Oregon’s AI Regulations: Adapting Old Laws for New Technologies

Oregon’s AI Guidance: Old Laws in Scope for New AI

The Oregon Attorney General’s Office, in conjunction with the state’s Department of Justice, has issued guidance regarding the application of existing state laws to the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) by businesses. Released late last year, this guidance emphasizes the need for companies to understand how their use of AI may be regulated under current legislation.

Key Laws Affecting AI Usage

The guidance highlights several Oregon state laws that may apply to a company’s use of AI, including:

  • Consumer Privacy Act – Oregon’s comprehensive privacy law that mandates transparency regarding the use of personal information.
  • Unlawful Trade Practices Act – Prohibits deceptive practices in commerce.
  • Equality Act – Addresses discrimination based on protected characteristics.
  • Consumer Information Protection Act – Focuses on data security and the handling of personal information.

Key Takeaways from the Guidance

Several important considerations have been outlined in the guidance that companies must adhere to when implementing AI technologies:

  • Notice: Companies must disclose how they use personal information with AI tools. Failure to do so could be viewed as a violation of Oregon’s privacy laws, particularly if there are known issues with AI tools that could mislead users.
  • Choice: Under the Consumer Privacy Act, consent is required before processing sensitive information. Companies must provide consumers with the ability to withdraw consent and opt out of AI profiling for significant decisions.
  • Transparency: Organizations must be clear about when users are interacting with AI tools and avoid misleading claims regarding the capabilities of AI. For instance, using AI-generated voices in robocalls without disclosing the caller’s identity could lead to legal issues.
  • Bias: Any AI application that discriminates based on race, gender, or other protected characteristics is in violation of the Equality Act. Companies are urged to ensure their AI solutions do not perpetuate bias.
  • Security: The guidance insists that organizations comply with data security laws when using AI tools that incorporate personal information, emphasizing the need for “reasonable safeguards” to protect such data.

This comprehensive approach to AI regulation in Oregon serves as a crucial reminder for businesses to remain vigilant about their legal obligations while leveraging new technologies. As AI continues to evolve, understanding the intersection of technology and law will be paramount for organizations seeking to innovate responsibly.

More Insights

AI Governance: Essential Insights for Tech and Security Professionals

Artificial intelligence (AI) is significantly impacting various business domains, including cybersecurity, with many organizations adopting generative AI for security purposes. As AI governance...

Government Under Fire for Rapid Facial Recognition Adoption

The UK government has faced criticism for the rapid rollout of facial recognition technology without establishing a comprehensive legal framework. Concerns have been raised about privacy...

AI Governance Start-Ups Surge Amid Growing Demand for Ethical Solutions

As the demand for AI technologies surges, so does the need for governance solutions to ensure they operate ethically and securely. The global AI governance industry is projected to grow significantly...

10-Year Ban on State AI Laws: Implications and Insights

The US House of Representatives has approved a budget package that includes a 10-year moratorium on enforcing state AI laws, which has sparked varying opinions among experts. Many argue that this...

AI in the Courts: Insights from 500 Cases

Courts around the world are already regulating artificial intelligence (AI) through various disputes involving automated decisions and data processing. The AI on Trial project highlights 500 cases...

Bridging the Gap in Responsible AI Implementation

Responsible AI is becoming a critical business necessity, especially as companies in the Asia-Pacific region face rising risks associated with emergent AI technologies. While nearly half of APAC...

Leading AI Governance: The Legal Imperative for Safe Innovation

In a recent interview, Brooke Johnson, Chief Legal Counsel at Ivanti, emphasizes the critical role of legal teams in AI governance, advocating for cross-functional collaboration to ensure safe and...

AI Regulations: Balancing Innovation and Safety

The recent passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act by the House of Representatives includes a provision that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence for ten years. This has...

Balancing Compliance and Innovation in Financial Services

Financial services companies face challenges in navigating rapidly evolving AI regulations that differ by jurisdiction, which can hinder innovation. The need for compliance is critical, as any misstep...