Prioritizing AI Governance in the Commonwealth Caribbean

Prioritizing AI Governance in the Commonwealth Caribbean

As the Fourth Industrial Revolution unfolds, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a critical focal point for governments globally. The Commonwealth Caribbean is beginning to recognize the importance of dedicated governance structures to manage this rapidly evolving technology.

The Establishment of AI-Focused Ministries

In June 2025, Trinidad and Tobago made a significant move by establishing the Commonwealth Caribbean’s first dedicated AI-focused government ministry. This initiative places Trinidad and Tobago alongside nations like the United Arab Emirates and Canada, which have also created ministries specifically tasked with overseeing AI.

This ministry aims to develop comprehensive AI policies, governance frameworks, and innovation strategies, positioning Trinidad and Tobago as a leader in the region regarding AI governance.

Judicial Oversight and AI Governance

Prior to the formation of the Ministry of Public Administration and Artificial Intelligence, the High Court of Trinidad and Tobago addressed the implications of using generative AI tools in legal contexts. In the case of Nexgen Pathology Services Ltd v Darceuil Duncan, the court admonished legal practitioners for citing AI-generated case law without verification, highlighting the risks associated with AI hallucinations.

The court’s ruling emphasized the need for rigorous scrutiny of AI outputs to prevent misleading the judicial process, thereby reinforcing the importance of ethical standards in AI governance.

Regional Implications of AI Governance

Despite Trinidad and Tobago’s proactive approach, many Commonwealth Caribbean countries have yet to establish similar governance structures. The increasing deployment of AI systems, particularly facial recognition technologies (FRTs), raises concerns about fundamental rights and ethical implications.

Countries like Guyana and The Bahamas are exploring the use of FRTs as tools for crime prevention. However, these technologies have been criticized for their potential to infringe on individual rights, particularly for marginalized communities.

The Necessity for Robust Regulatory Frameworks

The deployment of high-risk AI systems, such as FRTs, necessitates robust regulatory oversight to mitigate risks associated with misidentification and bias. Historical cases in the United States have illustrated the dangers of relying on flawed AI outputs, which have led to wrongful arrests, primarily affecting people of color.

As Trinidad and Tobago takes the lead in AI governance, establishing a ministry dedicated to this purpose signals a commitment to ethical standards and responsible technology deployment throughout the region.

Conclusion: The Call for Regional Action

With the rapid advancement of AI technologies, it is imperative for Commonwealth Caribbean governments to prioritize AI governance. Inaction could result in significant economic loss, social disparities, and violations of citizens’ rights. Trinidad and Tobago’s pioneering efforts should inspire regional counterparts to adopt similar frameworks for the ethical governance of AI.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...