Preparing for the EU AI Act: Essential Steps for Medical Device Companies

Preparing for the EU Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act: Key Considerations for the Medical Device Industry

The EU AI Act came into force on 1 August 2024 and is set to reshape the MedTech sector, significantly impacting the use of medical devices in Scotland and beyond. This legislation presents a fundamental shift in how medical technologies will be regulated and monitored, with implications not just for European businesses but for any organization marketing or using AI-based medical devices in the EU.

Why Compliance Matters

With almost two-thirds of UK healthcare organizations already leveraging AI in their operations, the EU AI Act represents a crucial framework for ensuring safety, efficacy, and compliance in AI applications. If a medical device utilizes AI and is used or marketed in the EU, it must adhere to the Act’s requirements, regardless of the company’s location.

As the EU AI Act becomes enforceable by 2026, organizations must begin their preparations now, particularly those dealing with EU partners or customers. Compliance is essential not only to avoid penalties but also to build trust and enhance the quality of healthcare services.

Understanding High-Risk Systems

Healthcare organizations need to pay special attention to high-risk systems. Medical devices that incorporate AI or operate as independent AI systems will be categorized as high-risk due to their potential impact on patient health and safety. This classification triggers a series of stringent technical compliance measures that must be met.

Technical Compliance Requirements

To aid businesses in navigating the classification of high-risk AI systems, the following technical compliance requirements must be adopted:

  • Comprehensive Risk Management Systems: AI systems in medical devices must have a robust, ongoing risk management process that includes monitoring throughout the product’s lifecycle, not just during design and development phases.
  • Regulatory Quality Standards: High-quality, compliant data sets are critical for the safety and performance of AI-driven medical devices. Poor data quality can compromise diagnostic or therapeutic decisions, endangering patients and risking non-compliance with the EU AI Act.
  • Technical Documentation: Companies must produce technical documentation to demonstrate compliance and ensure human oversight. This is crucial for high-risk AI systems that may make diagnostic or therapeutic decisions.
  • Accuracy, Robustness, and Cybersecurity: AI-powered devices must be designed with cybersecurity safeguards, as outlined by the Act. Companies should provide deployers with comprehensive instructions for use (IFUs) to ensure the safe use of medical devices.

Consequences of Non-Compliance

Penalties for non-compliance can be severe, including fines of up to 6% of global annual turnover. Inadequate data management, poor oversight, and weak risk management frameworks could lead to companies being pushed out of the market. Therefore, immediate preparation is essential.

Embracing the Opportunity

As AI innovation accelerates, regulators are striving to keep pace. While compliance with the EU AI Act may present challenges, it also offers an opportunity for organizations to enhance their systems and build trust in their products. Scottish healthcare organizations and the broader MedTech sector must proactively adapt to these regulations to thrive in a rapidly changing landscape.

More Insights

US Rejects UN’s Call for Global AI Governance Framework

U.S. officials rejected the establishment of a global AI governance framework at the United Nations General Assembly, despite broad support from many nations, including China. Michael Kratsios of the...

Agentic AI: Managing the Risks of Autonomous Systems

As companies increasingly adopt agentic AI systems for autonomous decision-making, they face the emerging challenge of agentic AI sprawl, which can lead to security vulnerabilities and operational...

AI as a New Opinion Gatekeeper: Addressing Hidden Biases

As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into sectors like healthcare and finance, a new study highlights the potential for subtle biases in AI systems to distort public...

AI Accountability: A New Era of Regulation and Compliance

The burgeoning world of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is at a critical juncture as regulatory actions signal a new era of accountability and ethical deployment. Recent events highlight the shift...

Choosing Effective AI Governance Tools for Safer Adoption

As generative AI continues to evolve, so do the associated risks, making AI governance tools essential for managing these challenges. This initiative, in collaboration with Tokio Marine Group, aims to...

UN Initiatives for Trustworthy AI Governance

The United Nations is working to influence global policy on artificial intelligence by establishing an expert panel to develop standards for "safe, secure and trustworthy" AI. This initiative aims to...

Data-Driven Governance: Shaping AI Regulation in Singapore

The conversation between Thomas Roehm from SAS and Frankie Phua from United Overseas Bank at the SAS Innovate On Tour in Singapore explores how data-driven regulation can effectively govern rapidly...

Preparing SMEs for EU AI Compliance Challenges

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) must navigate the complexities of the EU AI Act, which categorizes many AI applications as "high-risk" and imposes strict compliance requirements. To adapt...

Draft Guidance on Reporting Serious Incidents Under the EU AI Act

On September 26, 2025, the European Commission published draft guidance on serious incident reporting requirements for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act. Organizations developing or deploying...