Harnessing AI for Sustainable Climate Solutions

Navigating Responsible AI for Climate Action

The United Nations’ 1987 Brundtland Report defined sustainable development as “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.” This definition emphasizes the importance of striking a balance between current demands and the protection of future resources, particularly in the era of artificial intelligence (AI).

AI today presents a clear dichotomy: while it facilitates efficiency and innovative solutions to pressing environmental and societal challenges, it also imposes increased resource demands that are approaching the energy consumption needs of entire countries.

The Role of AI in Sustainable Development

As AI becomes more prevalent across industries and regions, numerous environmentally focused use cases have emerged. The AI for Good movement, supported by institutions like the United Nations, illustrates how AI can help achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), many of which address climate change, such as Goal 13. The European Parliament’s Think Tank suggests that AI could potentially reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by 1.5–4% by 2030, aiding in the realization of Goal 13.

However, the environmental implications of AI necessitate a significant responsibility to mitigate its impacts. The high energy consumption required to train and maintain sophisticated machine learning models is one of the many environmental costs associated with AI systems.

AI’s Environmental Footprint

AI’s environmental footprint can be assessed through several key factors:

  1. Energy Consumption: AI models require substantial processing power due to their complexity. This leads to significant energy consumption, especially during the training phase, which can be lengthy for more intricate models. The choice of model type can greatly influence an AI system’s overall environmental impact. For instance, deep learning, natural language processing (NLP), and generative AI (GenAI) models typically demand more energy than simpler categorization models.
  2. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions: The substantial energy needed to operate AI systems—especially from non-renewable power sources—often triggers significant greenhouse gas emissions.
  3. Water Consumption: Large data centers, essential for training and deploying advanced AI models, require water-intensive cooling systems to prevent overheating. This demand can exacerbate water scarcity in vulnerable regions.
  4. Hardware and E-Waste: The production and disposal of servers, GPUs, and other specialized technology contribute to environmental degradation through resource extraction, manufacturing emissions, and electronic waste, which pollutes ecosystems.

A Sustainable Path Forward

One promising avenue for sustainability involves deploying large AI models on edge devices like wearables, smart speakers, and smartphones. These devices, limited in processing power, cannot run complex models with billions of parameters, thus reducing operational costs and energy consumption associated with cloud computing. AI models on edge devices tend to be more energy-efficient compared to their cloud-based counterparts, mitigating their environmental impact.

End users also face environmental costs from the continuous operation of GenAI tools. For example, generating images typically consumes more energy than producing text, and large language models inherently require more energy than smaller models designed for specific tasks.

To foster a sustainable AI ecosystem, ongoing research at the intersection of AI and sustainability is essential. Companies must be deliberate about the how, why, and when of GenAI applications.

Mobilizing for Climate Action

Recent climate events—including unprecedented heatwaves, devastating wildfires, and catastrophic floods—underscore the urgency of addressing climate emergencies. The Responsible AI Working Group (RAI WG) of the Global Partnership on AI (GPAI) has established a Committee on Climate Action and Biodiversity Preservation to explore how AI can support climate action.

Given that AI is a versatile tool, it must be developed responsibly across all applications. Key principles include fairness, accountability, safety, privacy, security, and robustness, which are critical for effective policy recommendations.

Data quality also plays a crucial role in responsible AI. The accuracy, timeliness, and completeness of datasets significantly affect the reliability and performance of AI systems. Promoting accountability and transparency is vital to build trust and address ethical concerns surrounding AI technology.

AI is integral to integrating renewable energy (RE) into the energy sector. Variable renewable energy (VRE) sources like solar and wind present unpredictable demand and supply patterns compared to traditional energy networks. However, AI can accurately predict these patterns, facilitating smoother transitions to renewable energy and progressively lowering emissions.

Recommendations for Governments

To mitigate AI’s adverse effects on climate, governments should:

  • Refrain from directly supporting applications that conflict with climate objectives.
  • Prioritize climate change when promoting the development of AI-enabled technologies.
  • Ensure that reporting and carbon pricing regulations adequately reflect cloud computing.
  • Only procure AI and computing services from companies committed to achieving net-zero emissions.

In conclusion, harnessing AI’s potential to combat climate change and enhance global collaboration requires a coordinated approach focused on ethics, transparency, and accountability. By adhering to ethical standards and promoting responsible AI practices, stakeholders can effectively address climate challenges using the transformative power of AI.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...