Understanding the EU AI Act: Defining General-Purpose AI Models

Understanding the EU AI Act: Defining General-Purpose AI Models

The EU AI Act introduces a framework for regulating artificial intelligence, specifically focusing on the categorization of AI models. A key aspect of this legislation is the definition of a General-Purpose AI model (GPAI model). Any entity or individual placing an AI model on the EU Market must determine if it qualifies as a GPAI model, which is essential for compliance with the Act.

Definition of General-Purpose AI Model

The Act defines a GPAI model as follows: “General-purpose AI model means an AI model, including where such an AI model is trained with a large amount of data using self-supervision at scale, that displays significant generality and is capable of competently performing a wide range of distinct tasks regardless of the way the model is placed on the market and that can be integrated into a variety of downstream systems or applications, except AI models that are used for research, development or prototyping activities before they are placed on the market.”

This definition encompasses several critical requirements:

  1. Existence of an AI model
  2. Significant generality
  3. Capability to perform a wide range of distinct tasks
  4. Capability to be integrated into downstream systems or applications

Components of an AI Model

The initial component of the GPAI model definition is the existence of an AI model. While the Act does not provide a specific definition, two recognized institutions have contributed to the understanding:

  • The International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) defines an AI model as “a physical, mathematical or otherwise logical representation of a system, entity, phenomenon, process or data.”
  • The National Institute of Standards and Technology describes an AI model as “a component of an information system that implements AI technology and uses computational, statistical, or machine-learning techniques to produce outputs from a given set of inputs.”

These definitions imply that an AI model acts as a component of a larger AI system and is typically trained on vast datasets, integrating various AI techniques. However, it cannot function independently without additional components, such as a user interface.

Significant Generality

To qualify as a GPAI model, the AI model must demonstrate significant generality. Recital 98 of the AI Act suggests that models with “at least a billion parameters and trained with a large amount of data using self-supervision at scale” exhibit significant generality. Key factors include:

  • Number of parameters
  • Amount of training data

The EU Commission has introduced a simplified metric known as training compute, measured in floating-point operations (FLOPs), to assess significant generality. A model must perform at least 1023 FLOPs to be considered a GPAI model.

This threshold simplifies the evaluation process by consolidating the assessment into one metric instead of two. However, providers might face challenges in estimating the actual training compute, which can be approximated by tracking GPU usage or estimating based on the model’s architecture.

Performing a Wide Range of Distinct Tasks

An essential criterion for an AI model to be categorized as a GPAI model is its ability to competently perform a wide range of distinct tasks. Language generation is particularly relevant here, as models capable of generating text or speech are generally seen as advanced and versatile.

For example, models that can analyze text, reason, and solve complex problems are indicative of a GPAI model, even if they do not meet the specified training compute threshold. Moreover, models that generate various content types may also qualify as GPAI models if they possess multiple features and flexibility in content generation.

Integration into Downstream Systems or Applications

It is crucial to note that a GPAI model, when standalone, does not constitute a complete AI system. It requires integration with additional components, such as user interfaces, to function effectively within an AI system. Providers must comply with the EU AI Act regulations applicable to both the GPAI model and the overall AI system.

Conclusion

In summary, a General-Purpose AI model is defined by its training on large datasets, its capacity for complex computation, and its ability to provide outputs across various applications. The criteria for classification can be distilled into three main aspects: complexity, size, and versatility. It’s important to recognize that a standalone AI model does not equate to an AI system without further integration.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...