Key Recommendations for a National AI Action Plan: Clarity and Innovation

Key Recommendations for a U.S. AI Action Plan

In a significant move towards the development of a national Artificial Intelligence (AI) Action Plan, a prominent technology and intellectual property law firm has submitted crucial recommendations to the U.S. government. These proposals aim to foster innovation and ensure legal clarity in the rapidly evolving AI landscape.

Focus on Innovation and Legal Clarity

The law firm’s recommendations are designed to promote responsible AI development while addressing existing regulatory hurdles. By focusing on critical areas that support AI adoption across various industries, the proposals seek to minimize unnecessary regulatory barriers and maintain the U.S.’s competitive edge in global AI development.

Key Proposals Submitted

The following key proposals were submitted to enhance the regulatory framework surrounding AI:

  1. Safe Harbor Exemption for Data Transfers to Third-Party LLMs: To alleviate uncertainty regarding the legality of transferring customer data to third-party Large Language Models (LLMs), the firm advocates for a safe harbor exemption. This would enable businesses to engage with third-party LLMs without violating state-specific data privacy regulations.
  2. Revision of USPTO Policy on AI-Generated Inventions: The firm calls on the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to revise its policies to include protections for inventions discovered or created by AI systems. This change would encourage further innovation by recognizing the contributions of AI in the discovery process.
  3. Clarification of Copyright Protection for AI-Generated Works: Recommendations include revising U.S. Copyright Office policy to permit the registration of works generated by AI, as long as a human provides essential creative input. This would ensure that AI-generated works receive appropriate copyright protection.
  4. Tax Incentives for AI Data Center Investments: The firm proposes the inclusion of tax incentives in the AI Action Plan to encourage investment in AI data centers. These incentives would prioritize AI infrastructure, driving innovation and attracting investment into AI technologies.
  5. Review of Legacy Technology Laws: To facilitate AI adoption, existing laws created before the rise of AI technology should be reviewed. If found unnecessarily burdensome, these laws should be updated to meet the unique needs of AI development.
  6. Creation of a Federal AI Act: The firm advocates for a comprehensive federal Artificial Intelligence Act to provide consistent regulation of AI technologies, balancing innovation with responsibility and preventing conflicting state laws.
  7. Federal Agency to Coordinate AI Policy: Until the AI Act is established, a single federal executive agency should be appointed to coordinate federal and state policies on AI. This agency would ensure consistency and address regulatory complaints related to AI.

Conclusion

The law firm emphasizes that these recommendations aim to create a clear, efficient, and innovation-friendly regulatory environment for AI. The proposed changes are expected to accelerate AI adoption while ensuring protections for privacy, intellectual property, and investment. The United States has a pivotal opportunity to lead the world in AI development, and establishing a supportive legal framework is essential to unlock this potential.

Further engagement with policymakers and industry stakeholders is anticipated to refine these recommendations as the AI Action Plan takes shape.

More Insights

Responsible AI Workflows for Transforming UX Research

The article discusses how AI can transform UX research by improving efficiency and enabling deeper insights, while emphasizing the importance of human oversight to avoid biases and inaccuracies. It...

Revolutionizing Banking with Agentic AI

Agentic AI is transforming the banking sector by automating complex processes, enhancing customer experiences, and ensuring regulatory compliance. However, it also introduces challenges related to...

AI-Driven Compliance: The Future of Scalable Crypto Infrastructure

The explosive growth of the crypto industry has brought about numerous regulatory challenges, making AI-native compliance systems essential for scalability and operational efficiency. These systems...

ASEAN’s Evolving AI Governance Landscape

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is making progress toward AI governance through an innovation-friendly approach, but growing AI-related risks highlight the need for more binding...

EU AI Act vs. US AI Action Plan: A Risk Perspective

Dr. Cari Miller discusses the differences between the EU AI Act and the US AI Action Plan, highlighting that the EU framework is much more risk-aware and imposes binding obligations on high-risk AI...

The Hidden Risks of AI Integration in the Workplace

As organizations rush to adopt AI, many are ignoring the critical risks involved, such as compliance and oversight issues. Without proper governance and human management, AI can quickly become a...

Investing in AI Safety: Capitalizing on the Future of Responsible Innovation

The AI safety collaboration imperative is becoming essential as the artificial intelligence revolution reshapes industries and daily life. Investors are encouraged to capitalize on this opportunity by...

AI Innovations in Modern Policing

Law enforcement agencies are increasingly leveraging artificial intelligence to enhance their operations, particularly in predictive policing. The integration of technology offers immense potential...

Kenya’s Pivotal Role in UN’s Groundbreaking AI Governance Agreement

Kenya has achieved a significant diplomatic success by leading the establishment of two landmark institutions for governing artificial intelligence (AI) at the United Nations. The Independent...