Strengthening AI Governance in Higher Education

Improving AI Governance for Stronger University Compliance and Innovation

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more integrated into higher education, universities must adopt robust governance practices to ensure AI is used responsibly. AI can generate valuable insights for higher education institutions and enhance the teaching process itself. However, this can only be achieved when universities implement a strategic and proactive set of data and process management policies for their use of AI.

Unique Data Challenges in Higher Education

Higher education faces unique data challenges stemming from both regulatory requirements and the operational structure of universities. On the regulatory side, institutions must comply with a variety of frameworks, including:

  • Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) for student data privacy
  • Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) for medical schools
  • Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) for financial transactions

Additionally, regional regulations, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) for data protection, may also apply. Federal requirements related to accepting government funding for research further complicate compliance efforts.

Academic institutions may have multiple layers of internal policies to address these regulatory requirements, often involving faculty-senate or board-level buy-in. This creates a complex environment in which universities can struggle to balance strict regulatory compliance with their own data management practices.

Against this backdrop, data governance is not only about security; it also encompasses data quality, management practices, and clearly defined roles and responsibilities. This expansive view of governance is needed to match AI’s broad reach into virtually every aspect of university operations.

Key Priorities for AI Governance

To improve data governance and AI utilization in higher education, institutions should focus on several key priorities:

  • Data Privacy: Ensuring that AI systems operate effectively without inserting sensitive student data into models. Techniques such as retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and graph-based AI approaches allow institutions to utilize AI-driven insights while maintaining strict privacy controls.
  • Privacy-Preserving AI Techniques: Approaches like federated learning enable AI models to be trained on decentralized data without exposing sensitive information. Synthetic data generation is another valuable method that allows institutions to create lifelike datasets to support AI research and development while safeguarding real student data.
  • Accountability: Treating AI as an actor in governance policies ensures transparency in decision-making, reinforcing ethical AI adoption across all academic processes. For instance, AI can analyze application packages, assisting with decision-making by identifying patterns in successful applications. AI-driven chatbots can also support applicants throughout the admissions process by answering questions and guiding them through submission requirements.

Strong AI Governance Drives Innovation Across the University

Transformation teams in higher education recognize that the above priorities and techniques in managing AI must be supported by the right modernization steps at the systems and infrastructure level. Platforms must be designed to break traditional data silos, providing flexibility in integrating AI solutions across various academic departments and ensuring that governance frameworks are consistently applied throughout.

More Insights

Transforming Corporate Governance: The Impact of the EU AI Act

This research project investigates how the EU Artificial Intelligence Act is transforming corporate governance and accountability frameworks, compelling companies to reconfigure responsibilities and...

AI-Driven Cybersecurity: Bridging the Accountability Gap

As organizations increasingly adopt AI to drive innovation, they face a dual challenge: while AI enhances cybersecurity measures, it simultaneously facilitates more sophisticated cyberattacks. The...

Thailand’s Comprehensive AI Governance Strategy

Thailand is drafting principles for artificial intelligence (AI) legislation aimed at establishing an AI ecosystem and enhancing user protection from potential risks. The legislation will remove legal...

Texas Implements Groundbreaking AI Regulations in Healthcare

Texas has enacted comprehensive AI governance laws, including the Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA) and Senate Bill 1188, which establish a framework for responsible AI...

AI Governance: Balancing Innovation and Oversight

Riskonnect has launched its new AI Governance solution, enabling organizations to manage the risks and compliance obligations of AI technologies while fostering innovation. The solution integrates...

AI Alignment: Ensuring Technology Serves Human Values

Gillian K. Hadfield has been appointed as the Bloomberg Distinguished Professor of AI Alignment and Governance at Johns Hopkins University, where she will focus on ensuring that artificial...

The Ethical Dilemma of Face Swap Technology

As AI technology evolves, face swap tools are increasingly misused for creating non-consensual explicit content, leading to significant ethical, emotional, and legal consequences. This article...

The Illusion of Influence: The EU AI Act’s Global Reach

The EU AI Act, while aiming to set a regulatory framework for artificial intelligence, faces challenges in influencing other countries due to differing legal and cultural values. This has led to the...

The Illusion of Influence: The EU AI Act’s Global Reach

The EU AI Act, while aiming to set a regulatory framework for artificial intelligence, faces challenges in influencing other countries due to differing legal and cultural values. This has led to the...