Oregon’s AI Regulations: Adapting Old Laws for New Technologies

Oregon’s AI Guidance: Old Laws in Scope for New AI

The Oregon Attorney General’s Office, in conjunction with the state’s Department of Justice, has issued guidance regarding the application of existing state laws to the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) by businesses. Released late last year, this guidance emphasizes the need for companies to understand how their use of AI may be regulated under current legislation.

Key Laws Affecting AI Usage

The guidance highlights several Oregon state laws that may apply to a company’s use of AI, including:

  • Consumer Privacy Act – Oregon’s comprehensive privacy law that mandates transparency regarding the use of personal information.
  • Unlawful Trade Practices Act – Prohibits deceptive practices in commerce.
  • Equality Act – Addresses discrimination based on protected characteristics.
  • Consumer Information Protection Act – Focuses on data security and the handling of personal information.

Key Takeaways from the Guidance

Several important considerations have been outlined in the guidance that companies must adhere to when implementing AI technologies:

  • Notice: Companies must disclose how they use personal information with AI tools. Failure to do so could be viewed as a violation of Oregon’s privacy laws, particularly if there are known issues with AI tools that could mislead users.
  • Choice: Under the Consumer Privacy Act, consent is required before processing sensitive information. Companies must provide consumers with the ability to withdraw consent and opt out of AI profiling for significant decisions.
  • Transparency: Organizations must be clear about when users are interacting with AI tools and avoid misleading claims regarding the capabilities of AI. For instance, using AI-generated voices in robocalls without disclosing the caller’s identity could lead to legal issues.
  • Bias: Any AI application that discriminates based on race, gender, or other protected characteristics is in violation of the Equality Act. Companies are urged to ensure their AI solutions do not perpetuate bias.
  • Security: The guidance insists that organizations comply with data security laws when using AI tools that incorporate personal information, emphasizing the need for “reasonable safeguards” to protect such data.

This comprehensive approach to AI regulation in Oregon serves as a crucial reminder for businesses to remain vigilant about their legal obligations while leveraging new technologies. As AI continues to evolve, understanding the intersection of technology and law will be paramount for organizations seeking to innovate responsibly.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...