Understanding the EU’s New Definition of AI Systems

EU Commission Issues Guidelines on the Definition of AI Systems

The European Commission has issued long-awaited comprehensive guidelines on the definition of AI systems, as established by Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act). With these practical guidelines, the Commission aims to assist providers, deployers, importers, and distributors of AI systems in determining whether a system constitutes an AI system within the meaning of the AI Act, thereby facilitating the effective application and enforcement of that Act. The definition of AI systems entered into force on 2 February 2025.

Key Elements of the AI System Definition

Due to the diverse nature of AI systems, the guidelines cannot provide an exhaustive list. Each system is required to be assessed based on its specific characteristics.

The AI Act follows a lifecycle-based approach and defines an AI system as follows:

  1. Machine-based system
  2. Designed to operate with varying levels of autonomy
  3. May exhibit adaptiveness after deployment
  4. For explicit or implicit objectives
  5. Infers from the input it receives how to generate outputs
  6. Such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions
  7. That can influence physical or virtual environments

This seven-point definition covers two main phases: pre-deployment (building phase) and post-deployment (use phase). Not all seven elements must be present throughout both phases; some may appear only at one stage.

Concise Summary of Each of the Seven Points

1. Machine-based System

AI systems are machine-based, which means they are developed with and run on machines and rely on both hardware and software components to function. Hardware includes processing units, memory, storage devices, and networking interfaces, while software consists of computer code, operating systems, and applications that enable data processing and task execution.

2. Autonomy

The autonomy of an AI system refers to its ability to operate with varying levels of independence from human involvement. AI systems range from those operating with full human involvement and intervention (direct or manual control) or indirect (automated oversight) to fully autonomous ones, with many falling in between. A system that processes manually provided inputs to generate an output independently still qualifies as having some degree of independence of action.

The level of autonomy is crucial for providers when determining the risk of the AI system and compliance obligations and implementing safeguards for AI deployment.

3. Adaptiveness

Adaptiveness refers to an AI system’s ability to exhibit self-learning capabilities after deployment, allowing its behaviour to change over time and produce different results for the same inputs.

4. AI System Objectives

AI systems are designed to operate based on explicit or implicit objectives that guide their functionality. Explicit objectives are clearly defined goals directly encoded by developers, while implicit objectives emerge from the system’s behaviour, training data, or interactions with its environment.

An AI system’s objectives can differ from its intended purpose, which is how it is meant to be used in a specific context.

5. Inferencing How to Generate Outputs Using AI Techniques

A key characteristic of an AI system is its ability to infer how to generate outputs from the input it receives, distinguishing it from traditional rule-based software. The inference process enables AI systems to produce predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that influence physical and virtual environments.

There are two broad categories of inference techniques:

  1. Machine learning approaches that learn from data to achieve objectives, such as supervised learning, unsupervised learning, self-supervised learning, reinforcement learning, and deep learning.
  2. Logic- and knowledge-based approaches that infer from encoded knowledge or symbolic representations, applying rules, facts, and relationships encoded by human experts.

6. Outputs That Can Influence Physical or Virtual Environments

A key characteristic of AI systems is their ability to generate outputs that can influence physical or virtual environments. These outputs fall into four categories – predictions, content, recommendations, and decisions.

7. Interaction with the Environment

AI systems’ outputs actively impact physical and virtual environments, influencing tangible objects and digital spaces such as data flows and software ecosystems.

Systems Outside the Scope of the AI System Definition

The AI system definition does not cover systems that are based solely on rules defined by natural persons to automatically execute operations, including:

  1. Systems for improving mathematical optimisation that do not transcend basic data processing.
  2. Basic data processing systems that follow predefined, explicit instructions.
  3. Systems based on classical heuristics that rely on experience-based methods.
  4. Simple prediction systems whose performance can be achieved via basic statistical learning rules.

For advice navigating these regulations and ensuring your AI systems meet required standards, it is advisable to consult with experts in the field.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...