Southeast Asia’s Unique Approach to AI Safety Governance

AI Safety Governance: The Southeast Asian Approach

The conversation surrounding AI safety is predominantly influenced by the perspectives of the United States, Europe, and China. However, the voices from Southeast Asia remain underrepresented in the global discourse on AI governance. Despite this, many Southeast Asian countries have made significant advancements in digital and AI policy, recognizing the potential of AI while adopting pragmatic strategies for its safe development.

Current Developments in AI Governance Across Southeast Asia

This report outlines recent trends in AI governance across 11 Southeast Asian nations, including Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Timor-Leste, and Vietnam.

Through six roundtable discussions organized by AI Safety Asia (AISA), stakeholders from various sectors—government, private, academic, and civil society—convened to share insights and identify regional priority areas for the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). These discussions facilitated the development of comprehensive strategies aimed at enhancing AI safety over the next five years.

Harmonizing Approaches and Building Capacity

To mitigate friction arising from differing national strategies, it is essential for ASEAN to harmonize its approaches and strengthen cooperation in areas such as capacity building, research, and catastrophic risk management. National governments can pursue impactful strategies while actively engaging with regional and international partners.

Challenges and Gaps in AI Policy

The report highlights several persistent challenges in AI policy across the region, notably the need for national AI risk management plans. Addressing these gaps is crucial for the advancement of a coherent and effective AI governance framework.

Context-Aware AI Governance

The Southeast Asian approach to AI governance offers valuable lessons for other global majority countries. The region’s cultural diversity and varying levels of development have led to a context-aware strategy that emphasizes:

  • Open-source AI development
  • Multilingual large language models (LLMs)
  • Inclusive AI governance processes

These priorities ensure that AI policies are tailored to the unique needs and circumstances of the region.

A Call to Action

This report serves as a call to action for Southeast Asian nations to close significant policy gaps, fostering an inclusive, safe, and innovative AI future. By leveraging their unique context and collaborative potential, these countries can contribute meaningfully to the global dialogue on AI safety governance.

For a detailed exploration of the findings and recommendations, the full report is available for download.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...