Prioritizing AI Governance in the Commonwealth Caribbean

Prioritizing AI Governance in the Commonwealth Caribbean

As the Fourth Industrial Revolution unfolds, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a critical focal point for governments globally. The Commonwealth Caribbean is beginning to recognize the importance of dedicated governance structures to manage this rapidly evolving technology.

The Establishment of AI-Focused Ministries

In June 2025, Trinidad and Tobago made a significant move by establishing the Commonwealth Caribbean’s first dedicated AI-focused government ministry. This initiative places Trinidad and Tobago alongside nations like the United Arab Emirates and Canada, which have also created ministries specifically tasked with overseeing AI.

This ministry aims to develop comprehensive AI policies, governance frameworks, and innovation strategies, positioning Trinidad and Tobago as a leader in the region regarding AI governance.

Judicial Oversight and AI Governance

Prior to the formation of the Ministry of Public Administration and Artificial Intelligence, the High Court of Trinidad and Tobago addressed the implications of using generative AI tools in legal contexts. In the case of Nexgen Pathology Services Ltd v Darceuil Duncan, the court admonished legal practitioners for citing AI-generated case law without verification, highlighting the risks associated with AI hallucinations.

The court’s ruling emphasized the need for rigorous scrutiny of AI outputs to prevent misleading the judicial process, thereby reinforcing the importance of ethical standards in AI governance.

Regional Implications of AI Governance

Despite Trinidad and Tobago’s proactive approach, many Commonwealth Caribbean countries have yet to establish similar governance structures. The increasing deployment of AI systems, particularly facial recognition technologies (FRTs), raises concerns about fundamental rights and ethical implications.

Countries like Guyana and The Bahamas are exploring the use of FRTs as tools for crime prevention. However, these technologies have been criticized for their potential to infringe on individual rights, particularly for marginalized communities.

The Necessity for Robust Regulatory Frameworks

The deployment of high-risk AI systems, such as FRTs, necessitates robust regulatory oversight to mitigate risks associated with misidentification and bias. Historical cases in the United States have illustrated the dangers of relying on flawed AI outputs, which have led to wrongful arrests, primarily affecting people of color.

As Trinidad and Tobago takes the lead in AI governance, establishing a ministry dedicated to this purpose signals a commitment to ethical standards and responsible technology deployment throughout the region.

Conclusion: The Call for Regional Action

With the rapid advancement of AI technologies, it is imperative for Commonwealth Caribbean governments to prioritize AI governance. Inaction could result in significant economic loss, social disparities, and violations of citizens’ rights. Trinidad and Tobago’s pioneering efforts should inspire regional counterparts to adopt similar frameworks for the ethical governance of AI.

More Insights

Transforming AI Governance: The EU Act’s Framework Against Super AI Risks

The EU AI Act establishes a risk-based framework that categorizes AI systems based on their potential harm, imposing strict regulations on high-risk and prohibited uses to enhance human oversight and...

EU AI Act: Key Changes and Future Implications

The EU AI Act reached a significant milestone on August 2, 2025, marking the beginning of real obligations for general-purpose AI models. Providers must now meet specific requirements to enter the EU...

AI Copyright Dilemma in the EU

The European Union's implementation of the Artificial Intelligence Act introduces new guidelines that aim to balance AI growth with copyright compliance, but this creates significant challenges for...

EU AI Act: Key Compliance Dates and Implications for Medtech

The EU AI Act has come into effect, imposing compliance requirements for AI systems, especially high-risk ones, with penalties starting as of August 2, 2025. Companies must prepare for full...

China’s AI Content Labeling: Key Compliance Insights for Businesses

China has implemented new AI labeling rules that require clear identification of AI-generated content across various media when distributed on Chinese platforms. Companies must adapt their content...

Building Secure and Ethical AI in an Evolving Threat Landscape

Sam Peters, Chief Product Officer at ISMS.online, discusses the importance of building secure and ethical AI models in a rapidly evolving threat landscape, emphasizing that compliance must be the...

AI Recruitment Compliance: Key Insights for Employers in Bulgaria and the EU

Artificial intelligence is increasingly influencing recruitment practices, offering a data-driven approach that can streamline hiring processes and reduce human bias. However, the use of AI also...

EU AI Act: Setting the Standard for Global Super AI Regulation

The EU AI Act pioneers global super AI regulation through its risk-based framework, categorizing AI systems by their potential harm and implementing tailored controls to protect society. By focusing...

Classifying Your AI System Under the EU AI Act Made Easy

The EU AI Act categorizes AI systems into four risk levels: Unacceptable, High-risk, Limited, and Minimal. Genbounty offers a free Risk Classification Wizard to help teams quickly determine their...