EU Delays AI Compliance Guidance to 2025

EU’s Potential Delay in AI Compliance Guidance

The European Commission has announced that crucial guidance to assist companies in complying with the European Union’s regulations on artificial intelligence (AI) may be postponed until the end of 2025. This development signifies a delay of six months from the previously established timeline.

Implications of the Delay

A spokesperson for the European Commission stated, “The European AI Board is discussing the timing to implement the Code of Practice, with the end of 2025 being considered.” This guidance is particularly relevant for general-purpose AI (GPAI), which encompasses widely used technologies such as large language models, including OpenAI’s ChatGPT and similar innovations from tech giants like Google and Mistral.

The Commission had initially set a deadline of May 2 for the introduction of the Code of Practice. However, this recent delay raises concerns for thousands of companies that are working to align their AI systems with the EU’s groundbreaking regulations on artificial intelligence.

Impact on Companies

The postponement of the compliance guidance could have far-reaching effects on numerous businesses that rely on AI technologies. Companies must adapt their systems to meet the stringent standards set forth by the EU, and any delays in guidance could hinder their ability to comply effectively. This situation underscores the importance of clear and timely regulations in the rapidly evolving field of AI.

Conclusion

This potential delay in the EU’s AI compliance guidance not only affects the timeline for regulatory alignment but also highlights the ongoing conversation about the governance of AI technologies. As businesses await further information, the need for precise regulations and support from governing bodies remains critical in ensuring the responsible development and deployment of AI systems.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...