Understanding Compliance for Risky AI Systems in the Workplace

Risky AI Systems: An Overview

The emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has brought about significant advancements, but it also poses substantial risks. Understanding these risks is crucial for businesses and employers who utilize AI systems. This article delves into the implications of the EU AI Act, a groundbreaking piece of legislation that regulates AI based on its risk levels.

The EU AI Act: A World First

On February 2, 2025, the EU AI Act came into effect, marking the first legislative effort globally to regulate AI systems. The Act categorizes AI uses into various risk levels—from minimal risk to unacceptable risk. This classification aims to enhance safety, transparency, and sustainability while preventing discriminatory practices in AI applications.

Organizations need to be proactive in ensuring compliance to avoid potential fines and reputational damage.

Scope of the Act: Who Needs to Comply?

The Act applies not only to AI suppliers within the EU but also to providers and users located outside the EU if their AI outputs are utilized within the EU. For instance, using an AI recruitment tool in the UK for hiring within the EU falls under the Act’s jurisdiction.

Risk Categories Defined

AI uses are classified into different risk categories:

  • Minimal Risk: Most AI systems currently available in the EU market.
  • Limited Risk: Subject to light-touch obligations.
  • High Risk: Stricter regulations are imposed.
  • Unacceptable Risk: Banned outright due to significant threats to users and society.

The maximum penalty for non-compliance can reach €35 million or up to 7% of a firm’s total annual turnover.

High Risk AI Systems

High-risk AI systems include applications that affect fundamental rights, such as:

  • Biometric data categorization (e.g., AI in CCTV).
  • Education and training tools (e.g., detecting erratic student behavior).
  • Employment-related AI (e.g., HR decision-making and recruitment).
  • Justice administration (e.g., AI in alternative dispute resolution).

These systems must demonstrate a significant risk of harm to health, safety, or fundamental rights to qualify as high risk.

Unacceptable Risk AI Systems

As of February 2, 2025, certain AI systems have been categorized as unacceptable risk and are thus prohibited. Examples include:

  • Systems that socially score individuals.
  • Emotion recognition technologies in workplaces and schools.
  • Biometric categorization systems that infer sensitive attributes.

Action Steps for Employers

Employers must take immediate steps if their business falls within the Act’s scope:

  • Audits: Evaluate current AI systems for compliance with risk categories.
  • Policies: Establish governance policies to guide responsible AI usage.
  • Training: Educate employees about AI risks and responsibilities.
  • Supplier Compliance: Ensure third-party AI providers adhere to the Act.

Proactive compliance with the Act will help maintain a culture focused on people, mitigate substantial fines, and protect the organization’s reputation.

More Insights

Balancing Innovation and Ethics in AI Engineering

Artificial Intelligence has rapidly advanced, placing AI engineers at the forefront of innovation as they design and deploy intelligent systems. However, with this power comes the responsibility to...

Harnessing the Power of Responsible AI

Responsible AI is described by Dr. Anna Zeiter as a fundamental imperative rather than just a buzzword, emphasizing the need for ethical frameworks as AI reshapes the world. She highlights the...

Integrating AI: A Compliance-Driven Approach for Businesses

The Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) highlights that many AI adoption efforts fail because companies attempt to integrate AI into outdated processes that lack the necessary transparency and adaptability...

Preserving Generative AI Outputs: Legal Considerations and Best Practices

Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools raise legal concerns regarding data privacy, security, and the preservation of prompts and outputs for litigation. Organizations must develop information...

Embracing Responsible AI: Principles and Practices for a Fair Future

Responsible AI refers to the creation and use of artificial intelligence systems that are fair, transparent, and accountable. It emphasizes the importance of ethical considerations in AI development...

Building Trustworthy AI for Sustainable Business Growth

As businesses increasingly rely on artificial intelligence (AI) for critical decision-making, the importance of building trust and governance around these technologies becomes paramount. Organizations...

Spain’s Trailblazing AI Regulatory Framework

Spain is leading in AI governance by establishing Europe’s first AI regulator, AESIA, and implementing a draft national AI law that aligns with the EU AI Act. The country is also creating a regulatory...

Global AI Regulation: Trends and Challenges

This document discusses the current state of AI regulation in Israel, highlighting the absence of specific laws directly regulating AI. It also outlines the government's efforts to promote responsible...

AI and Regulatory Challenges in the Gambling Industry

The article discusses the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the gambling industry, emphasizing the balance between technological advancements and regulatory compliance. It highlights the...