Spain’s Bold Move: Stricter Regulations on AI and Deepfakes

Spain Approves AI Bill With Heavy Fines for Unlabeled Deepfakes

Spain has become one of the first member countries of the European Union to implement its AI Act, approving a new AI bill that outlines significant penalties for unlabeled AI-generated content, particularly deepfakes.

The bill, which addresses various malicious AI practices, specifies that the failure to properly label any AI-generated or manipulated content that depicts real or nonexistent individuals is considered a serious infringement. According to Spain’s Ministry of Digital Transformation, such content must be identified as AI-generated “in a clear and distinguishable manner no later than the time of the first interaction or exposure,” aligning with the regulations set forth in the EU AI Act.

EU AI Act Overview

Initially introduced in 2021, the EU AI Act underwent extensive deliberation before being passed in March 2024. It came into force in member states in August 2024 and will be fully applicable by August 2, 2026, allowing entities time to comply with its requirements.

The Act establishes risk-based rules that AI developers and deployers must follow regarding specific AI applications and prohibits the commercialization of certain AI uses. One notable provision prohibits the use of biometric data for training algorithms utilized in criminal profiling by law enforcement, marking a significant step towards minimizing bias in AI technologies. However, exemptions for national security and border control agencies have raised concerns about balancing security and individual rights.

Key Provisions of the Spanish AI Bill

The Spanish AI bill stipulates fines of up to 35 million euros or 7% of a company’s global annual turnover for improper labeling of AI content. Additionally, fines may be imposed for the failure to implement human supervision of AI systems that use biometrics for various industrial applications, with penalties ranging from €500,000 to €7.5 million or between 1% and 2% of global turnover.

AI and Deepfake Regulation in India

In contrast, AI regulation in India remains inconsistent, with the government oscillating between establishing a comprehensive AI framework and maintaining a light-touch regulatory approach. Recently, the Indian government proposed the creation of an AI Governance Board to oversee and authorize AI applications, but deepfake regulation has not been adequately addressed.

During the last general and state elections, numerous political figures and parties misused deepfakes for misinformation campaigns. In response, the Indian government reiterated the existing IT rules, with some officials suggesting that legislation regarding deepfakes may emerge if deemed necessary.

This development in Spain highlights the increasing global scrutiny and regulatory efforts aimed at managing the implications of AI technology, particularly concerning deepfake content and its potential misuse in various contexts.

More Insights

Responsible AI Workflows for Transforming UX Research

The article discusses how AI can transform UX research by improving efficiency and enabling deeper insights, while emphasizing the importance of human oversight to avoid biases and inaccuracies. It...

Revolutionizing Banking with Agentic AI

Agentic AI is transforming the banking sector by automating complex processes, enhancing customer experiences, and ensuring regulatory compliance. However, it also introduces challenges related to...

AI-Driven Compliance: The Future of Scalable Crypto Infrastructure

The explosive growth of the crypto industry has brought about numerous regulatory challenges, making AI-native compliance systems essential for scalability and operational efficiency. These systems...

ASEAN’s Evolving AI Governance Landscape

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is making progress toward AI governance through an innovation-friendly approach, but growing AI-related risks highlight the need for more binding...

EU AI Act vs. US AI Action Plan: A Risk Perspective

Dr. Cari Miller discusses the differences between the EU AI Act and the US AI Action Plan, highlighting that the EU framework is much more risk-aware and imposes binding obligations on high-risk AI...

The Hidden Risks of AI Integration in the Workplace

As organizations rush to adopt AI, many are ignoring the critical risks involved, such as compliance and oversight issues. Without proper governance and human management, AI can quickly become a...

Investing in AI Safety: Capitalizing on the Future of Responsible Innovation

The AI safety collaboration imperative is becoming essential as the artificial intelligence revolution reshapes industries and daily life. Investors are encouraged to capitalize on this opportunity by...

AI Innovations in Modern Policing

Law enforcement agencies are increasingly leveraging artificial intelligence to enhance their operations, particularly in predictive policing. The integration of technology offers immense potential...

Kenya’s Pivotal Role in UN’s Groundbreaking AI Governance Agreement

Kenya has achieved a significant diplomatic success by leading the establishment of two landmark institutions for governing artificial intelligence (AI) at the United Nations. The Independent...