Strengthening AI Governance in Higher Education

Improving AI Governance for Stronger University Compliance and Innovation

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more integrated into higher education, universities must adopt robust governance practices to ensure AI is used responsibly. AI can generate valuable insights for higher education institutions and enhance the teaching process itself. However, this can only be achieved when universities implement a strategic and proactive set of data and process management policies for their use of AI.

Unique Data Challenges in Higher Education

Higher education faces unique data challenges stemming from both regulatory requirements and the operational structure of universities. On the regulatory side, institutions must comply with a variety of frameworks, including:

  • Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) for student data privacy
  • Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) for medical schools
  • Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) for financial transactions

Additionally, regional regulations, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) for data protection, may also apply. Federal requirements related to accepting government funding for research further complicate compliance efforts.

Academic institutions may have multiple layers of internal policies to address these regulatory requirements, often involving faculty-senate or board-level buy-in. This creates a complex environment in which universities can struggle to balance strict regulatory compliance with their own data management practices.

Against this backdrop, data governance is not only about security; it also encompasses data quality, management practices, and clearly defined roles and responsibilities. This expansive view of governance is needed to match AI’s broad reach into virtually every aspect of university operations.

Key Priorities for AI Governance

To improve data governance and AI utilization in higher education, institutions should focus on several key priorities:

  • Data Privacy: Ensuring that AI systems operate effectively without inserting sensitive student data into models. Techniques such as retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and graph-based AI approaches allow institutions to utilize AI-driven insights while maintaining strict privacy controls.
  • Privacy-Preserving AI Techniques: Approaches like federated learning enable AI models to be trained on decentralized data without exposing sensitive information. Synthetic data generation is another valuable method that allows institutions to create lifelike datasets to support AI research and development while safeguarding real student data.
  • Accountability: Treating AI as an actor in governance policies ensures transparency in decision-making, reinforcing ethical AI adoption across all academic processes. For instance, AI can analyze application packages, assisting with decision-making by identifying patterns in successful applications. AI-driven chatbots can also support applicants throughout the admissions process by answering questions and guiding them through submission requirements.

Strong AI Governance Drives Innovation Across the University

Transformation teams in higher education recognize that the above priorities and techniques in managing AI must be supported by the right modernization steps at the systems and infrastructure level. Platforms must be designed to break traditional data silos, providing flexibility in integrating AI solutions across various academic departments and ensuring that governance frameworks are consistently applied throughout.

More Insights

G7 Summit Fails to Address Urgent AI Governance Needs

At the recent G7 summit in Canada, discussions primarily focused on economic opportunities related to AI, while governance issues for AI systems were notably overlooked. This shift towards...

Africa’s Bold Move Towards Sovereign AI Governance

At the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) 2025 in Oslo, African leaders called for urgent action to develop sovereign and ethical AI systems tailored to local needs, emphasizing the necessity for...

Top 10 Compliance Challenges in AI Regulations

As AI technology advances, the challenge of establishing effective regulations becomes increasingly complex, with different countries adopting varying approaches. This regulatory divergence poses...

China’s Unique Approach to Embodied AI

China's approach to artificial intelligence emphasizes the development of "embodied AI," which interacts with the physical environment, leveraging the country's strengths in manufacturing and...

Workday Sets New Standards in Responsible AI Governance

Workday has recently received dual third-party accreditations for its AI Governance Program, highlighting its commitment to responsible and transparent AI. Dr. Kelly Trindle, Chief Responsible AI...

AI Adoption in UK Finance: Balancing Innovation and Compliance

A recent survey by Smarsh reveals that while UK finance workers are increasingly adopting AI tools, there are significant concerns regarding compliance and oversight. Many employees express a desire...

AI Ethics Amid US-China Tensions: A Call for Global Standards

As the US-China tech rivalry intensifies, a UN agency is advocating for global AI ethics standards, highlighted during UNESCO's Global Forum on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Bangkok...

Mastering Compliance with the EU AI Act Through Advanced DSPM Solutions

The EU AI Act emphasizes the importance of compliance for organizations deploying AI technologies, with Zscaler’s Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) playing a crucial role in ensuring data...

US Lawmakers Push to Ban Adversarial AI Amid National Security Concerns

A bipartisan group of U.S. lawmakers has introduced the "No Adversarial AI Act," aiming to ban the use of artificial intelligence tools from countries like China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea in...