Insurance Commissioners Raise Concerns Over AI Regulation Bill

AI Update: Challenges to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBA”), which proposes a 10-year freeze on new state-level artificial intelligence regulations while suspending the enforcement of existing ones, is currently facing challenges from several state insurance commissioners. Their concerns center around the bill’s broad definition of AI, which they argue is too expansive.

Concerns Over the Definition of AI

Insurance commissioners have raised alarms that the language within the OBBA could extend beyond machine learning systems to encompass common data tools and software that are regularly utilized by insurers. If the bill is enacted in its current form, this could potentially stifle regulators’ abilities to monitor and address emerging issues associated with technologies that do not strictly fall under the category of AI.

The Impact on Regulatory Practices

Furthermore, the commissioners contend that the moratorium outlined in the bill would interfere with recognized oversight practices that support fairness and transparency in insurance pricing and underwriting. This interference could jeopardize compliance with nondiscrimination standards.

As the use of predictive analytics becomes increasingly prevalent in the industry, restricting oversight could erode vital safeguards. The inability to adjust regulatory frameworks in response to the growing influence of AI in insurance may hinder state-level supervision and consumer protection efforts.

Potential Disruptions to the Insurance Regulatory System

A letter from the commissioners warned that the proposed 10-year freeze could disrupt the established state-based insurance regulatory system. This disruption might result in uncertainty for insurers, delay critical consumer protection initiatives, and complicate business decisions due to a lack of clarity surrounding compliance and enforcement.

Ultimately, the leadership of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) has urged lawmakers to either remove or amend the AI provision in the proposed bill. They also suggested that the Senate should consider exempting the insurance sector if the provision moves forward.

Legal Implications

Moreover, the commissioners indicated that if enacted, the provision is likely to face challenges under the McCarran-Ferguson Act, which prohibits federal laws from overriding state insurance regulations. They emphasized that until a legal ruling is made, insurers will operate under uncertain conditions, facing unclear regulatory expectations and potential exposure to litigation.

Legislative Progress

The OBBA successfully passed the House of Representatives on May 22, 2025, with a narrow party-line vote of 215–214–1. The ongoing debate surrounding this bill highlights the complexities of regulating rapidly evolving technologies like AI within the insurance industry.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...