New York’s AI Legislation: Key Changes Employers Must Know

Q1 2025: New York’s Legislative Landscape for Artificial Intelligence

In the first quarter of 2025, New York State made significant strides in regulating artificial intelligence (AI), aligning itself with states like Colorado, Connecticut, New Jersey, and Texas. On January 8, 2025, critical bills aimed at overseeing the use of AI decision-making tools were introduced in both the New York Senate and State Assembly.

The NY AI Act

The proposed NY AI Act (Bill S011692) focuses on curbing algorithmic discrimination by establishing regulations around the deployment of certain AI systems, especially in employment contexts. This act empowers citizens with a private right of action, allowing them to sue technology companies for violations. Additionally, the New York AI Consumer Protection Act (Bill A007683) aims to modify general business laws to prevent AI algorithms from discriminating against protected classes.

Senator Kristen Gonzalez, who introduced the NY AI Act, emphasized that “a growing body of research shows that AI systems that are deployed without adequate testing, sufficient oversight, and robust guardrails can harm consumers and deny historically disadvantaged groups the full measure of their civil rights and liberties.” The act defines consumers broadly, encompassing all New York state residents, including employers and employees.

Key features of the NY AI Act include:

  • Acknowledgment of algorithmic discrimination as any unjustified differential treatment based on various protected characteristics.
  • Requirements for deployers—entities utilizing high-risk AI systems—to disclose their use of such systems to consumers five business days in advance.
  • Rights for consumers to opt out of automated decision-making processes and a promise of meaningful human review for consequential decisions.
  • Mandatory audits of high-risk AI systems before deployment and thereafter every 18 months.

The Protection Act

On the same day, Assembly Member Alex Bores introduced the Protection Act, which shares similar objectives with the NY AI Act but emphasizes preventing algorithmic discrimination across various protected classes. The act requires a bias and governance audit, where an independent auditor evaluates AI systems for their disparate impacts on employees based on protected characteristics.

Scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2027, the Protection Act mandates that deployers of high-risk AI decision systems:

  • Notify consumers of their use and provide a clear purpose for the AI’s decision-making role.
  • Implement and maintain a risk management program to mitigate known risks of algorithmic discrimination.

New York City Council Local Law Int. No. 1984-A

While these state-level acts are still pending, New York City employers must adhere to Local Law Int. No. 1984-A, effective July 5, 2023. This law aims to protect job candidates from discriminatory bias when automated employment decision-making tools (AEDTs) are utilized. It requires bias audits and advance notice to candidates regarding the use of AEDTs. The penalties for non-compliance can range from $500 to $1,500 per violation, with no cap on civil penalties.

Takeaways for Employers

As New York moves towards stricter regulations around AI, employers should proactively prepare for compliance with existing laws and upcoming legislation. Key recommendations include:

  • Assessing AI Systems: Identify any AI systems in use, particularly those involved in consequential employment decisions.
  • Reviewing Data Management Policies: Ensure compliance with data security protection standards.
  • Preparing for Audits: Familiarize with audit requirements and begin preparations for potential audits of high-risk AI systems.
  • Developing Internal Processes: Establish processes for employee disclosures regarding AI system violations.
  • Monitoring Legislation: Stay informed about proposed bills and continuously review federal guidance.

As the landscape for AI legislation evolves, employers must remain vigilant to navigate the complexities of compliance and the ethical implications of AI technologies.

More Insights

AI Governance: Essential Insights for Tech and Security Professionals

Artificial intelligence (AI) is significantly impacting various business domains, including cybersecurity, with many organizations adopting generative AI for security purposes. As AI governance...

Government Under Fire for Rapid Facial Recognition Adoption

The UK government has faced criticism for the rapid rollout of facial recognition technology without establishing a comprehensive legal framework. Concerns have been raised about privacy...

AI Governance Start-Ups Surge Amid Growing Demand for Ethical Solutions

As the demand for AI technologies surges, so does the need for governance solutions to ensure they operate ethically and securely. The global AI governance industry is projected to grow significantly...

10-Year Ban on State AI Laws: Implications and Insights

The US House of Representatives has approved a budget package that includes a 10-year moratorium on enforcing state AI laws, which has sparked varying opinions among experts. Many argue that this...

AI in the Courts: Insights from 500 Cases

Courts around the world are already regulating artificial intelligence (AI) through various disputes involving automated decisions and data processing. The AI on Trial project highlights 500 cases...

Bridging the Gap in Responsible AI Implementation

Responsible AI is becoming a critical business necessity, especially as companies in the Asia-Pacific region face rising risks associated with emergent AI technologies. While nearly half of APAC...

Leading AI Governance: The Legal Imperative for Safe Innovation

In a recent interview, Brooke Johnson, Chief Legal Counsel at Ivanti, emphasizes the critical role of legal teams in AI governance, advocating for cross-functional collaboration to ensure safe and...

AI Regulations: Balancing Innovation and Safety

The recent passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act by the House of Representatives includes a provision that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence for ten years. This has...

Balancing Compliance and Innovation in Financial Services

Financial services companies face challenges in navigating rapidly evolving AI regulations that differ by jurisdiction, which can hinder innovation. The need for compliance is critical, as any misstep...