Harnessing AI for Sustainable Climate Solutions

Navigating Responsible AI for Climate Action

The United Nations’ 1987 Brundtland Report defined sustainable development as “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.” This definition emphasizes the importance of striking a balance between current demands and the protection of future resources, particularly in the era of artificial intelligence (AI).

AI today presents a clear dichotomy: while it facilitates efficiency and innovative solutions to pressing environmental and societal challenges, it also imposes increased resource demands that are approaching the energy consumption needs of entire countries.

The Role of AI in Sustainable Development

As AI becomes more prevalent across industries and regions, numerous environmentally focused use cases have emerged. The AI for Good movement, supported by institutions like the United Nations, illustrates how AI can help achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), many of which address climate change, such as Goal 13. The European Parliament’s Think Tank suggests that AI could potentially reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by 1.5–4% by 2030, aiding in the realization of Goal 13.

However, the environmental implications of AI necessitate a significant responsibility to mitigate its impacts. The high energy consumption required to train and maintain sophisticated machine learning models is one of the many environmental costs associated with AI systems.

AI’s Environmental Footprint

AI’s environmental footprint can be assessed through several key factors:

  1. Energy Consumption: AI models require substantial processing power due to their complexity. This leads to significant energy consumption, especially during the training phase, which can be lengthy for more intricate models. The choice of model type can greatly influence an AI system’s overall environmental impact. For instance, deep learning, natural language processing (NLP), and generative AI (GenAI) models typically demand more energy than simpler categorization models.
  2. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions: The substantial energy needed to operate AI systems—especially from non-renewable power sources—often triggers significant greenhouse gas emissions.
  3. Water Consumption: Large data centers, essential for training and deploying advanced AI models, require water-intensive cooling systems to prevent overheating. This demand can exacerbate water scarcity in vulnerable regions.
  4. Hardware and E-Waste: The production and disposal of servers, GPUs, and other specialized technology contribute to environmental degradation through resource extraction, manufacturing emissions, and electronic waste, which pollutes ecosystems.

A Sustainable Path Forward

One promising avenue for sustainability involves deploying large AI models on edge devices like wearables, smart speakers, and smartphones. These devices, limited in processing power, cannot run complex models with billions of parameters, thus reducing operational costs and energy consumption associated with cloud computing. AI models on edge devices tend to be more energy-efficient compared to their cloud-based counterparts, mitigating their environmental impact.

End users also face environmental costs from the continuous operation of GenAI tools. For example, generating images typically consumes more energy than producing text, and large language models inherently require more energy than smaller models designed for specific tasks.

To foster a sustainable AI ecosystem, ongoing research at the intersection of AI and sustainability is essential. Companies must be deliberate about the how, why, and when of GenAI applications.

Mobilizing for Climate Action

Recent climate events—including unprecedented heatwaves, devastating wildfires, and catastrophic floods—underscore the urgency of addressing climate emergencies. The Responsible AI Working Group (RAI WG) of the Global Partnership on AI (GPAI) has established a Committee on Climate Action and Biodiversity Preservation to explore how AI can support climate action.

Given that AI is a versatile tool, it must be developed responsibly across all applications. Key principles include fairness, accountability, safety, privacy, security, and robustness, which are critical for effective policy recommendations.

Data quality also plays a crucial role in responsible AI. The accuracy, timeliness, and completeness of datasets significantly affect the reliability and performance of AI systems. Promoting accountability and transparency is vital to build trust and address ethical concerns surrounding AI technology.

AI is integral to integrating renewable energy (RE) into the energy sector. Variable renewable energy (VRE) sources like solar and wind present unpredictable demand and supply patterns compared to traditional energy networks. However, AI can accurately predict these patterns, facilitating smoother transitions to renewable energy and progressively lowering emissions.

Recommendations for Governments

To mitigate AI’s adverse effects on climate, governments should:

  • Refrain from directly supporting applications that conflict with climate objectives.
  • Prioritize climate change when promoting the development of AI-enabled technologies.
  • Ensure that reporting and carbon pricing regulations adequately reflect cloud computing.
  • Only procure AI and computing services from companies committed to achieving net-zero emissions.

In conclusion, harnessing AI’s potential to combat climate change and enhance global collaboration requires a coordinated approach focused on ethics, transparency, and accountability. By adhering to ethical standards and promoting responsible AI practices, stakeholders can effectively address climate challenges using the transformative power of AI.

More Insights

AI Governance: Essential Insights for Tech and Security Professionals

Artificial intelligence (AI) is significantly impacting various business domains, including cybersecurity, with many organizations adopting generative AI for security purposes. As AI governance...

Government Under Fire for Rapid Facial Recognition Adoption

The UK government has faced criticism for the rapid rollout of facial recognition technology without establishing a comprehensive legal framework. Concerns have been raised about privacy...

AI Governance Start-Ups Surge Amid Growing Demand for Ethical Solutions

As the demand for AI technologies surges, so does the need for governance solutions to ensure they operate ethically and securely. The global AI governance industry is projected to grow significantly...

10-Year Ban on State AI Laws: Implications and Insights

The US House of Representatives has approved a budget package that includes a 10-year moratorium on enforcing state AI laws, which has sparked varying opinions among experts. Many argue that this...

AI in the Courts: Insights from 500 Cases

Courts around the world are already regulating artificial intelligence (AI) through various disputes involving automated decisions and data processing. The AI on Trial project highlights 500 cases...

Bridging the Gap in Responsible AI Implementation

Responsible AI is becoming a critical business necessity, especially as companies in the Asia-Pacific region face rising risks associated with emergent AI technologies. While nearly half of APAC...

Leading AI Governance: The Legal Imperative for Safe Innovation

In a recent interview, Brooke Johnson, Chief Legal Counsel at Ivanti, emphasizes the critical role of legal teams in AI governance, advocating for cross-functional collaboration to ensure safe and...

AI Regulations: Balancing Innovation and Safety

The recent passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act by the House of Representatives includes a provision that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence for ten years. This has...

Balancing Compliance and Innovation in Financial Services

Financial services companies face challenges in navigating rapidly evolving AI regulations that differ by jurisdiction, which can hinder innovation. The need for compliance is critical, as any misstep...