Adapting to the EU AI Act: Essential Insights for Insurers

Preparing for the EU AI Act in Insurance

The EU Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) is ushering in a new era of accountability and transparency for organizations deploying AI systems, particularly in high-impact sectors like insurance. A key requirement under Article 27 of the Act is the Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA), which plays a crucial role in ensuring that AI deployment aligns with fundamental rights.

What Insurance Companies Need to Know About the FRIA

For insurers utilizing AI to streamline underwriting, set premiums, or assess risk, understanding and preparing for the FRIA is essential. This process is not merely a compliance exercise; it is vital for maintaining trust, ensuring fairness, and protecting customer rights.

Why Insurance Providers Must Pay Attention

The EU AI Act specifically identifies insurance as a high-risk sector. More precisely, Annex III, point 5(c) of the regulation applies to AI systems used for risk assessment and life and health insurance pricing. Insurers using AI models to calculate premiums, assess eligibility, or segment customer risk profiles must conduct a FRIA to evaluate potential biases and ensure responsible deployment.

What the FRIA Means for Your Organization

The FRIA necessitates a structured analysis of how AI systems impact individuals’ fundamental rights. For insurance companies, this entails examining whether automated decisions could lead to discrimination, unjust exclusions, or lack of transparency for specific customer groups. For instance, if a system uses health data or geographic information to adjust pricing, it is crucial to assess how these features might disproportionately affect individuals based on characteristics like age, disability, or socio-economic status.

Importantly, this assessment is not a task for one team alone; it requires coordinated input from:

  • Compliance and legal teams to interpret regulatory requirements and document alignment,
  • Risk and actuarial departments to evaluate potential harm and define risk thresholds,
  • Data scientists and IT teams to explain model logic and technical safeguards,
  • Customer experience and operations to provide insights into real-world use and customer impact,
  • Senior leadership to ensure strategic oversight and adequate resourcing.

Key Elements of the FRIA in an Insurance Context

Article 27 outlines six essential components that every FRIA must include, each with particular relevance to insurance companies:

  1. System usage: Clearly explain how AI is utilized, such as scoring individuals based on health risk factors or behavioral data to determine premiums.
  2. Usage timeline: Indicate when and how frequently the system operates. Does it assess risk at the point of application, continuously during the policy term, or only at renewal?
  3. Affected individuals: Identify customer segments that may be impacted, especially potentially vulnerable groups like individuals with chronic health conditions or older adults.
  4. Potential harms: Explore how the AI system might lead to biased outcomes, such as unjust premium increases or coverage denials.
  5. Human oversight: Detail how decisions are reviewed or overridden, particularly in borderline or sensitive cases. This may involve setting confidence thresholds or requiring human review of adverse decisions.
  6. Remediation measures: Explain procedures for addressing errors. Are there clear avenues for customers to contest decisions? How are corrections handled?

Compliance is Ongoing, Not One-Off

Completing a FRIA is not merely a box-checking exercise. Insurance providers must notify relevant supervisory authorities once the assessment is finalized and update it whenever changes occur in the AI system, data inputs, or risk models.

Moreover, organizations already conducting Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) under the GDPR can build their FRIA on this foundation. Article 27(4) encourages utilizing existing DPIAs as a baseline to avoid duplicating efforts.

Overcoming Industry-Specific Challenges

The insurance industry faces unique challenges while implementing the FRIA. There exists a tension between risk-based pricing and fairness, particularly where actuarial accuracy may inadvertently disadvantage certain groups. Internal silos between underwriting, compliance, and data science teams can further complicate this landscape.

To navigate these complexities, insurers should focus on building strong internal governance frameworks, investing in explainability tools, and fostering collaboration across departments. Partnering with AI governance experts and adopting purpose-built tools can significantly ease the burden of compliance.

Supporting Ethical and Compliant AI in Insurance

As AI continues to transform the insurance sector, the FRIA presents an opportunity to meet regulatory expectations and foster more transparent, fair, and accountable systems. It allows organizations to demonstrate that customer rights are protected, even when decisions are made rapidly through algorithms.

Preparing for the EU AI Act requires a proactive approach to ensure alignment with FRIA requirements and to safeguard the rights of customers in an increasingly automated world.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...

AI in Australian Government: Balancing Innovation and Security Risks

The Australian government is considering using AI to draft sensitive cabinet submissions as part of a broader strategy to implement AI across the public service. While some public servants report...