AI Act Under Fire: Urgent Call for Caution in Europe

Big Tech’s Brussels Bulldog Urges Caution on AI Act

The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA Europe) has issued a cautionary statement to EU leaders regarding the implementation of the AI Act. The association expresses concerns over the potential risks of moving forward without a finalized framework.

Key Provisions at Risk

According to the CCIA, essential components of the EU AI Act, especially those pertaining to general-purpose AI (GPAI) models, are still lacking critical guidance. The rules are set to take effect on August 2, necessitating that GPAI model providers prepare technical documentation, copyright policies, and ensure dataset transparency by August 2026.

Importantly, if models are categorized as ‘systemic-risk’, they will be required to submit mandatory red-team reports and maintain incident logs.

Legislative Delays and Concerns

There are significant causes for concern regarding the timely rollout of the Act. The GPAI Code of Practice, promised by May 2, is still in limbo. Furthermore, official guidance from the European Parliament acknowledges that “several chapters… have other dates of application,” indicating that full effectiveness may not be achieved until 2027.

European Leaders’ Doubts

Several leaders within Europe have expressed skepticism about the AI Act. For instance, Sweden’s prime minister, Ulf Kristersson, has labeled the timeline as “confusing” and has called for a pause in the implementation process.

The Risk of a Rushed Rollout

The CCIA warns that a hasty implementation of the Act could jeopardize the EU’s ambitions in the AI sector. The European Commission projects that AI could yield a €3.4 trillion boost to the EU economy by 2030. However, the EU is already falling behind, capturing only six percent of global AI funding, in stark contrast to the 61 percent received by U.S. counterparts.

Additionally, a report from Stanford HAI highlights that U.S.-based institutions developed 40 notable AI models in 2024, while Europe managed only three.

Call for Action

Daniel Friedlaender, the senior vice president and head of office at CCIA Europe, remarked, “Europe cannot lead on AI with one foot on the brake. With critical parts of the AI Act still missing just weeks before rules kick in, we need a pause to get the Act right, or risk stalling innovation altogether.”

Moreover, Boniface de Champris, CCIA Europe’s senior policy manager, urged immediate action: “If the EU is serious about turning its €3.4 trillion AI promise into reality, it must act now. Reflecting growing concerns among governments and AI innovators, the Commission should be instructed to pause and simplify – giving companies a fair shot to comply and compete.”

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...