Standardization Strategies for Compliance with the EU AI Act

Standardization for Compliance in the European Union’s AI Act

The European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) aims to establish a comprehensive framework for the regulation of AI technologies. A crucial element of this framework is the role of standardization, which is expected to provide technical solutions to ensure compliance with the Act’s complex requirements.

The Importance of Standardization

Standardization is seen as a key mechanism for achieving compliance with the AI Act. As various stakeholders engage in the development of relevant standards, the challenge remains significant: standards must be ready for implementation by August 2026, coinciding with the majority of the AI Act’s provisions coming into effect. The European Committee for Standardization and the European Electrotechnical Committee for Standardization are tasked with making these standards available by the end of 2025.

Standards and Specifications

Within the AI Act, several types of standards are defined:

  • Harmonized Standards: AI systems classified as high-risk and complying with harmonized standards published in the Official Journal of the EU will be presumed to meet the requirements outlined in the AI Act. These standards also encompass the general transparency requirements under Article 50 of the Act.
  • Common Specifications: The Commission has the authority to adopt common specifications for high-risk and limited-risk requirements. However, harmonized standards take precedence, and common specifications can only be adopted if no suitable standards exist.

Certificates and Compliance Assessments

Providers of high-risk AI systems must ensure their products undergo a conformity assessment procedure before entering the European market. This procedure varies based on the system’s type, and it can involve either internal control or an external review by a Notified Body (NB).

Upon successful assessment, an NB will issue an EU technical documentation assessment certificate, which is crucial for demonstrating compliance with the AI Act. These systems must also bear the CE marking to signify their conformity.

Role of Notifying Authorities and Notified Bodies

The AI Act mandates EU Member States to designate at least one Notifying Authority (NA) responsible for overseeing the assessment and notification of conformity assessment bodies (CABs). NAs must ensure that CABs can conduct independent and objective evaluations of high-risk AI systems.

Notified Bodies play a vital role in this ecosystem, verifying the conformity of AI systems according to the established assessment procedures. They must meet rigorous requirements to ensure impartiality and confidentiality in their assessments.

Conclusion

As the EU moves forward with the implementation of the AI Act, the development of standards and specifications will be crucial in meeting regulatory requirements. Stakeholders must engage in collaborative efforts to ensure that these standards are not only developed but also effectively integrated into the compliance frameworks of AI technologies.

This comprehensive approach aims to foster innovation while safeguarding public interests, thus balancing the advancement of AI technologies with necessary regulatory oversight.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...