Africa’s Bold Move Towards Sovereign AI Governance

IGF 2025: Africa Charts a Sovereign Path for AI Governance

On June 27, 2025, a significant session was held at the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) in Oslo, focusing on the urgent need for sovereign and ethical AI systems in Africa. With over 1,000 African startups relying heavily on foreign AI models, concerns about digital dependency were raised, prompting African leaders to advocate for tailored solutions that reflect local realities.

The Call for Action

The session, hosted by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), gathered voices from various sectors, including government, civil society, and private enterprises. Moderated by a prominent figure in the field, the discussion highlighted the necessity for AI to support democratic governance in Africa. The emphasis was placed on the principles of fairness, transparency, and inclusion.

Warnings About AI’s Impact

Neema Iyer, the Executive Director of Policy, voiced concerns about how AI can undermine governance through surveillance, disinformation, and political manipulation. She called for civil society to act as both watchdogs and storytellers, advocating for public interest impact assessments and grassroots education to mitigate these risks.

Frameworks for Trustworthy AI

Representatives from various countries, including South Africa, stressed the importance of having transparent governance frameworks grounded in constitutional values. It was noted that policies must be inclusive, emphasizing the need for explainability, the removal of data biases, and citizen oversight as essential components of trustworthy AI.

Avoiding Digital Dependency

Lacina Koné, CEO of Smart Africa, urged immediate action to prevent digital dependency, stating, “We cannot be passively optimistic. Africa must be intentional.” He pointed out that the reliance on foreign AI models poses significant sovereignty risks and highlighted the need for Africa to focus on beneficial AI, particularly in sectors like agriculture, healthcare, and education.

Challenges and Experiences

Matchiane Soueid Ahmed from Mauritania shared insights into her country’s experience in developing a national AI strategy. Despite the challenges, including poor rural infrastructure and technical capacity gaps, she emphasized that sovereignty extends beyond territorial borders into the digital realm.

Private Sector Perspectives

Shikoh Gitau, CEO of KALA in Kenya, highlighted the role of the private sector in fostering AI literacy. Her organization runs campaigns across six countries, directly training teachers within their communities. Gitau emphasized the importance of creating enabling environments and engaging with blended financing to support these initiatives.

Harmonization and Youth Concerns

Audience members from countries such as Gambia, Ghana, and Liberia raised crucial questions about the harmonization of AI strategies and addressed youth fears regarding job loss and AI readiness. In response, Koné noted that Smart Africa is actively benchmarking national strategies and promoting convergence without erasing national sovereignty.

Implementation and Future Prospects

Despite 19 African countries having published AI strategies, the speakers acknowledged that implementation remains slow. They stressed the need for practical actions like infrastructure upgrades, talent development, and public-private collaboration to bring these frameworks to fruition.

Conclusion

The panel concluded that building AI systems prioritizing inclusion, utility, and human rights is essential. Investments in digital literacy, ethics boards, and regulatory sandboxes were identified as key tools for effective governance. The session wrapped up with a sense of cautious optimism, reinforcing the idea that while the journey toward ethical AI in Africa is ongoing, the right investments and partnerships can pave the way for a promising future.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...