Europe’s Advanced AI Strategy and the Role of the Scientific Panelh2>
On March 13, 2024, the European Parliament passed the b>AI Actb>, marking a significant step in regulating artificial intelligence within Europe. A month later, the European Commission concluded its call for expressions of interest for the b>AI Scientific Panelb>, which will play a crucial role in advising the European AI Office on the implementation of this landmark legislation.p>
Composition and Responsibilities of the AI Scientific Panelh3>
The panel will consist of b>60 independent expertsb> serving two-year terms starting in 2026. Their primary focus will be on b>general-purpose AI (GPAI)b> systems, which include models like b>ChatGPTb>, b>Claudeb>, and b>Geminib>. Responsibilities will include:p>
-
li>Providing guidance on systemic risks and model classificationli>
li>Developing evaluation methodologiesli>
li>Conducting cross-border market surveillanceli>
li>Monitoring emerging AI risks that may arise unexpectedlyli>
ul>
The Commission faces the challenge of selecting the right individuals with profound technological expertise from a large pool of applicants, a positive sign given the hundreds of responses to the call.p>
National Quotas and Selection Challengesh3>
However, the selection process is complicated by the b>national quotasb> imposed by member states, which require each to have at least one representative on the panel. This means that 80% of the panel must consist of experts from the EU or b>European Free Trade Association (EFTA)b> states. This requirement raises questions about the feasibility of finding suitable candidates from smaller nations, such as b>Maltab> or b>Cyprusb>, which may struggle to identify qualified individuals.p>
Recommendations for Panel Compositionh3>
To effectively navigate the rapid developments in advanced AI, it is suggested that the European Commission prioritize expertise over national representation. Rather than adhering strictly to quotas, the Commission should focus on recruiting world-renowned AI researchers with a track record in:p>
-
li>Monitoring frontier developmentsli>
li>Assessing risks associated with GPAIli>
li>Bringing independent evaluations to the tableli>
ul>
Furthermore, it is essential to include younger voices in the panel, particularly individuals in their b>20s and 30sb>, who are actively engaged in shaping frontier AI developments.p>
Conclusionh3>
The establishment of the AI Scientific Panel presents a unique opportunity for Europe to engage top-tier national and international experts in digital governance. It is critical, however, that the selection process remains focused on the best candidates for the task rather than being overly influenced by member state recommendations.p>
Ultimately, the selection should prioritize true subject-matter expertise from across Europe and beyond, ensuring a balanced representation of both seasoned professionals and innovative younger voices.p>
