AI Adoption in UK Finance: Balancing Innovation and Compliance

UK Finance Workers Embrace AI Amid Compliance Concerns

A recent survey highlights the rapid adoption of AI tools within the UK financial services sector, revealing both excitement and apprehension among workers regarding compliance and oversight.

Survey Findings

Conducted by Smarsh, the survey involved 2,000 employees from the financial services and insurance industries. It uncovered that while over a third of respondents regularly utilize AI tools like ChatGPT and Microsoft 365 Copilot, a significant 55% reported receiving no formal training on these technologies.

The growing reliance on AI without adequate governance raises alarms. Nearly 70% of participants expressed that they would feel more secure using AI if there were transparent tracking and monitoring of outputs. However, 38% were unaware if their companies monitor AI usage, and 21% confirmed that their firms do not.

Employee Perspectives

Tom Padgett, president of enterprise business at Smarsh, noted the rapid pace at which AI adoption has accelerated in financial services. He emphasized that employees are eager to leverage these tools to enhance productivity. However, he cautioned, “With innovation comes responsibility. Firms must establish the right guardrails to prevent data leaks and misconduct.”

The report also pointed out that employees are keen on fostering a safe and compliant AI environment, which they believe could build trust and facilitate long-term growth.

Concerns Over AI Agents

The study also revealed worries regarding the deployment of AI Agents, which are automated tools that manage customer service and investment tasks. Almost half of the respondents indicated that their firms employ AI Agents in customer communications, while 22% reported their use in investment decision-making.

However, a significant one-third of employees questioned their company’s capability to enforce regulations on these tools, and 29% expressed uncertainty about the handling of sensitive data.

The Risks of Public AI Tools

Paul Taylor, vice president of product at Smarsh, warned against using public AI tools without appropriate controls, labeling it as “digital negligence.” He stated, “You’re effectively feeding your crown jewels into a black box you don’t own, where the data can’t be deleted, and the logic can’t be explained. It’s reckless.”

He suggested that private tools like Microsoft 365 Copilot and ChatGPT Enterprise represent a positive step forward. Nonetheless, he stressed that if companies fail to capture and audit AI usage actively, they risk entering a compliance nightmare.

Addressing Compliance Needs

In response to these challenges, Smarsh is introducing AI-enabled compliance solutions, such as Capture for Microsoft 365 Copilot and ChatGPT Enterprise. These tools aim to assist firms in utilizing AI safely while ensuring compliance with relevant regulations.

The findings from this survey underscore the necessity for a balanced approach to AI adoption in the financial sector, where innovation must be accompanied by robust compliance measures to safeguard sensitive data and maintain trust.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...