New York’s AI Legislation: Key Changes Employers Must Know

Q1 2025: New York’s Legislative Landscape for Artificial Intelligence

In the first quarter of 2025, New York State made significant strides in regulating artificial intelligence (AI), aligning itself with states like Colorado, Connecticut, New Jersey, and Texas. On January 8, 2025, critical bills aimed at overseeing the use of AI decision-making tools were introduced in both the New York Senate and State Assembly.

The NY AI Act

The proposed NY AI Act (Bill S011692) focuses on curbing algorithmic discrimination by establishing regulations around the deployment of certain AI systems, especially in employment contexts. This act empowers citizens with a private right of action, allowing them to sue technology companies for violations. Additionally, the New York AI Consumer Protection Act (Bill A007683) aims to modify general business laws to prevent AI algorithms from discriminating against protected classes.

Senator Kristen Gonzalez, who introduced the NY AI Act, emphasized that “a growing body of research shows that AI systems that are deployed without adequate testing, sufficient oversight, and robust guardrails can harm consumers and deny historically disadvantaged groups the full measure of their civil rights and liberties.” The act defines consumers broadly, encompassing all New York state residents, including employers and employees.

Key features of the NY AI Act include:

  • Acknowledgment of algorithmic discrimination as any unjustified differential treatment based on various protected characteristics.
  • Requirements for deployers—entities utilizing high-risk AI systems—to disclose their use of such systems to consumers five business days in advance.
  • Rights for consumers to opt out of automated decision-making processes and a promise of meaningful human review for consequential decisions.
  • Mandatory audits of high-risk AI systems before deployment and thereafter every 18 months.

The Protection Act

On the same day, Assembly Member Alex Bores introduced the Protection Act, which shares similar objectives with the NY AI Act but emphasizes preventing algorithmic discrimination across various protected classes. The act requires a bias and governance audit, where an independent auditor evaluates AI systems for their disparate impacts on employees based on protected characteristics.

Scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2027, the Protection Act mandates that deployers of high-risk AI decision systems:

  • Notify consumers of their use and provide a clear purpose for the AI’s decision-making role.
  • Implement and maintain a risk management program to mitigate known risks of algorithmic discrimination.

New York City Council Local Law Int. No. 1984-A

While these state-level acts are still pending, New York City employers must adhere to Local Law Int. No. 1984-A, effective July 5, 2023. This law aims to protect job candidates from discriminatory bias when automated employment decision-making tools (AEDTs) are utilized. It requires bias audits and advance notice to candidates regarding the use of AEDTs. The penalties for non-compliance can range from $500 to $1,500 per violation, with no cap on civil penalties.

Takeaways for Employers

As New York moves towards stricter regulations around AI, employers should proactively prepare for compliance with existing laws and upcoming legislation. Key recommendations include:

  • Assessing AI Systems: Identify any AI systems in use, particularly those involved in consequential employment decisions.
  • Reviewing Data Management Policies: Ensure compliance with data security protection standards.
  • Preparing for Audits: Familiarize with audit requirements and begin preparations for potential audits of high-risk AI systems.
  • Developing Internal Processes: Establish processes for employee disclosures regarding AI system violations.
  • Monitoring Legislation: Stay informed about proposed bills and continuously review federal guidance.

As the landscape for AI legislation evolves, employers must remain vigilant to navigate the complexities of compliance and the ethical implications of AI technologies.

More Insights

Protecting Confidentiality in the Age of AI Tools

The post discusses the importance of protecting confidential information when using AI tools, emphasizing the risks associated with sharing sensitive data. It highlights the need for users to be...

Colorado’s AI Law Faces Compliance Challenges After Update Efforts Fail

Colorado's pioneering law on artificial intelligence faced challenges as efforts to update it with Senate Bill 25-318 failed. As a result, employers must prepare to comply with the original law by...

AI Compliance Across Borders: Strategies for Success

The AI Governance & Strategy Summit will address the challenges organizations face in navigating the evolving landscape of AI regulation, focusing on major frameworks like the EU AI Act and the U.S...

Optimizing Federal AI Governance for Innovation

The post emphasizes the importance of effective AI governance in federal agencies to keep pace with rapidly advancing technology. It advocates for frameworks that are adaptive and risk-adjusted to...

Unlocking AI Excellence for Business Success

An AI Center of Excellence (CoE) is crucial for organizations looking to effectively adopt and optimize artificial intelligence technologies. It serves as an innovation hub that provides governance...

AI Regulation: Diverging Paths in Colorado and Utah

In recent developments, Colorado's legislature rejected amendments to its AI Act, while Utah enacted amendments that provide guidelines for mental health chatbots. These contrasting approaches...

Funding and Talent Shortages Threaten EU AI Act Enforcement

Enforcement of the EU AI Act is facing significant challenges due to a lack of funding and expertise, according to European Parliament digital policy advisor Kai Zenner. He highlighted that many...

Strengthening AI Governance in Higher Education

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly integrated into higher education, universities must adopt robust governance practices to ensure its responsible use. This involves addressing...

Balancing AI Innovation with Public Safety

Congressman Ted Lieu is committed to balancing AI innovation with safety, advocating for a regulatory framework that fosters technological advancement while ensuring public safety. He emphasizes the...