Revolutionizing Liability: The Impact of New EU Regulations on AI and Products

A New Liability Framework for Products and AI

The introduction of the EU’s landmark Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) marks a significant shift in how liability is assigned in the realm of technology. This comprehensive legal framework for AI, effective from 1 August 2024, has prompted a reevaluation of the EU’s liability rules, particularly in light of the unique risks associated with digital technologies.

The New EU Product Liability Directive (PLD)

One of the most pivotal changes is the new EU Product Liability Directive (EU) 2024/2853 (PLD), which replaces the nearly 40-year-old predecessor. The new PLD imposes strict, or “no-fault”, liability on manufacturers, suppliers, and other entities for defective products. Enforced from 8 December 2024, member states have until 9 December 2026 to integrate these rules into their national laws.

This directive aims to provide a robust legal framework to address the challenges posed by products that integrate software and AI. It ensures that users alleging harm from these technologies have a clear legal pathway to seek compensation.

Key Provisions of the New PLD

The new PLD introduces several essential changes:

  • Expanded Definition of “Product”: This now includes digital manufacturing files and standalone software, with AI also classified as a product.

More Insights

Responsible AI Workflows for Transforming UX Research

The article discusses how AI can transform UX research by improving efficiency and enabling deeper insights, while emphasizing the importance of human oversight to avoid biases and inaccuracies. It...

Revolutionizing Banking with Agentic AI

Agentic AI is transforming the banking sector by automating complex processes, enhancing customer experiences, and ensuring regulatory compliance. However, it also introduces challenges related to...

AI-Driven Compliance: The Future of Scalable Crypto Infrastructure

The explosive growth of the crypto industry has brought about numerous regulatory challenges, making AI-native compliance systems essential for scalability and operational efficiency. These systems...

ASEAN’s Evolving AI Governance Landscape

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is making progress toward AI governance through an innovation-friendly approach, but growing AI-related risks highlight the need for more binding...

EU AI Act vs. US AI Action Plan: A Risk Perspective

Dr. Cari Miller discusses the differences between the EU AI Act and the US AI Action Plan, highlighting that the EU framework is much more risk-aware and imposes binding obligations on high-risk AI...

The Hidden Risks of AI Integration in the Workplace

As organizations rush to adopt AI, many are ignoring the critical risks involved, such as compliance and oversight issues. Without proper governance and human management, AI can quickly become a...

Investing in AI Safety: Capitalizing on the Future of Responsible Innovation

The AI safety collaboration imperative is becoming essential as the artificial intelligence revolution reshapes industries and daily life. Investors are encouraged to capitalize on this opportunity by...

AI Innovations in Modern Policing

Law enforcement agencies are increasingly leveraging artificial intelligence to enhance their operations, particularly in predictive policing. The integration of technology offers immense potential...

Kenya’s Pivotal Role in UN’s Groundbreaking AI Governance Agreement

Kenya has achieved a significant diplomatic success by leading the establishment of two landmark institutions for governing artificial intelligence (AI) at the United Nations. The Independent...