Strengthening AI Governance in Higher Education

Improving AI Governance for Stronger University Compliance and Innovation

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more integrated into higher education, universities must adopt robust governance practices to ensure AI is used responsibly. AI can generate valuable insights for higher education institutions and enhance the teaching process itself. However, this can only be achieved when universities implement a strategic and proactive set of data and process management policies for their use of AI.

Unique Data Challenges in Higher Education

Higher education faces unique data challenges stemming from both regulatory requirements and the operational structure of universities. On the regulatory side, institutions must comply with a variety of frameworks, including:

  • Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) for student data privacy
  • Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) for medical schools
  • Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) for financial transactions

Additionally, regional regulations, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) for data protection, may also apply. Federal requirements related to accepting government funding for research further complicate compliance efforts.

Academic institutions may have multiple layers of internal policies to address these regulatory requirements, often involving faculty-senate or board-level buy-in. This creates a complex environment in which universities can struggle to balance strict regulatory compliance with their own data management practices.

Against this backdrop, data governance is not only about security; it also encompasses data quality, management practices, and clearly defined roles and responsibilities. This expansive view of governance is needed to match AI’s broad reach into virtually every aspect of university operations.

Key Priorities for AI Governance

To improve data governance and AI utilization in higher education, institutions should focus on several key priorities:

  • Data Privacy: Ensuring that AI systems operate effectively without inserting sensitive student data into models. Techniques such as retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and graph-based AI approaches allow institutions to utilize AI-driven insights while maintaining strict privacy controls.
  • Privacy-Preserving AI Techniques: Approaches like federated learning enable AI models to be trained on decentralized data without exposing sensitive information. Synthetic data generation is another valuable method that allows institutions to create lifelike datasets to support AI research and development while safeguarding real student data.
  • Accountability: Treating AI as an actor in governance policies ensures transparency in decision-making, reinforcing ethical AI adoption across all academic processes. For instance, AI can analyze application packages, assisting with decision-making by identifying patterns in successful applications. AI-driven chatbots can also support applicants throughout the admissions process by answering questions and guiding them through submission requirements.

Strong AI Governance Drives Innovation Across the University

Transformation teams in higher education recognize that the above priorities and techniques in managing AI must be supported by the right modernization steps at the systems and infrastructure level. Platforms must be designed to break traditional data silos, providing flexibility in integrating AI solutions across various academic departments and ensuring that governance frameworks are consistently applied throughout.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...