Prioritizing AI Governance in the Commonwealth Caribbean

Prioritizing AI Governance in the Commonwealth Caribbean

As the Fourth Industrial Revolution unfolds, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a critical focal point for governments globally. The Commonwealth Caribbean is beginning to recognize the importance of dedicated governance structures to manage this rapidly evolving technology.

The Establishment of AI-Focused Ministries

In June 2025, Trinidad and Tobago made a significant move by establishing the Commonwealth Caribbean’s first dedicated AI-focused government ministry. This initiative places Trinidad and Tobago alongside nations like the United Arab Emirates and Canada, which have also created ministries specifically tasked with overseeing AI.

This ministry aims to develop comprehensive AI policies, governance frameworks, and innovation strategies, positioning Trinidad and Tobago as a leader in the region regarding AI governance.

Judicial Oversight and AI Governance

Prior to the formation of the Ministry of Public Administration and Artificial Intelligence, the High Court of Trinidad and Tobago addressed the implications of using generative AI tools in legal contexts. In the case of Nexgen Pathology Services Ltd v Darceuil Duncan, the court admonished legal practitioners for citing AI-generated case law without verification, highlighting the risks associated with AI hallucinations.

The court’s ruling emphasized the need for rigorous scrutiny of AI outputs to prevent misleading the judicial process, thereby reinforcing the importance of ethical standards in AI governance.

Regional Implications of AI Governance

Despite Trinidad and Tobago’s proactive approach, many Commonwealth Caribbean countries have yet to establish similar governance structures. The increasing deployment of AI systems, particularly facial recognition technologies (FRTs), raises concerns about fundamental rights and ethical implications.

Countries like Guyana and The Bahamas are exploring the use of FRTs as tools for crime prevention. However, these technologies have been criticized for their potential to infringe on individual rights, particularly for marginalized communities.

The Necessity for Robust Regulatory Frameworks

The deployment of high-risk AI systems, such as FRTs, necessitates robust regulatory oversight to mitigate risks associated with misidentification and bias. Historical cases in the United States have illustrated the dangers of relying on flawed AI outputs, which have led to wrongful arrests, primarily affecting people of color.

As Trinidad and Tobago takes the lead in AI governance, establishing a ministry dedicated to this purpose signals a commitment to ethical standards and responsible technology deployment throughout the region.

Conclusion: The Call for Regional Action

With the rapid advancement of AI technologies, it is imperative for Commonwealth Caribbean governments to prioritize AI governance. Inaction could result in significant economic loss, social disparities, and violations of citizens’ rights. Trinidad and Tobago’s pioneering efforts should inspire regional counterparts to adopt similar frameworks for the ethical governance of AI.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...