AI Act Under Fire: Urgent Call for Caution in Europe

Big Tech’s Brussels Bulldog Urges Caution on AI Act

The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA Europe) has issued a cautionary statement to EU leaders regarding the implementation of the AI Act. The association expresses concerns over the potential risks of moving forward without a finalized framework.

Key Provisions at Risk

According to the CCIA, essential components of the EU AI Act, especially those pertaining to general-purpose AI (GPAI) models, are still lacking critical guidance. The rules are set to take effect on August 2, necessitating that GPAI model providers prepare technical documentation, copyright policies, and ensure dataset transparency by August 2026.

Importantly, if models are categorized as ‘systemic-risk’, they will be required to submit mandatory red-team reports and maintain incident logs.

Legislative Delays and Concerns

There are significant causes for concern regarding the timely rollout of the Act. The GPAI Code of Practice, promised by May 2, is still in limbo. Furthermore, official guidance from the European Parliament acknowledges that “several chapters… have other dates of application,” indicating that full effectiveness may not be achieved until 2027.

European Leaders’ Doubts

Several leaders within Europe have expressed skepticism about the AI Act. For instance, Sweden’s prime minister, Ulf Kristersson, has labeled the timeline as “confusing” and has called for a pause in the implementation process.

The Risk of a Rushed Rollout

The CCIA warns that a hasty implementation of the Act could jeopardize the EU’s ambitions in the AI sector. The European Commission projects that AI could yield a €3.4 trillion boost to the EU economy by 2030. However, the EU is already falling behind, capturing only six percent of global AI funding, in stark contrast to the 61 percent received by U.S. counterparts.

Additionally, a report from Stanford HAI highlights that U.S.-based institutions developed 40 notable AI models in 2024, while Europe managed only three.

Call for Action

Daniel Friedlaender, the senior vice president and head of office at CCIA Europe, remarked, “Europe cannot lead on AI with one foot on the brake. With critical parts of the AI Act still missing just weeks before rules kick in, we need a pause to get the Act right, or risk stalling innovation altogether.”

Moreover, Boniface de Champris, CCIA Europe’s senior policy manager, urged immediate action: “If the EU is serious about turning its €3.4 trillion AI promise into reality, it must act now. Reflecting growing concerns among governments and AI innovators, the Commission should be instructed to pause and simplify – giving companies a fair shot to comply and compete.”

More Insights

G7 Summit Fails to Address Urgent AI Governance Needs

At the recent G7 summit in Canada, discussions primarily focused on economic opportunities related to AI, while governance issues for AI systems were notably overlooked. This shift towards...

Africa’s Bold Move Towards Sovereign AI Governance

At the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) 2025 in Oslo, African leaders called for urgent action to develop sovereign and ethical AI systems tailored to local needs, emphasizing the necessity for...

Top 10 Compliance Challenges in AI Regulations

As AI technology advances, the challenge of establishing effective regulations becomes increasingly complex, with different countries adopting varying approaches. This regulatory divergence poses...

China’s Unique Approach to Embodied AI

China's approach to artificial intelligence emphasizes the development of "embodied AI," which interacts with the physical environment, leveraging the country's strengths in manufacturing and...

Workday Sets New Standards in Responsible AI Governance

Workday has recently received dual third-party accreditations for its AI Governance Program, highlighting its commitment to responsible and transparent AI. Dr. Kelly Trindle, Chief Responsible AI...

AI Adoption in UK Finance: Balancing Innovation and Compliance

A recent survey by Smarsh reveals that while UK finance workers are increasingly adopting AI tools, there are significant concerns regarding compliance and oversight. Many employees express a desire...

AI Ethics Amid US-China Tensions: A Call for Global Standards

As the US-China tech rivalry intensifies, a UN agency is advocating for global AI ethics standards, highlighted during UNESCO's Global Forum on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Bangkok...

Mastering Compliance with the EU AI Act Through Advanced DSPM Solutions

The EU AI Act emphasizes the importance of compliance for organizations deploying AI technologies, with Zscaler’s Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) playing a crucial role in ensuring data...

US Lawmakers Push to Ban Adversarial AI Amid National Security Concerns

A bipartisan group of U.S. lawmakers has introduced the "No Adversarial AI Act," aiming to ban the use of artificial intelligence tools from countries like China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea in...