South Korea’s AI Legislation Sets Global Standards

South Korea’s Comprehensive AI Legislation: An Overview

On January 16, 2025, South Korea made a significant leap in the realm of artificial intelligence regulation by passing the “Basic Act on the Development of Artificial Intelligence and the Establishment of Trust.” This legislation positions South Korea as the second jurisdiction to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for AI, following the European Union.

Key Takeaways from the AI Basic Act

  • South Korea’s National Assembly has successfully integrated 19 separate proposals from various political factions into a single legislative framework.
  • Similar to the EU’s AI Act, the new South Korean AI regulation imposes stricter requirements on high-impact AI systems.

Goals of the AI Basic Act

The main objective of the AI Basic Act is to promote AI innovation while addressing crucial ethical, safety, and societal concerns. By consolidating multiple proposals, the Act aims to create a unified structure that can guide AI development responsibly.

Key Provisions of the Act

The act emphasizes several critical components:

  • Transparency Requirements: AI systems must operate transparently to ensure trust among users.
  • Ethical Guidelines: A set of ethical standards will govern the development and deployment of AI technologies.
  • Classification Framework: AI systems will be categorized based on their potential impact, particularly focusing on high-impact AI systems.

Businesses that fail to comply with these regulations may face fines of up to 30 million KRW (approximately $20,500), underscoring the seriousness of adherence.

Comparative Analysis with the EU AI Act

The South Korean AI Basic Act shares notable similarities with the EU AI Act, particularly in its risk-based approach to regulation. Both frameworks:

  • Classify AI systems according to their potential impact on human rights and safety.
  • Impose stricter requirements on high-risk or high-impact AI applications.
  • Stress the necessity for transparency and ethical guidelines.
  • Establish oversight bodies to ensure responsible AI development.

A Global Perspective on AI Regulation

The recent legislative actions in South Korea and the EU reflect a growing international consensus regarding the regulation of AI technologies. While some industry experts warn that overregulation may stifle innovation, there is a rising recognition among policymakers of the need for dedicated legislation to govern this rapidly evolving field.

Other countries, including the U.K. and Japan, are also actively discussing AI legislation, with new laws expected to emerge in 2025. These developments highlight a global trend toward establishing robust regulatory frameworks that balance the need for AI innovation with ethical considerations and public safety.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...