Standardization Strategies for Compliance with the EU AI Act

Standardization for Compliance in the European Union’s AI Act

The European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) aims to establish a comprehensive framework for the regulation of AI technologies. A crucial element of this framework is the role of standardization, which is expected to provide technical solutions to ensure compliance with the Act’s complex requirements.

The Importance of Standardization

Standardization is seen as a key mechanism for achieving compliance with the AI Act. As various stakeholders engage in the development of relevant standards, the challenge remains significant: standards must be ready for implementation by August 2026, coinciding with the majority of the AI Act’s provisions coming into effect. The European Committee for Standardization and the European Electrotechnical Committee for Standardization are tasked with making these standards available by the end of 2025.

Standards and Specifications

Within the AI Act, several types of standards are defined:

  • Harmonized Standards: AI systems classified as high-risk and complying with harmonized standards published in the Official Journal of the EU will be presumed to meet the requirements outlined in the AI Act. These standards also encompass the general transparency requirements under Article 50 of the Act.
  • Common Specifications: The Commission has the authority to adopt common specifications for high-risk and limited-risk requirements. However, harmonized standards take precedence, and common specifications can only be adopted if no suitable standards exist.

Certificates and Compliance Assessments

Providers of high-risk AI systems must ensure their products undergo a conformity assessment procedure before entering the European market. This procedure varies based on the system’s type, and it can involve either internal control or an external review by a Notified Body (NB).

Upon successful assessment, an NB will issue an EU technical documentation assessment certificate, which is crucial for demonstrating compliance with the AI Act. These systems must also bear the CE marking to signify their conformity.

Role of Notifying Authorities and Notified Bodies

The AI Act mandates EU Member States to designate at least one Notifying Authority (NA) responsible for overseeing the assessment and notification of conformity assessment bodies (CABs). NAs must ensure that CABs can conduct independent and objective evaluations of high-risk AI systems.

Notified Bodies play a vital role in this ecosystem, verifying the conformity of AI systems according to the established assessment procedures. They must meet rigorous requirements to ensure impartiality and confidentiality in their assessments.

Conclusion

As the EU moves forward with the implementation of the AI Act, the development of standards and specifications will be crucial in meeting regulatory requirements. Stakeholders must engage in collaborative efforts to ensure that these standards are not only developed but also effectively integrated into the compliance frameworks of AI technologies.

This comprehensive approach aims to foster innovation while safeguarding public interests, thus balancing the advancement of AI technologies with necessary regulatory oversight.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...