Prioritizing AI Governance in the Commonwealth Caribbean

Prioritizing AI Governance in the Commonwealth Caribbean

As the Fourth Industrial Revolution unfolds, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a critical focal point for governments globally. The Commonwealth Caribbean is beginning to recognize the importance of dedicated governance structures to manage this rapidly evolving technology.

The Establishment of AI-Focused Ministries

In June 2025, Trinidad and Tobago made a significant move by establishing the Commonwealth Caribbean’s first dedicated AI-focused government ministry. This initiative places Trinidad and Tobago alongside nations like the United Arab Emirates and Canada, which have also created ministries specifically tasked with overseeing AI.

This ministry aims to develop comprehensive AI policies, governance frameworks, and innovation strategies, positioning Trinidad and Tobago as a leader in the region regarding AI governance.

Judicial Oversight and AI Governance

Prior to the formation of the Ministry of Public Administration and Artificial Intelligence, the High Court of Trinidad and Tobago addressed the implications of using generative AI tools in legal contexts. In the case of Nexgen Pathology Services Ltd v Darceuil Duncan, the court admonished legal practitioners for citing AI-generated case law without verification, highlighting the risks associated with AI hallucinations.

The court’s ruling emphasized the need for rigorous scrutiny of AI outputs to prevent misleading the judicial process, thereby reinforcing the importance of ethical standards in AI governance.

Regional Implications of AI Governance

Despite Trinidad and Tobago’s proactive approach, many Commonwealth Caribbean countries have yet to establish similar governance structures. The increasing deployment of AI systems, particularly facial recognition technologies (FRTs), raises concerns about fundamental rights and ethical implications.

Countries like Guyana and The Bahamas are exploring the use of FRTs as tools for crime prevention. However, these technologies have been criticized for their potential to infringe on individual rights, particularly for marginalized communities.

The Necessity for Robust Regulatory Frameworks

The deployment of high-risk AI systems, such as FRTs, necessitates robust regulatory oversight to mitigate risks associated with misidentification and bias. Historical cases in the United States have illustrated the dangers of relying on flawed AI outputs, which have led to wrongful arrests, primarily affecting people of color.

As Trinidad and Tobago takes the lead in AI governance, establishing a ministry dedicated to this purpose signals a commitment to ethical standards and responsible technology deployment throughout the region.

Conclusion: The Call for Regional Action

With the rapid advancement of AI technologies, it is imperative for Commonwealth Caribbean governments to prioritize AI governance. Inaction could result in significant economic loss, social disparities, and violations of citizens’ rights. Trinidad and Tobago’s pioneering efforts should inspire regional counterparts to adopt similar frameworks for the ethical governance of AI.

More Insights

Responsible AI Strategies for Enterprise Success

In this post, Joseph Jude discusses the complexities of implementing Responsible AI in enterprise applications, emphasizing the conflict between ideal principles and real-world business pressures. He...

EU Guidelines on AI Models: Preparing for Systemic Risk Compliance

The European Commission has issued guidelines to assist AI models identified as having systemic risks in complying with the EU's artificial intelligence regulation, known as the AI Act. Companies face...

Governance in the Age of AI: Balancing Opportunity and Risk

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming business operations and decision-making processes in the Philippines, with the domestic AI market projected to reach nearly $950 million by 2025...

Microsoft Embraces EU AI Code While Meta Withdraws

Microsoft is expected to sign the European Union's code of practice for artificial intelligence, while Meta Platforms has declined to do so, citing legal uncertainties. The code aims to ensure...

Microsoft Embraces EU AI Code While Meta Withdraws

Microsoft is expected to sign the European Union's code of practice for artificial intelligence, while Meta Platforms has declined to do so, citing legal uncertainties. The code aims to ensure...

Colorado’s Groundbreaking AI Law Sets New Compliance Standards

Analysts note that Colorado's upcoming AI law, which takes effect on February 1, 2026, is notable for its comprehensive requirements, mandating businesses to adopt risk management programs for...

Strengthening Ethical AI: Malaysia’s Action Plan for 2026-2030

Malaysia's upcoming AI Technology Action Plan 2026–2030 aims to enhance ethical safeguards and governance frameworks for artificial intelligence, as announced by Digital Minister Gobind Singh Deo. The...

Simultaneous Strategies for AI Governance

The development of responsible Artificial Intelligence (AI) policies and overall AI strategies must occur simultaneously to ensure alignment with intended purposes and core values. Bhutan's unique...

Guidelines for AI Models with Systemic Risks Under EU Regulations

The European Commission has issued guidelines to assist AI models deemed to have systemic risks in complying with the EU's AI Act, which will take effect on August 2. These guidelines aim to clarify...