EU’s AI Code of Practice Set for Late 2025 Release

Code of Practice for AI Regulations: A Potential Delay Until 2025

The European Commission has indicated that a Code of Practice aimed at assisting companies in adhering to the European Union’s artificial intelligence (AI) regulations may not be released until the end of 2025. This announcement comes amidst concerns from various stakeholders regarding the implementation timeline of the EU’s landmark Artificial Intelligence Act.

Background on the AI Act

The AI Act is a significant legislative framework designed to establish clear guidelines for the development and deployment of AI technologies within the EU. The Act aims to create a harmonized set of risk-based rules that ensure the safety and accountability of AI systems in the market.

Concerns Over Implementation Delays

Several prominent organizations, including Alphabet’s Google and Meta Platforms, alongside European companies such as Mistral and ASML, have advocated for a delay in the rollout of the AI regulations. Their concerns primarily focus on the absence of a comprehensive Code of Practice, which is crucial for guiding companies in compliance efforts.

Original Timeline and Current Updates

Initially, the publication of the Code of Practice for large language models (GPAI), including systems like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, was scheduled for May 2, 2025. However, a spokesperson from the European Commission has stated that discussions are ongoing regarding the timing of the Code’s implementation, with the end of 2025 now being considered as a possible release date.

Voluntary Compliance and Legal Implications

It is important to note that while signing up for the Code will be voluntary, companies that choose not to participate may miss out on the legal certainty that comes with being a signatory. This aspect could significantly impact large tech firms that have expressed hesitations regarding compliance.

Commitment to AI Safety

Despite the push for delays, the European Commission has reaffirmed its commitment to the foundational goals of the AI Act, emphasizing the necessity of establishing harmonized rules across the EU and ensuring the safety of AI systems in the market. The ongoing discussions reflect a balancing act between innovation, compliance, and safety in the rapidly evolving AI landscape.

As the landscape of AI regulations continues to evolve, stakeholders will be closely monitoring the developments concerning the Code of Practice and its implications for the industry.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...