned their company’s capability to enforce regulations on these tools, and 29% expressed uncertainty about the handling of sensitive data.

The Risks of Public AI Tools

Paul Taylor, vice president of product at Smarsh, warned against using public AI tools without appropriate controls, labeling it as “digital negligence.” He stated, “You’re effectively feeding your crown jewels into a black box you don’t own, where the data can’t be deleted, and the logic can’t be explained. It’s reckless.”

He suggested that private tools like Microsoft 365 Copilot and ChatGPT Enterprise represent a positive step forward. Nonetheless, he stressed that if companies fail to capture and audit AI usage actively, they risk entering a compliance nightmare.

Addressing Compliance Needs

In response to these challenges, Smarsh is introducing AI-enabled compliance solutions, such as Capture for Microsoft 365 Copilot and ChatGPT Enterprise. These tools aim to assist firms in utilizing AI safely while ensuring compliance with relevant regulations.

The findings from this survey underscore the necessity for a balanced approach to AI adoption in the financial sector, where innovation must be accompanied by robust compliance measures to safeguard sensitive data and maintain trust.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...

AI in Australian Government: Balancing Innovation and Security Risks

The Australian government is considering using AI to draft sensitive cabinet submissions as part of a broader strategy to implement AI across the public service. While some public servants report...