New York’s AI Legislation: Key Changes Employers Must Know

Q1 2025: New York’s Legislative Landscape for Artificial Intelligence

In the first quarter of 2025, New York State made significant strides in regulating artificial intelligence (AI), aligning itself with states like Colorado, Connecticut, New Jersey, and Texas. On January 8, 2025, critical bills aimed at overseeing the use of AI decision-making tools were introduced in both the New York Senate and State Assembly.

The NY AI Act

The proposed NY AI Act (Bill S011692) focuses on curbing algorithmic discrimination by establishing regulations around the deployment of certain AI systems, especially in employment contexts. This act empowers citizens with a private right of action, allowing them to sue technology companies for violations. Additionally, the New York AI Consumer Protection Act (Bill A007683) aims to modify general business laws to prevent AI algorithms from discriminating against protected classes.

Senator Kristen Gonzalez, who introduced the NY AI Act, emphasized that “a growing body of research shows that AI systems that are deployed without adequate testing, sufficient oversight, and robust guardrails can harm consumers and deny historically disadvantaged groups the full measure of their civil rights and liberties.” The act defines consumers broadly, encompassing all New York state residents, including employers and employees.

Key features of the NY AI Act include:

  • Acknowledgment of algorithmic discrimination as any unjustified differential treatment based on various protected characteristics.
  • Requirements for deployers—entities utilizing high-risk AI systems—to disclose their use of such systems to consumers five business days in advance.
  • Rights for consumers to opt out of automated decision-making processes and a promise of meaningful human review for consequential decisions.
  • Mandatory audits of high-risk AI systems before deployment and thereafter every 18 months.

The Protection Act

On the same day, Assembly Member Alex Bores introduced the Protection Act, which shares similar objectives with the NY AI Act but emphasizes preventing algorithmic discrimination across various protected classes. The act requires a bias and governance audit, where an independent auditor evaluates AI systems for their disparate impacts on employees based on protected characteristics.

Scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2027, the Protection Act mandates that deployers of high-risk AI decision systems:

  • Notify consumers of their use and provide a clear purpose for the AI’s decision-making role.
  • Implement and maintain a risk management program to mitigate known risks of algorithmic discrimination.

New York City Council Local Law Int. No. 1984-A

While these state-level acts are still pending, New York City employers must adhere to Local Law Int. No. 1984-A, effective July 5, 2023. This law aims to protect job candidates from discriminatory bias when automated employment decision-making tools (AEDTs) are utilized. It requires bias audits and advance notice to candidates regarding the use of AEDTs. The penalties for non-compliance can range from $500 to $1,500 per violation, with no cap on civil penalties.

Takeaways for Employers

As New York moves towards stricter regulations around AI, employers should proactively prepare for compliance with existing laws and upcoming legislation. Key recommendations include:

  • Assessing AI Systems: Identify any AI systems in use, particularly those involved in consequential employment decisions.
  • Reviewing Data Management Policies: Ensure compliance with data security protection standards.
  • Preparing for Audits: Familiarize with audit requirements and begin preparations for potential audits of high-risk AI systems.
  • Developing Internal Processes: Establish processes for employee disclosures regarding AI system violations.
  • Monitoring Legislation: Stay informed about proposed bills and continuously review federal guidance.

As the landscape for AI legislation evolves, employers must remain vigilant to navigate the complexities of compliance and the ethical implications of AI technologies.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...