Texas Implements Groundbreaking AI Governance Law

Texas Enacts Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act

The Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA), signed into law recently, introduces a comprehensive regulatory framework governing the use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in the state. Set to take effect on January 1, 2026, this legislation aims to impose new requirements on both companies and government entities that utilize AI systems across various sectors.

Key Takeaways

  • TRAIGA introduces regulations on AI usage, focusing on compliance for companies and government entities.
  • Provisions include prohibitions on certain AI applications, mandatory disclosures in healthcare, and the establishment of an AI regulatory “sandbox”.
  • The act creates new exemptions to Texas’ existing biometrics law for specific AI scenarios.
  • Non-compliance with TRAIGA could result in significant financial penalties, urging covered entities to prepare for compliance.

Overview

TRAIGA aims to address the complexities associated with AI technologies, particularly surrounding biometrics, healthcare, and behavioral manipulation. The law’s introduction reflects the growing recognition of the need for responsible governance of AI systems, especially in light of recent legislative trends across various states.

Key Provisions

  • Narrowing Scope of Texas Biometrics Law: TRAIGA introduces significant carve-outs to Texas’ Capture or Use of Biometric Identifier law (CUBI). Most notably, it exempts AI systems that are not intended to uniquely identify individuals and those aimed at preventing illegal activities.
  • Prohibiting Certain AI Uses: The act prohibits the development of AI systems intended to:

    • Manipulate human behavior to incite self-harm, harm to others, or criminal activity.
    • Discriminate against protected classes in violation of civil rights.
    • Produce or distribute visual child sexual abuse material or certain sexually explicit content.
    • Infringe upon individual rights guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution.
  • Disclosure Requirements in Healthcare: TRAIGA mandates that healthcare providers clearly disclose any use of AI systems in treatment scenarios, ensuring transparency for patients.
  • Regulating Governmental Use of AI: The law enforces numerous requirements for governmental entities, including:

    • Disclosure when consumers interact with AI systems.
    • Prohibiting social scoring and uniquely identifying individuals without consent.
  • Regulatory Development Sandbox: TRAIGA establishes a framework allowing companies to test innovative AI systems under specific conditions, protecting them from certain legal repercussions during this trial phase.

Enforcement Authority

TRAIGA does not provide a private right of action, delegating exclusive enforcement authority to the Texas Attorney General (AG). The law outlines civil penalties ranging from $10,000 to $200,000 per violation, depending on the nature and circumstances of the infraction. Violations may also incur daily penalties for continued non-compliance.

How to Prepare

In the time leading up to TRAIGA’s implementation, it is crucial for organizations to assess their AI systems for compliance. As the Texas AG intensifies its focus on privacy and litigation, understanding and adhering to TRAIGA’s requirements will be essential for companies operating within the state.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...