Trump Administration Ditches Biden’s AI Export Rules

Trump Administration Rescinds Biden’s AI Diffusion Rules

On June 11, 2025, the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC) officially rescinded the Biden administration’s Artificial Intelligence Diffusion Rule, just days before it was set to be implemented. This decision marks a significant shift in the U.S. government’s approach to regulating the export of AI technology.

Background of the AI Diffusion Rule

The Artificial Intelligence Diffusion Rule was introduced by former President Joe Biden in January 2025. It aimed to establish limits on the export of U.S.-made AI chips to various countries, enhancing existing restrictions for the first time. The rule categorized countries into three tiers:

  • Tier 1: Countries like Japan and South Korea, which would face no export restrictions.
  • Tier 2: Regions including Mexico and Portugal, which would see chip export limits for the first time.
  • Tier 3: Countries such as China and Russia, which would encounter tightened controls.

Announcement of Rescission

On a Tuesday in early June, the DOC announced that it would not enforce the Biden-era regulation, signaling a new direction under the Trump administration. The Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security, Jeffrey Kessler, stated, “The Trump Administration will pursue a bold, inclusive strategy to American AI technology with trusted foreign countries around the world, while keeping the technology out of the hands of our adversaries.”

Future of AI Regulations

The DOC indicated plans to introduce a replacement rule in the future, suggesting a shift towards direct negotiations with countries rather than implementing blanket restrictions. This change reflects a more flexible approach to international relations regarding AI technology.

Industry Guidance

In lieu of new regulations, the DOC provided guidance for the industry, emphasizing the importance of compliance with existing U.S. export rules. Companies were reminded that using Huawei’s Ascend AI chips anywhere in the world violates these rules. The guidance also warned against the potential consequences of allowing U.S. AI chips to be utilized for training AI models in China and recommended strategies to protect chip supply chains from diversion tactics.

Conclusion

The rescinding of the Artificial Intelligence Diffusion Rule illustrates the ongoing debate over how best to regulate emerging technologies like AI. As the Trump administration prepares to unveil new policies, the tech industry awaits clarity on how these changes will impact the future of AI development and international cooperation.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...