EU AI Act Enforces Prohibited Practices and Mandates AI Literacy

EU AI Act: Prohibited AI Ban and AI Literacy Rules Now in Force

The EU AI Act has officially come into effect, marking a significant milestone in the regulation of artificial intelligence within the European Union. With the passing of the first major compliance deadline on February 2, 2025, regulators have implemented a ban on certain high-risk AI applications. Companies developing or deploying AI systems must now ensure that their staff possesses a sufficient level of AI literacy.

Prohibited AI Practices

According to Article 5 of the EU AI Act, specific AI applications that pose unacceptable risks to fundamental rights and core Union values are banned. The law prohibits the sale, deployment, or use of any AI system that:

  • Uses subliminal, manipulative, or deceptive techniques that distort a person’s behavior or impair their decision-making;
  • Exploits the vulnerabilities of individuals based on age, disability, or socio-economic status;
  • Evaluates individuals based on their social behavior or personality traits, leading to unfair treatment;
  • Predicts the risk of criminal offenses based solely on profiling;
  • Creates facial recognition databases through untargeted scraping of facial images;
  • Infers emotions in individuals at work or in educational settings;
  • Uses biometric categorization to infer sensitive demographic characteristics;
  • Collects “real-time” biometric data in public spaces for law enforcement purposes.

While there is an exemption for the use of AI systems designed to infer emotions in the workplace for medical or safety purposes, this reflects a critical balance between AI innovation and the protection of consumer rights.

Guidance and Clarifications

The European Commission has released Guidelines that clarify the scope of the ban and provide practical examples to aid understanding of the Act’s applicability. Notably, the term ‘placing on the market’ refers to any availability of an AI system, regardless of the means of supply, including APIs and cloud services.

The ‘putting into service’ aspect covers the supply of AI systems for first use, while ‘use’ encompasses the deployment of an AI system throughout its lifecycle. Importantly, misuse of an AI system falls under the prohibited practices as well.

For instance, manipulative practices by AI systems are prohibited if they fulfill certain conditions: they must constitute placing on the market, involve deceptive techniques, materially distort behavior, and likely cause significant harm to the individual.

AI Literacy Requirements

Effective February 2, 2025, the AI literacy provisions under Article 4 took effect, mandating that all providers and deployers of AI systems ensure their personnel possess a sufficient level of AI literacy. This encompasses the necessary skills, knowledge, and understanding required to make informed decisions regarding AI deployment.

The European Artificial Intelligence Office has established a Living Repository of AI Literacy Practices to promote awareness and education regarding AI literacy.

Next Steps for Organizations

Organizations must first assess whether they are using any AI applications prohibited under Article 5. If so, they should engage stakeholders to phase out these AI systems and discontinue their use. Establishing procedures for identifying future AI initiatives that may intersect with the ban is advisable, alongside implementing employee training to ensure compliance across teams.

Even if specific prohibitions do not apply, the AI literacy requirements span a broader range of AI activities, offering an opportunity to develop comprehensive AI governance, training programs, and safeguards against potential misuse.

This regulatory framework aims to ensure that while AI technology advances, it does so in a way that prioritizes ethical considerations and consumer protection.

More Insights

AI Regulations: Comparing the EU’s AI Act with Australia’s Approach

Global companies need to navigate the differing AI regulations in the European Union and Australia, with the EU's AI Act setting stringent requirements based on risk levels, while Australia adopts a...

Quebec’s New AI Guidelines for Higher Education

Quebec has released its AI policy for universities and Cégeps, outlining guidelines for the responsible use of generative AI in higher education. The policy aims to address ethical considerations and...

AI Literacy: The Compliance Imperative for Businesses

As AI adoption accelerates, regulatory expectations are rising, particularly with the EU's AI Act, which mandates that all staff must be AI literate. This article emphasizes the importance of...

Germany’s Approach to Implementing the AI Act

Germany is moving forward with the implementation of the EU AI Act, designating the Federal Network Agency (BNetzA) as the central authority for monitoring compliance and promoting innovation. The...

Global Call for AI Safety Standards by 2026

World leaders and AI pioneers are calling on the United Nations to implement binding global safeguards for artificial intelligence by 2026. This initiative aims to address the growing concerns...

Governance in the Era of AI and Zero Trust

In 2025, AI has transitioned from mere buzz to practical application across various industries, highlighting the urgent need for a robust governance framework aligned with the zero trust economy...

AI Governance Shift: From Regulation to Technical Secretariat

The upcoming governance framework on artificial intelligence in India may introduce a "technical secretariat" to coordinate AI policies across government departments, moving away from the previous...

AI Safety as a Catalyst for Innovation in Global Majority Nations

The commentary discusses the tension between regulating AI for safety and promoting innovation, emphasizing that investments in AI safety and security can foster sustainable development in Global...

ASEAN’s AI Governance: Charting a Distinct Path

ASEAN's approach to AI governance is characterized by a consensus-driven, voluntary, and principles-based framework that allows member states to navigate their unique challenges and capacities...