Understanding the EU’s New Definition of AI Systems

EU Commission Issues Guidelines on the Definition of AI Systems

The European Commission has issued long-awaited comprehensive guidelines on the definition of AI systems, as established by Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act). With these practical guidelines, the Commission aims to assist providers, deployers, importers, and distributors of AI systems in determining whether a system constitutes an AI system within the meaning of the AI Act, thereby facilitating the effective application and enforcement of that Act. The definition of AI systems entered into force on 2 February 2025.

Key Elements of the AI System Definition

Due to the diverse nature of AI systems, the guidelines cannot provide an exhaustive list. Each system is required to be assessed based on its specific characteristics.

The AI Act follows a lifecycle-based approach and defines an AI system as follows:

  1. Machine-based system
  2. Designed to operate with varying levels of autonomy
  3. May exhibit adaptiveness after deployment
  4. For explicit or implicit objectives
  5. Infers from the input it receives how to generate outputs
  6. Such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions
  7. That can influence physical or virtual environments

This seven-point definition covers two main phases: pre-deployment (building phase) and post-deployment (use phase). Not all seven elements must be present throughout both phases; some may appear only at one stage.

Concise Summary of Each of the Seven Points

1. Machine-based System

AI systems are machine-based, which means they are developed with and run on machines and rely on both hardware and software components to function. Hardware includes processing units, memory, storage devices, and networking interfaces, while software consists of computer code, operating systems, and applications that enable data processing and task execution.

2. Autonomy

The autonomy of an AI system refers to its ability to operate with varying levels of independence from human involvement. AI systems range from those operating with full human involvement and intervention (direct or manual control) or indirect (automated oversight) to fully autonomous ones, with many falling in between. A system that processes manually provided inputs to generate an output independently still qualifies as having some degree of independence of action.

The level of autonomy is crucial for providers when determining the risk of the AI system and compliance obligations and implementing safeguards for AI deployment.

3. Adaptiveness

Adaptiveness refers to an AI system’s ability to exhibit self-learning capabilities after deployment, allowing its behaviour to change over time and produce different results for the same inputs.

4. AI System Objectives

AI systems are designed to operate based on explicit or implicit objectives that guide their functionality. Explicit objectives are clearly defined goals directly encoded by developers, while implicit objectives emerge from the system’s behaviour, training data, or interactions with its environment.

An AI system’s objectives can differ from its intended purpose, which is how it is meant to be used in a specific context.

5. Inferencing How to Generate Outputs Using AI Techniques

A key characteristic of an AI system is its ability to infer how to generate outputs from the input it receives, distinguishing it from traditional rule-based software. The inference process enables AI systems to produce predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that influence physical and virtual environments.

There are two broad categories of inference techniques:

  1. Machine learning approaches that learn from data to achieve objectives, such as supervised learning, unsupervised learning, self-supervised learning, reinforcement learning, and deep learning.
  2. Logic- and knowledge-based approaches that infer from encoded knowledge or symbolic representations, applying rules, facts, and relationships encoded by human experts.

6. Outputs That Can Influence Physical or Virtual Environments

A key characteristic of AI systems is their ability to generate outputs that can influence physical or virtual environments. These outputs fall into four categories – predictions, content, recommendations, and decisions.

7. Interaction with the Environment

AI systems’ outputs actively impact physical and virtual environments, influencing tangible objects and digital spaces such as data flows and software ecosystems.

Systems Outside the Scope of the AI System Definition

The AI system definition does not cover systems that are based solely on rules defined by natural persons to automatically execute operations, including:

  1. Systems for improving mathematical optimisation that do not transcend basic data processing.
  2. Basic data processing systems that follow predefined, explicit instructions.
  3. Systems based on classical heuristics that rely on experience-based methods.
  4. Simple prediction systems whose performance can be achieved via basic statistical learning rules.

For advice navigating these regulations and ensuring your AI systems meet required standards, it is advisable to consult with experts in the field.

More Insights

Balancing Innovation and Ethics in AI Engineering

Artificial Intelligence has rapidly advanced, placing AI engineers at the forefront of innovation as they design and deploy intelligent systems. However, with this power comes the responsibility to...

Harnessing the Power of Responsible AI

Responsible AI is described by Dr. Anna Zeiter as a fundamental imperative rather than just a buzzword, emphasizing the need for ethical frameworks as AI reshapes the world. She highlights the...

Integrating AI: A Compliance-Driven Approach for Businesses

The Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) highlights that many AI adoption efforts fail because companies attempt to integrate AI into outdated processes that lack the necessary transparency and adaptability...

Preserving Generative AI Outputs: Legal Considerations and Best Practices

Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools raise legal concerns regarding data privacy, security, and the preservation of prompts and outputs for litigation. Organizations must develop information...

Embracing Responsible AI: Principles and Practices for a Fair Future

Responsible AI refers to the creation and use of artificial intelligence systems that are fair, transparent, and accountable. It emphasizes the importance of ethical considerations in AI development...

Building Trustworthy AI for Sustainable Business Growth

As businesses increasingly rely on artificial intelligence (AI) for critical decision-making, the importance of building trust and governance around these technologies becomes paramount. Organizations...

Spain’s Trailblazing AI Regulatory Framework

Spain is leading in AI governance by establishing Europe’s first AI regulator, AESIA, and implementing a draft national AI law that aligns with the EU AI Act. The country is also creating a regulatory...

Global AI Regulation: Trends and Challenges

This document discusses the current state of AI regulation in Israel, highlighting the absence of specific laws directly regulating AI. It also outlines the government's efforts to promote responsible...

AI and Regulatory Challenges in the Gambling Industry

The article discusses the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the gambling industry, emphasizing the balance between technological advancements and regulatory compliance. It highlights the...