EU Bans AI Systems with Unacceptable Risks

The EC Updates AI Act: Banning Systems That Pose ‘Unacceptable Risk’

The European Commission (EC) has made significant updates to the Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), which was originally introduced in 2023 to provide a comprehensive regulatory framework for the development and application of AI technologies. These updates aim to strengthen the safety and rights of individuals within the European Union (EU) by banning AI systems that are categorized as posing an unacceptable risk.

Definition of Risk Levels

The AI Act outlines four distinct levels of risk associated with AI systems:

  • Unacceptable risk
  • High risk
  • Limited risk
  • Minimal risk

According to the EC, systems classified as posing an unacceptable risk are now prohibited in the EU. These systems are identified as a clear threat to the safety, rights, and livelihoods of individuals. Examples include:

  • Social scoring systems that assess individuals based on their behavior.
  • Facial recognition technologies using internet or CCTV material for database creation.
  • AI applications that manipulate, deceive, or exploit vulnerabilities.

Monitoring High-Risk AI Systems

While systems identified as high risk are not outright banned, they will be subject to stringent monitoring by the EC. These applications, which are developed in good faith but have the potential to cause significant harm, include:

  • AI components in critical infrastructure whose failure could threaten public safety, such as in transportation.
  • AI tools in educational settings that may impact access to education, such as exam scoring.
  • AI safety components in products, including robot-assisted surgeries.
  • AI applications in law enforcement that could infringe on fundamental rights, like evidence evaluation.

Before any high-risk AI system can enter the market, it must undergo a conformity assessment and comply with all stipulations of the AI Act. Additionally, these systems must be registered in a dedicated database and bear the Conformité Européene (CE) Mark, a certification that has governed products within the European Economic Area (EEA) since 1985.

Enforcement and Compliance

The enforcement of the AI Act will be overseen by national regulators. Companies found to be non-compliant with the regulations will face substantial financial penalties, with fines reaching up to €35 million or more, depending on global annual revenue. Furthermore, organizations engaged in prohibited AI practices may be banned from operating within the EU altogether.

Implications for AI Developers

Despite the stringent regulations, most AI developers within the EU may not face these challenges, as the majority of AI systems currently in use are categorized as presenting minimal or no risk. The EC emphasizes that while many AI systems offer valuable solutions to societal challenges, it is crucial to address the risks associated with certain AI technologies to prevent undesirable outcomes.

In summary, the recent updates to the AI Act reflect the EU’s commitment to ensuring that AI technologies are developed and applied in a manner that safeguards the rights and safety of its citizens.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...