Understanding the EU AI Act: Key Implications for Businesses

The European Union’s AI Act: Implications for Businesses

The European Union (EU) has recently enacted the AI Act, marking a significant step in the regulation of artificial intelligence (AI). This legislation aims to establish comprehensive guidelines for the development and deployment of AI technologies while safeguarding fundamental rights. As AI becomes increasingly integrated into various sectors, including printing and document imaging, understanding the implications of this act is crucial for businesses.

Categories of AI Risk

The AI Act categorizes AI systems into four distinct risk levels: unacceptable risk, high risk, limited risk, and minimal risk. For instance, applications like facial recognition used in public surveillance fall under the “unacceptable risk” category. In contrast, AI systems used in human resources, financial services, and legal compliance are classified as “high risk.”

This classification is particularly relevant for businesses that utilize automated document processing, identity verification, and data extraction, as these functions may be subject to stringent regulatory oversight depending on their risk assessment.

Transparency Requirements

One of the core tenets of the AI Act is the requirement for transparency. Users must be informed when they are interacting with AI, especially in scenarios that involve content generation, biometric data processing, or classification. For example, AI systems that auto-generate text or utilize optical character recognition (OCR) for identity verification must clearly disclose their AI involvement to users.

In practice, solutions that generate or manipulate documents must integrate user transparency into their design and documentation, ensuring that stakeholders are aware of the AI’s role in their operations.

Obligations for High-Risk AI Systems

Businesses deploying high-risk AI systems are mandated to implement rigorous governance practices. These include conducting risk assessments, maintaining comprehensive record-keeping, and registering AI systems in an EU-managed database. Non-compliance can lead to substantial fines, potentially reaching up to €35 million or 7% of global revenues.

If a company’s print and imaging solutions cater to regulated sectors, such as healthcare, finance, or public services, adherence to these requirements is essential. Achieving compliance will necessitate collaboration among technical, legal, and operational teams, which may also serve as a competitive advantage in bidding scenarios.

A Real-World Example

Consider a financial services provider that employs AI-enhanced OCR to process scanned contracts and compliance documents. This system uses natural language processing to identify key clauses and highlight potential compliance risks. Under the AI Act, this technology is categorized as high risk due to its involvement in critical financial decision-making. Users must be informed that AI is reviewing and interpreting their documents to comply with transparency rules.

Recent and Upcoming Developments

Here’s a brief overview of recent updates regarding the EU AI Act and what businesses can expect in the coming years:

  • In early February 2025, the first set of banned AI practices, including social scoring and manipulative AI, became enforceable.
  • In May 2025, the EU introduced a Code of Practice for general-purpose AI tools, providing guidance on transparency and risk.
  • On August 2, 2026, the primary requirements for high-risk AI systems will come into effect, encompassing documentation, oversight, and registration.

The EU is also prioritizing energy-efficient AI and raising concerns regarding the use of copyrighted content, signaling a broader commitment to responsible AI practices across industries.

The Bottom Line

The EU AI Act represents not merely a legal obligation but a strategic directive for industries, particularly in printing and document imaging. It emphasizes the necessity of responsible AI design in areas such as automation, content recognition, and digital transformation. Businesses should proactively align with these standards to enhance customer trust, mitigate legal risks, and maintain a competitive edge in a rapidly evolving market.

Now is the time for organizations to assess their AI capabilities, engage cross-functional teams, and begin developing an AI roadmap that is both innovative and compliant.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...