Insurance Commissioners Raise Concerns Over AI Regulation Bill

AI Update: Challenges to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBA”), which proposes a 10-year freeze on new state-level artificial intelligence regulations while suspending the enforcement of existing ones, is currently facing challenges from several state insurance commissioners. Their concerns center around the bill’s broad definition of AI, which they argue is too expansive.

Concerns Over the Definition of AI

Insurance commissioners have raised alarms that the language within the OBBA could extend beyond machine learning systems to encompass common data tools and software that are regularly utilized by insurers. If the bill is enacted in its current form, this could potentially stifle regulators’ abilities to monitor and address emerging issues associated with technologies that do not strictly fall under the category of AI.

The Impact on Regulatory Practices

Furthermore, the commissioners contend that the moratorium outlined in the bill would interfere with recognized oversight practices that support fairness and transparency in insurance pricing and underwriting. This interference could jeopardize compliance with nondiscrimination standards.

As the use of predictive analytics becomes increasingly prevalent in the industry, restricting oversight could erode vital safeguards. The inability to adjust regulatory frameworks in response to the growing influence of AI in insurance may hinder state-level supervision and consumer protection efforts.

Potential Disruptions to the Insurance Regulatory System

A letter from the commissioners warned that the proposed 10-year freeze could disrupt the established state-based insurance regulatory system. This disruption might result in uncertainty for insurers, delay critical consumer protection initiatives, and complicate business decisions due to a lack of clarity surrounding compliance and enforcement.

Ultimately, the leadership of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) has urged lawmakers to either remove or amend the AI provision in the proposed bill. They also suggested that the Senate should consider exempting the insurance sector if the provision moves forward.

Legal Implications

Moreover, the commissioners indicated that if enacted, the provision is likely to face challenges under the McCarran-Ferguson Act, which prohibits federal laws from overriding state insurance regulations. They emphasized that until a legal ruling is made, insurers will operate under uncertain conditions, facing unclear regulatory expectations and potential exposure to litigation.

Legislative Progress

The OBBA successfully passed the House of Representatives on May 22, 2025, with a narrow party-line vote of 215–214–1. The ongoing debate surrounding this bill highlights the complexities of regulating rapidly evolving technologies like AI within the insurance industry.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...