EU Lawmakers Oppose Voluntary AI Act Compliance Rules
The European Commission is facing significant opposition from EU lawmakers regarding its proposal to make more requirements of the AI Act voluntary. This move is seen as potentially beneficial to large AI developers such as Google and OpenAI, who would experience a decrease in compliance burdens.
Key Takeaways
- The European Commission is reportedly considering making parts of the AI Act voluntary.
- This proposal could favor major AI developers.
- However, it is encountering pushback from the EU Parliament.
As the European Commission explores deregulation as a means to enhance AI investment, the intention to dilute the requirements of the landmark AI Act has sparked intense debate. Lawmakers from the EU Parliament are firmly opposing this proposal, emphasizing the importance of maintaining stringent standards in AI development.
Deregulation on the Agenda
Since the AI Act was enacted in 2024, the political landscape has shifted dramatically. Originally designed with safety and responsibility in mind, the call for a more laissez-faire approach arises from concerns regarding European competitiveness. Proponents of deregulation argue that easing restrictions could foster innovation and economic growth.
In a significant development, the Commission removed a proposed AI liability directive from its 2025 work program, citing “no foreseeable agreement” on the legislation. This decision aligns with the Commission’s broader agenda to cut bureaucratic red tape and streamline regulations impacting businesses.
U.S. Pressure
The EU’s push for deregulation is not occurring in isolation; it is influenced by external pressures, notably from the U.S. administration. A recent White House memorandum explicitly referenced the EU’s Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act, indicating a growing apprehension that the AI Act could pose a threat to American businesses.
In this geopolitical context, U.S. tech giants like Google and OpenAI stand to gain significantly from a relaxation of the AI Act. If compliance requirements are made voluntary, these companies could operate under a much lighter regulatory framework.
MEPs Warn Against Weakening the AI Act
Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) who were instrumental in negotiating the AI Act have voiced strong objections to the Commission’s plans. They argue that weakening the Act would be “dangerous” and “undemocratic.” A letter drafted by these MEPs warns that failing to hold AI developers to high standards of safety and security could have severe repercussions for Europe’s economy and democracy.
The hierarchy of EU lawmaking complicates the process, as MEPs have limited power to block the Commission’s proposed changes. However, member states retain significant influence and may push back against deregulation efforts.
Notably, the letter opposing the weakening of the AI Act garnered support from Carme Artigas, a key negotiator on behalf of member states during the Act’s drafting. This coalition may provide a counterbalance to the Commission’s efforts, particularly as countries like France have historically resisted stricter AI regulations.
As the debate continues, the future of the AI Act remains uncertain, with potential implications for the landscape of AI development and regulation in Europe.
