EU AI Act: Transforming the Future of iGaming

Will the EU AI Act Reshape iGaming?

Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing the iGaming sector, with the European Union AI Act promising to redefine how gaming operators utilize and manage AI technologies. The imminent rollout of this legislation presents both challenges and opportunities for the industry.

The AI Act and Gaming’s Future

The AI Act is heralded as a transformative piece of legislation within Europe, establishing a harmonized framework that governs AI across various sectors, including gaming. Gaming companies employ AI for numerous purposes, such as facial recognition and behavioral data analytics. As Dr. Cachia highlights, the use of certain AI tools necessitates a risk assessment by gaming operators. High-risk AI systems, especially those involving facial biometrics, are subject to stringent scrutiny due to the potential for fraudulent practices.

When implementing facial recognition technologies, operators must ensure that customers are informed and provide consent for AI usage. Enhanced compliance measures are required for AI applications that carry higher risks, including adherence to a universal code of practice currently being developed alongside the AI Act.

Compliance Roadmaps for High-Risk AI

To prepare for the phased implementation of the AI Act, gaming companies are advised to draft internal codes of practice for AI usage, using models issued by the European Commission as a foundation. Conducting an inventory of AI applications to classify their risk levels is equally critical. For instance, AI utilized for internal tasks, such as drafting contracts, may be categorized as low risk, whereas facial recognition falls into the high-risk category and requires an enhanced risk assessment.

Proactive interest from regulators is already evident, with authorities like Malta’s Gaming Authority conducting surveys to assess the AI technologies employed by industry license holders. This shift indicates a move towards immediate action, highlighting the necessity for operators to align their AI development strategies with legal requirements without delay.

Balancing Regulation with Innovation

The EU’s AI governance structure consists of various bodies aimed at regulating and promoting the responsible advancement of AI. The establishment of an AI regulatory sandbox provides a light-touch regulatory regime for startups, allowing them to offer AI as a service while ensuring player protection and trust.

The EU’s AI office will facilitate ongoing dialogue among stakeholders, including AI providers and gaming operators. Industry participants are encouraged to expedite their preparations, even though full implementation may take five to ten years. Dr. Cachia advises that companies begin drafting internal codes for AI usage as soon as possible.

Conclusion

The EU AI Act is set to fundamentally shape the use of high-risk AI within the iGaming industry through clear compliance obligations and governance mechanisms. Operators should take immediate action to inventory their AI tools, implement comprehensive risk assessments, and develop codes of practice focused on transparency and responsible gaming principles.

More Insights

Revolutionizing Drone Regulations: The EU AI Act Explained

The EU AI Act represents a significant regulatory framework that aims to address the challenges posed by artificial intelligence technologies in various sectors, including the burgeoning field of...

Embracing Responsible AI to Mitigate Legal Risks

Businesses must prioritize responsible AI as a frontline defense against legal, financial, and reputational risks, particularly in understanding data lineage. Ignoring these responsibilities could...

AI Governance: Addressing the Shadow IT Challenge

AI tools are rapidly transforming workplace operations, but much of their adoption is happening without proper oversight, leading to the rise of shadow AI as a security concern. Organizations need to...

EU Delays AI Act Implementation to 2027 Amid Industry Pressure

The EU plans to delay the enforcement of high-risk duties in the AI Act until late 2027, allowing companies more time to comply with the regulations. However, this move has drawn criticism from rights...

White House Challenges GAIN AI Act Amid Nvidia Export Controversy

The White House is pushing back against the bipartisan GAIN AI Act, which aims to prioritize U.S. companies in acquiring advanced AI chips. This resistance reflects a strategic decision to maintain...

Experts Warn of EU AI Act’s Impact on Medtech Innovation

Experts at the 2025 European Digital Technology and Software conference expressed concerns that the EU AI Act could hinder the launch of new medtech products in the European market. They emphasized...

Ethical AI: Transforming Compliance into Innovation

Enterprises are racing to innovate with artificial intelligence, often without the proper compliance measures in place. By embedding privacy and ethics into the development lifecycle, organizations...

AI Hiring Compliance Risks Uncovered

Artificial intelligence is reshaping recruitment, with the percentage of HR leaders using generative AI increasing from 19% to 61% between 2023 and 2025. However, this efficiency comes with legal...

AI in Australian Government: Balancing Innovation and Security Risks

The Australian government is considering using AI to draft sensitive cabinet submissions as part of a broader strategy to implement AI across the public service. While some public servants report...