Understanding the EU AI Act: Key Compliance Insights

Understanding the EU AI Act

The EU AI Act (European Union Artificial Intelligence Act) is the world’s first comprehensive legal framework regulating artificial intelligence. Introduced by the European Commission in April 2021 and formally adopted in 2024, the Act aims to ensure that AI systems developed or used in the EU are safe, transparent, ethical, and respect fundamental rights. This legislation is particularly relevant to organizations that develop, deploy, or distribute AI systems across various sectors, including healthcare, finance, manufacturing, education, law enforcement, and public services.

The regulation applies not only to EU-based companies but also to any organization globally that provides AI systems or services within the EU market. It aligns with existing European data protection laws like the GDPR and is part of the broader EU digital strategy.

Risk Classification of AI Systems

The EU AI Act classifies AI systems into four risk categories:

  • Unacceptable
  • High
  • Limited
  • Minimal

Obligations scale according to the associated risk. High-risk AI systems, such as those used in biometric identification, critical infrastructure, employment, and law enforcement, are subject to strict compliance requirements.

Key Requirements for Compliance

To comply with the EU AI Act, organizations must:

  • Determine the AI risk classification of their systems.
  • Conduct conformity assessments for high-risk AI systems before market entry.
  • Implement a quality management system (QMS) for AI lifecycle governance.
  • Ensure data governance and documentation, including data training, validation, and bias mitigation.
  • Establish human oversight mechanisms to ensure AI does not operate autonomously in high-risk scenarios.
  • Maintain transparency by informing users when they are interacting with AI (e.g., chatbots, deepfakes).
  • Register high-risk AI systems in the EU database managed by the European Commission.

Compliance steps often require coordination with multiple functions, including legal, compliance, data science, and product development teams. The Act is designed to be technology-neutral but often references complementary standards such as ISO/IEC 42001 (AI Management Systems) and ISO/IEC 23894 (AI Risk Management).

The authoritative body overseeing enforcement is the European Artificial Intelligence Office, working in coordination with national supervisory authorities across EU member states.

Benefits of Compliance

Complying with the EU AI Act isn’t just about avoiding penalties; it’s a competitive advantage. Key benefits include:

  • Market access to the EU’s 450+ million consumers.
  • Improved trust and brand reputation among users, investors, and partners.
  • Enhanced governance and ethical AI development, leading to better long-term product sustainability.
  • Alignment with global trends in AI regulation, preparing your organization for other regional laws.

Non-compliance, especially for high-risk systems, carries serious consequences:

  • Fines of up to €35 million or 7% of global annual turnover, whichever is higher.
  • Product bans or mandatory recalls within the EU market.
  • Reputational damage, reduced customer trust, and competitive disadvantage.

Early compliance allows organizations to mitigate legal risks, drive innovation responsibly, and future-proof their operations in an evolving regulatory landscape.

Steps to Achieve Compliance

The Centraleyes risk and compliance platform is designed to guide organizations through EU AI Act compliance from start to finish. The platform helps users identify their AI system’s risk category, complete the required assessments, and collect structured evidence through an intuitive, step-by-step process. It includes built-in support for technical documentation, a remediation center to manage gaps, analytics to track progress, and tools to generate declarations and prepare for registration.

Assessment Categories

To determine which EU AI Act assessment applies to your organization, consider the following categories:

1. High-Risk AI Systems

Choose this if your system is used in sensitive or regulated areas, like hiring, education, public services, or anything involving biometric identification. Examples include:

  • CV screening tools
  • Automated grading systems
  • Border control technologies
  • Systems that affect access to jobs, loans, or housing

Requirements include filling out the high-risk compliance questionnaire, preparing technical documentation, signing a Declaration of Conformity, and registering your system with the EU.

2. Limited-Risk AI Systems

Choose this if your system interacts with people (like a chatbot or AI assistant), detects emotions or physical traits, or generates synthetic content. Requirements include answering the limited-risk assessment about transparency and ensuring users know they’re interacting with AI.

3. Minimal-Risk AI Systems

Choose this if your system doesn’t fit into the first two groups. These are everyday tools with low impact, like internal productivity software. While nothing is required by law, completing the Minimal Risk – Voluntary Best Practices Checklist Assessment is suggested.

For organizations unsure of which category their system falls into or needing assistance with the compliance process, support is available to guide them through the necessary steps.

More Insights

Transforming Corporate Governance: The Impact of the EU AI Act

This research project investigates how the EU Artificial Intelligence Act is transforming corporate governance and accountability frameworks, compelling companies to reconfigure responsibilities and...

AI-Driven Cybersecurity: Bridging the Accountability Gap

As organizations increasingly adopt AI to drive innovation, they face a dual challenge: while AI enhances cybersecurity measures, it simultaneously facilitates more sophisticated cyberattacks. The...

Thailand’s Comprehensive AI Governance Strategy

Thailand is drafting principles for artificial intelligence (AI) legislation aimed at establishing an AI ecosystem and enhancing user protection from potential risks. The legislation will remove legal...

Texas Implements Groundbreaking AI Regulations in Healthcare

Texas has enacted comprehensive AI governance laws, including the Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA) and Senate Bill 1188, which establish a framework for responsible AI...

AI Governance: Balancing Innovation and Oversight

Riskonnect has launched its new AI Governance solution, enabling organizations to manage the risks and compliance obligations of AI technologies while fostering innovation. The solution integrates...

AI Alignment: Ensuring Technology Serves Human Values

Gillian K. Hadfield has been appointed as the Bloomberg Distinguished Professor of AI Alignment and Governance at Johns Hopkins University, where she will focus on ensuring that artificial...

The Ethical Dilemma of Face Swap Technology

As AI technology evolves, face swap tools are increasingly misused for creating non-consensual explicit content, leading to significant ethical, emotional, and legal consequences. This article...

The Illusion of Influence: The EU AI Act’s Global Reach

The EU AI Act, while aiming to set a regulatory framework for artificial intelligence, faces challenges in influencing other countries due to differing legal and cultural values. This has led to the...

The Illusion of Influence: The EU AI Act’s Global Reach

The EU AI Act, while aiming to set a regulatory framework for artificial intelligence, faces challenges in influencing other countries due to differing legal and cultural values. This has led to the...