Insurance Commissioners Raise Concerns Over AI Regulation Bill

AI Update: Challenges to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBA”), which proposes a 10-year freeze on new state-level artificial intelligence regulations while suspending the enforcement of existing ones, is currently facing challenges from several state insurance commissioners. Their concerns center around the bill’s broad definition of AI, which they argue is too expansive.

Concerns Over the Definition of AI

Insurance commissioners have raised alarms that the language within the OBBA could extend beyond machine learning systems to encompass common data tools and software that are regularly utilized by insurers. If the bill is enacted in its current form, this could potentially stifle regulators’ abilities to monitor and address emerging issues associated with technologies that do not strictly fall under the category of AI.

The Impact on Regulatory Practices

Furthermore, the commissioners contend that the moratorium outlined in the bill would interfere with recognized oversight practices that support fairness and transparency in insurance pricing and underwriting. This interference could jeopardize compliance with nondiscrimination standards.

As the use of predictive analytics becomes increasingly prevalent in the industry, restricting oversight could erode vital safeguards. The inability to adjust regulatory frameworks in response to the growing influence of AI in insurance may hinder state-level supervision and consumer protection efforts.

Potential Disruptions to the Insurance Regulatory System

A letter from the commissioners warned that the proposed 10-year freeze could disrupt the established state-based insurance regulatory system. This disruption might result in uncertainty for insurers, delay critical consumer protection initiatives, and complicate business decisions due to a lack of clarity surrounding compliance and enforcement.

Ultimately, the leadership of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) has urged lawmakers to either remove or amend the AI provision in the proposed bill. They also suggested that the Senate should consider exempting the insurance sector if the provision moves forward.

Legal Implications

Moreover, the commissioners indicated that if enacted, the provision is likely to face challenges under the McCarran-Ferguson Act, which prohibits federal laws from overriding state insurance regulations. They emphasized that until a legal ruling is made, insurers will operate under uncertain conditions, facing unclear regulatory expectations and potential exposure to litigation.

Legislative Progress

The OBBA successfully passed the House of Representatives on May 22, 2025, with a narrow party-line vote of 215–214–1. The ongoing debate surrounding this bill highlights the complexities of regulating rapidly evolving technologies like AI within the insurance industry.

More Insights

US Rejects UN’s Call for Global AI Governance Framework

U.S. officials rejected the establishment of a global AI governance framework at the United Nations General Assembly, despite broad support from many nations, including China. Michael Kratsios of the...

Agentic AI: Managing the Risks of Autonomous Systems

As companies increasingly adopt agentic AI systems for autonomous decision-making, they face the emerging challenge of agentic AI sprawl, which can lead to security vulnerabilities and operational...

AI as a New Opinion Gatekeeper: Addressing Hidden Biases

As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly integrated into sectors like healthcare and finance, a new study highlights the potential for subtle biases in AI systems to distort public...

AI Accountability: A New Era of Regulation and Compliance

The burgeoning world of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is at a critical juncture as regulatory actions signal a new era of accountability and ethical deployment. Recent events highlight the shift...

Choosing Effective AI Governance Tools for Safer Adoption

As generative AI continues to evolve, so do the associated risks, making AI governance tools essential for managing these challenges. This initiative, in collaboration with Tokio Marine Group, aims to...

UN Initiatives for Trustworthy AI Governance

The United Nations is working to influence global policy on artificial intelligence by establishing an expert panel to develop standards for "safe, secure and trustworthy" AI. This initiative aims to...

Data-Driven Governance: Shaping AI Regulation in Singapore

The conversation between Thomas Roehm from SAS and Frankie Phua from United Overseas Bank at the SAS Innovate On Tour in Singapore explores how data-driven regulation can effectively govern rapidly...

Preparing SMEs for EU AI Compliance Challenges

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) must navigate the complexities of the EU AI Act, which categorizes many AI applications as "high-risk" and imposes strict compliance requirements. To adapt...

Draft Guidance on Reporting Serious Incidents Under the EU AI Act

On September 26, 2025, the European Commission published draft guidance on serious incident reporting requirements for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act. Organizations developing or deploying...