AI act implementation services that help you configure AI Sigil for your organization: register your AI systems, activate the right frameworks under the EU AI Act, ISO 42001 and NIST AI RMF, and get your team working in the platform.
All AI act implementation services are delivered through our network of vetted consulting partners: governance and compliance specialists selected for their expertise in AI regulation and hands-on platform experience.
Your consulting partner documents every AI system in your portfolio, maps their components, data flows, stakeholders, and roles, and classifies each system against the regulations and frameworks that apply to your organization.
our partner activates and validates the right regulatory frameworks per system, sets up evidence collection workflows, links existing documents to the correct controls, and configures cross-framework deduplication.
Structured training program led by your partner: guided walkthroughs, first control assessments completed together, and hands-on practice until your team is fully comfortable with the platform.
Your partner conducts a final review to confirm the full setup is complete, regulatory mappings are accurate, evidence workflows are operational, and your team is fully ready to operate independently.
Every AI act implementation services engagement follows five stages. Duration varies by portfolio size and organizational complexity.
A discovery session brings together your AI, legal, compliance, and engineering stakeholders. The objective of this stage of the AI act implementation services: build a complete picture of your AI portfolio.
How many systems are in production or development. Who owns them, what data they process, where they sit in your org structure. Which regulations apply (EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, sector-specific). How mature your current governance practices are relative to target state.
The output is a scoping document covering the engagement plan, key milestones, resource requirements, and a prioritized sequence for the stages that follow.
Estimated duration: Startup 2.5 weeks / SME 5 weeks / Large Enterprise 10 weeks.
Every AI system is registered in the platform through structured sessions with system owners. For each system, the following is documented:
Risk classification workshops then walk your team through tiering decisions (high-risk, limited-risk, minimal-risk under the EU AI Act) and determine your role per system (provider, deployer, or both).
The result: a fully populated AI registry in AI Sigil with each system correctly categorized, its dependencies mapped, and its regulatory obligations identified.
Estimated duration: Startup 5 weeks / SME 10 weeks / Large Enterprise 20 weeks
The regulatory frameworks that apply to each AI system are activated based on classification results. From there:
This stage ends with every system connected to its applicable controls and a clear picture of what remains before audit readiness.
Estimated duration: Startup 5 weeks / SME 10 weeks / Large Enterprise 15 weeks
A structured training program is delivered, tailored to each role in your governance organization:
Internal governance processes and standard operating procedures are documented directly in the platform. Your team leaves with a single reference for how assessments, escalations, and reviews should be conducted after handoff.
Estimated duration: Startup 2.5 weeks / SME 5 weeks / Large Enterprise 10 weeks
A comprehensive configuration audit covers every layer of the setup:
A regulatory mapping check confirms no obligation has been missed or incorrectly linked. Your governance lead walks through a readiness checklist covering documentation completeness, assessment progress, and audit trail integrity.
The stage concludes with a formal sign-off confirming the platform is production-ready, and a handoff document summarizing the configuration, open items, and recommendations for ongoing operations.
Estimated duration: Startup 2.5 weeks / SME 5 weeks / Large Enterprise 10 weeks
Organizations approach EU AI Act compliance through three delivery models, each with different cost and risk profiles:
The result: AI act implementation services that produce a running compliance operation, not a one-off project deliverable.
The EU AI Act tier most teams underestimate is the high-risk one: the Annex III use cases (employment, education, critical infrastructure, law enforcement, biometric categorization) come with the longest list of obligations and the tightest documentation requirements, and they are scheduled for full application in August 2026.
AI act implementation services in this format work backwards from that deadline. Risk classification, technical documentation, conformity assessment readiness, post-market monitoring setup, and serious incident reporting workflows are sequenced into a plan your team can actually execute.
Engagement scope is sized to your portfolio: a deployer with three high-risk systems is not the same project as a provider preparing for a conformity assessment, and the engagement shape reflects that.